August 4, 2007
It seems there has been not enough written about Barack Obama and its relations - if genuinely any - with the Black race. Most notably Aisha Hussain's suggestions in her recent write-up titled: Obama Wouldn't Be First Black President posing some legitimate question about the legitimacy of the "Illegitimate son of an African man.
Many, including Aisha Hussein wonder: "Are Americans Ready for a Black President?" "Is Obama Black Enough?" "Obama: America's First Black President?"
Obama has been consistent in proving how yet illegitimate son of an African man truly is. Very un-African, the Democratic presidential candidate said Wednesday August 2nd, 2007 that he would send troops to invade more Muslim nations, figuring out Pakistan to pursue what he feeble-mindedly called war on terror, an attempt to show strength when his chief rival has described his foreign policy skills as naive.
Naive or not, Barack's irresponsible threats against the Muslim world
only confirmed what millions of the
African Muslims, already
had known about him - illegitimate son of
their race. Obama's race - ever since the
Americans first met the Illinois
Senator in
2004 - has not only been called into question more times than Michael
Jackson's, it has also suggested the Americans
in their alarming ignorance of the
world are still capable of electing a racist
- though coloured - leader in Barack as inhumane and brutal
as George Bush.
Obama is clearly a black man in
appearance, but is this really a
breakthrough to make a bast*rd black
man an African? Well, some blacks say Obama isn't "black enough," which seems ironic because for many blacks, former President Bill Clinton was "black enough." In 2001, Clinton was honored as the nation's "first black president" at the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) Annual Awards Dinner in Washington, D.C.
"Were there other "black" presidents? Some historians have reason to believe people don't really understand the genealogy of past U.S. Presidents. Research shows at least five U.S. presidents had black ancestors and Thomas Jefferson, the nation's third president, was considered the first black president, according to historian Leroy Vaughn, author of Black People and Their Place in World History.",
wrote Aisha.
To be honest, the Muslims around the world care less who was or who has been and who is or who is to be the American president. They are all whom they are designed to be: anti-everything Islam preaches including peace and prosperity, justice and equity, God-loving and anti-slavery.
Agreed or disagreed? Perhaps someone needs to shout this loud. The American president - whoever he/she was, has been, is, or to be is an infid*l anyway - an imperialist, exploiter, oppressor, and racist. As a legitimate son of an African man, it's not offensive to suggest the African Americans have got it all in their dictionaries.
If it is true that there had been former black U.S. president in Jefferson, who served two terms between 1801 and 1809 described as the "son of a half-breed Indian squaw and a Virginia mulatto
father as well as in Andrew Jackson, the nation's seventh president, who was in office between 1829 and 1837 described as son of an Irish woman who married a black man whose oldest brother had been sold as a slave, it is true Obama is as remote to the Black race as these
previously Americans power-mongering politicians.
Rather Obama, just as illegitimate African as Lincoln, the nation's 16th president, served between 1861 and 1865 said to have been the illegitimate son of an African man, according to one Leroy's findings for having dark skin and coarse hair with his mother allegedly came from an Ethiopian tribe and with heritage that fueled so much controversy that Lincoln was nicknamed "Abraham Africanus the First" by his
opponents.
Hey, do you still call the African
Americans Yankees? President Warren Harding, the 29th president, in office between 1921 and 1923, apparently never denied his ancestry and evidently Harding had black ancestors between both sets of parents as he attended Iberia College, a school founded to educate fugitive slaves. And yet many African Americans knew very well he too was not only an illegitimate black figure, but also a black traitor of the black race - an Obama replicate.
Remember the sequence Mississippi
raids on the African Americans ordered
by Harding was in office...
However few unlike bast*rd Barack, Coolidge, the nation's 30th
president who served between 1923 and 1929 and supposedly was proud of his heritage, claiming his mother was dark because of mixed Indian ancestry whose mother's maiden name was "Moor" and in Europe the name "Moor" was given to all blacks just as "Negro" was used in America. It later was concluded that Coolidge was part black.
Therefore it's not unfair to expose that the only difference between Obama and these former presidents is that they did not contend for presidency to succeed as so stupid and outcast US president as George Bush who would certainly come less preferred in the poll if facing ex-German president Hitler with so many blood in his hands.
How unsurprising the warnings from the Illinois
image-Fricke senator that Pakistani
dictator General Musharraf must do more to oppress the Islamist in his country and evict foreign Islamic students under an Obama presidency, or
the Asian Muslim country will risk a US troop invasion and losing hundreds of millions of dollars in US military aid.
Even a greater evil individual George Bush on Friday came out in describing the prospect of Obama's strikes against Pakistan as
"unsavoury,".
Bush rushed to making his stance clear in this regards in a telephone call to another reckless leader Pervez Musharraf congratulating the Pakistani puppet ahead of the 60th anniversary of their independence on August
14 - he [Bush] is not as bad as not to
make a dictator general a lasting
partner.
"He [Bush] said that such statements were unsavoury and often prompted by political considerations in an environment of electioneering," Bush quoted to have said, without making direct reference to Obama.
"He [Bush] agreed that such statements did not serve the interests of either country."
In an interview with CNN in September 2006,
he [Bush] was asked if he would order US forces to go after Osama bin Laden inside Pakistan if he
[Bush] received good intelligence on the fugitive al-Qaeda leader's location. "Absolutely," he said.
"We would take the action necessary to bring him to justice,"
he [Bush] said.
His Homeland Security adviser, Fran Townsend, confirmed that position on July 17: "There's no question the president has made perfectly clear if we had actionable targets anywhere in the world, putting aside whether it was Pakistan or anyplace else, we would pursue those targets."
What then make the Americans different? Again - and perhaps with exception of those ever very African sensible and peace-loving African Americans or otherwise - the Americans are who they have ever been: anti-everything
humane and Godly - imperialists, exploiters, oppressors, and racists.
Infid*ls simply.
|
