|
22 April 2010 By Dave Lindorff The former Los Angeles police chief, Daryl Gates,
who died last Friday of cancer at his home in
California, is being widely credited in mostly
laudatory newspaper obituaries as the man who
developed the idea of Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT)units--those
paramilitary police teams so loved by Hollywood
filmmakers--who bring the art and weaponry of modern
warfare into communities, breaking into houses with
faces covered in ski masks, and carrying assault
weapons in order to make arrests for often minor
offenses, or blowing away people--often innocent
people--in what the modern military calls “force
escalation incidents.” But Gates was more than just the Sultan of SWAT.
He was also a proponent of the police-state tactic
of massive surveillance and spying. Not that he
invented it. As a deputy chief under Chief Ed Davis,
and later as chief of police, Gates inherited the
LAPD’s notorious “Red Squad,” known as the Public
Disorder Intelligence Division (PDID), which had a
sordid history going back into the 1920s, but he
certainly expanded it dramatically. I had my own experience with the PDID when I was an
editor of the little alternative news weekly, the
Los Angeles Vanguard, founded by myself and
several other Los Angeles journalists in 1976, after
the demise of the venerable Los Angeles Free Press.
Our publication, which took on the issue of police
brutality and especially the all-to-frequent shooting
of unarmed citizens, very quickly became a special
focus of the PDID. We learned, years after our
publication had folded, that our volunteer staff had
been infiltrated by a young PDID officer named Connie
Milazzo, a woman just out of the Police Academy, who
came to us posing as a journalist wannabe. In a depositions taken by attorneys with the
Southern California American Civil LIberties Union as
part of a class action suit against the LAPD and the
City of Los Angeles in the early 1980s, after Milazzo
and other equally young Red Squad spies had been
discovered infiltrating over 200 peaceful
organizations in Los Angeles ranging from our
newspaper to the local chapters of NOW, the Peace &
Freedom Party, and even the office of City Councillor
Zev Yaroslavsky, we learned that the PDID was
gathering dossiers on literally thousands of local
political activists, infiltrating and spying on
protected political activities like peace
demonstrations, anti-nuclear demonstrations and even
political campaigns, and also engaging in provocateur
activities, trying to encourage peaceful groups to
cross the line into criminal actions. We learned too that our paper was actually
sabotaged by the PDID, which operated under Gates’
authority. We had, after about six months’ operation,
hired a person at a considerable cost to sell
advertising space in the paper. We learned from this
person, only much later after the paper had to shut
down, that she had been told by her boss, an
advertizing agency executive, to only pretend to try
and sell ads. It turns out that the executive had a
son who had been busted by the LAPD for drugs, and the
police had extorted the father, saying if he prevented
our paper from getting advertising, they’d get the
charges dropped against his son. Gates is hailed too, for being the first police
chief to add helicopters to the police department’s
arsenal. It was a logical move. The LAPD already was
widely seen as essentially a military organization, so
why not have an air force too? But in fact, the
helicopters were mostly a huge waste of department
money. They gave the department, and its chief, great
bragging rights at tony Los Angeles parties and police
conventions, but did little to reduce crime. I remember how back then, when I lived on a hill
across Alvarado Boulevard from Dodger Stadium in the
Echo Park section of L.A., how when I would come home
from Vanguard Office, often a police helicopter would
be secretly following my car. When I’d park and start
walking up the steps towards my house, I’d suddenly be
bathed in a light as bright as day, as the helicopter
would turn on its searchlight. It was a clear attempt
at intimidation and harassment, as were the
helicopters that, during the day, often came to buzz
by and hover over our office in the Crenshaw District,
just to let us know they were watching. (This was done
also to my wife Joyce, who says she sometimes
appreciated the light when she'd be trying to
negotiate dark steps and a narrow sidewalk, while
carrying a bag of groceries and an armload of books
and music from her graduate work at USC.) Connie tried to get our inside sources for police
stories. Her technique was simple. She would volunteer
to stay in the office and answer the phone while the
three or four editors went out to lunch. I kept all my
files in those pre-computer days in a metal recipe box
on index cards. Fortunately I kept my best sources
hidden by using false names and carefully rearranged
phone numbers, so my inside sources in the LAPD and
the Sheriff’s Department were never uncovered by
Millazzo. But it wasn’t for lack of her trying, I’m
sure. The lawsuit brought against Gates and the PDID,
settled out of court because the PDID didn’t want to
have to disclose any more of its nefarious activities,
which it turns out included selling much of the
collected data on local activists to a right-wing
organization called Western Goals that had links to
the John Birch Society, ultimately cost the City of
Los Angeles $1.8 million, of which I received $2000. So I guess I owe Chief Gates a small word of
thanks. The money came at a point when my wife and I,
by then living and working as freelancers in New York
(and expecting a baby), were low on cash. But that
check hardly compensates for his role in helping to
undermine and destroy an award-winning but financially
fragile investigative newspaper that was for the first
time exposing the LAPD’s role in killing unarmed
citizens through excessive use of force and an
official, but secret, department policy of
shoot-to-kill. Gates’ obsession with violence and his policy of
using the police in Los Angeles as an occupying army
in poor minority communities ultimately led to his
undoing. His defense of the officers filmed beating
the unarmed and defenseless Rodney King, and his inept
handling of the days of wide-spread rioting that
followed the aquittal of those officers by an
all-white jury, led to his being forced to resign as
chief in 1992. Chief Gates represented all that is wrong with
police and law-enforcement in America. Thanks to him,
my little town of Upper Dublin, a mostly
upper-middle-class exuburb just north of Philadelphia
where crime mostly consists of breaking and entering,
or an occasional case of drunkenness or disorderly
conduct, boasts a big gray SWAT panel truck, equipped
with assault weapons and god knows what else that
never gets used, but that gets shown off every year at
an annual police and fire department show-and-tell
day. And surely, his PDID, and the spying it engaged
in, was a harbinger of and even pioneer for the almost
universal surveillance state that we now live in, with
cameras popping up everywhere, our electronic
communications constantly monitored, and police acting
like the gestapo, instead of the civil servants they
are supposed to be. Indeed, Gates profited handily off the trend
towards increased surveillance that he helped
encourage, moving from his disgraced resignation from
the LAPD to a lucrative post as chief executive of
Global ePoint, a maker of digital video surveillance
systems. I for one will not miss him. |