|
Writers Articles And Opinions |
|
|
|
16 July 2010 By Stephen Lendman
Across America, daily incidents
occur, one of many the cold-blooded January 1, 2009
murder of Oscar Grant - unarmed, offering no
resistance, thrust face-down on the ground, shot in
the back, and killed, videotaped on at least four
cameras for irrefutable proof. USA Today said five
bystanders taped it.
His killer: Oakland, CA transit
officer, Johannes Mehserle, tried for the killing, the
jury told to consider four possible verdicts -
innocent, second-degree murder, voluntary
manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter, jurors
deciding the latter.
The Legal Dictionary defines it
as "The act of unlawfully killing another human being
unintentionally," the absence of intent distinguishing
it from voluntary manslaughter. Many states don't
define it or do it vaguely. Wallin & Klarich Violent
Crime Attorneys say in California it carries a two -
four year sentence. However, since a gun was used,
Judge Robert Perry can add three to 10 additional
years.
Because minority victims seldom
get justice, especially against police, Mehserle may
serve minimal time, then be paroled quietly when the
current furor subsides.
After the verdict, it erupted on
Oakland streets, hundreds turning out to protest, Bay
Area indymedia.org saying:
"The actions of the Police in
Oakland tonight (including dozens of arrests) show
their disrespect for justice in General. Their heavy
handed violence towards protestors just reinforces
their total disconnect with the people of Oakland."
It's as true everywhere across America, police acting
like Gestapo, usually unaccountably.
Grant's family will appeal the
verdict and is suing the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
for $25 million, his mother Wanda Johnson saying "My
son was murdered (and) the law has not held the
officer accountable." It rarely does for Black,
Latino, or other minorities, no matter the injustice,
civil rights lawyer John Burris, representing Grant's
family in the civil suit, saying:
"The system is rarely fair when a
police officer shoots an African-American male."
Police brutality against them and other minorites is
systemic, including beatings, torture, and
cold-blooded murder, usually with impunity, justice
nearly always denied.
While far from certain, the Obama
administration may charge Mehserle with civil rights
or hate crime violations, DOJ spokesman Alejandro
Miyar saying:
"The Justice Department has been
closely monitoring the state's investigation and
prosecution. The Civil Rights Division, the US
Attorney's Office, and the FBI have an open
investigation into the fatal shooting and, at the
conclusion of the state prosecution, will conduct an
independent review of the facts and circumstances to
determine whether the evidence warrants federal
prosecution."
Systemic Police
Brutality
An earlier Jones Report.com text
and video account headlined, "Epidemic of Police
Brutality Sweeps America," showing footage of police
repeatedly tasering a student with 50,000 volts of
electricity for questioning the 2004 election results
at a campus meeting.
Other videotaped incidents
showed:
-- a man victimized by police
violence;
-- a former sheriff's deputy
acquitted of voluntary manslaughter for shooting an
unarmed man;
-- police repeatedly beating an
old man on the head, "for the crime of intoxication;"
-- officers violently using
assault rifles, tear gas, dogs, and at least one
helicopter in an alleged narcotics sweep;
-- a woman tasered to death by
police; and
-- a man in shock, bleeding and
burned over much of his body, ordered to lie on the
pavement, then tasered and shot to death while he sat
dazed, the Report highlighting systemic police
violence "repeated almost every day in (America), the
police (getting) away with murder," beatings, and
other lawless acts - poor Blacks, Latinos, and Muslims
for their faith and ethnicity their usual victims.
Amnesty
International (AI) on American Police Brutality
On its web site, AI says "Police
brutality and use of excessive force has been one of
the central themes of (AI's) campaign on human rights
violations in the USA," launched in October 1998. In
its "United States of America: Rights for All Index,"
it documented systematic patterns of abuse across
America, including "police beatings, unjustified
shootings and the use of dangerous restraint
techniques to subdue suspects."
Yet little is done to monitor or
constrain it, evidence showing that "racial and ethnic
minorities were disproportionately" harmed by
harassment, verbal and physical abuse, false arrests,
and in the case of West African immigrant, Amadou
Diallo, shot at 41 times by four New York policemen,
struck 19 times and killed while he stood in the
vestibule of his apartment building, unarmed and
nonviolent, victimized by police brutality.
Nationwide, driving while black
has been criminalized, racial profiling used for
traffic stops and searches for suspected drugs or
other reasons, the practice especially common in
California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Rhode
Island, and Texas.
AI cited numerous incidents,
including beatings and "questionable" shootings,
usually found to be unjustified, yet cops most often
absolved. Although most US police departments
stipulate that officers should only use deadly force
when their lives, or others, are endangered, dozens of
cases show they do it indiscriminately, at most being
"mildly disciplined" even if guilty of serious
misconduct.
"Police shooting(s) resulting in
death or injury are routinely reviewed (internally or)
by local prosecutors....to see whether criminal laws
(were) violated. However, few officers are criminally
charged and little public information is given out if
a case does not go to trial." As a result, systemic
abuse stays hidden, police brutality allowed to
persist with impunity.
Despite Congress passing the 1994
Police Accountability Act, incorporated into the 1994
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act to
require the Attorney General to compile national data
on excessive police force, Congress has consistently
failed to fund it. Further, the legislation doesn't
require local police agencies to keep records or
submit data to the Justice Department. Nor does it
criminalize police violence and excessive force as
human rights violations.
ACLU Report on
Racial and Ethnic Profiling
In August 2009, the report
titled, "The Persistence of Racial Profiling in the
United States" quoted Rep. John Conyers (D. MI) saying
"Since (9/11), our nation has engaged in a policy of
institutionalized racial and ethnic profiling,"
although, as an African-American, he knows the problem
goes back generations, most recently in the "war on
terrorism" against Blacks, Latinos, and Muslims for
their faith, ethnicity, activism, prominence, and at
times charity, a topic this writer addresses often -
arrests, some violently, bogus charges, prosecutions,
and imprisonments often compounding the injustice.
Post-9/11 under Bush and Obama,
federal, state and local law enforcement agencies have
engaged in virulent racial/ethnic profiling, what the
ACLU calls "a widespread and pervasive problem
throughout the United States, impacting the lives of
millions of people in African American, Asian, Latino,
South Asian, and Arab communities."
Evidence shows that racial
minorities are systematically victimized, without
cause, in public, when driving, at work, at home, in
places of worship, and traveling, often violently.
A "major impediment to
(prohibiting it) remains the continued unwillingness
or inability of the US government to pass federal
legislation (banning the practice) with binding effect
on federal, state or local law enforcement."
Nor do authorities comply with
the provisions of the 1994 Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)
that obligates all levels of government.
In addition, the Justice
Department's 2003 Guidance Regarding the Use of Race
by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies designed to ban
federal officers from engaging in racial profiling is,
in fact, flawed and does little to end it, because it
doesn't cover "profiling based on religion, religious
appearance, or national origin."
Nor does it apply to state and
local law enforcement where police brutality is
systemic. In addition, it specifies no enforcement
mechanisms or punishments for violators, and contains
a "blanket exception for national security and border
integrity cases," besides being advisory and not
legally binding.
As a result, it actually promotes
profiling and abuse, including false arrests, beatings
and killings. It's not surprising how minorities have
been systematically mistreated by federal, state and
local authorities, or that congressional legislation
introduced to stop it never passed.
On December 13, 2007, the House
and Senate introduced their versions of the End Racial
Profiling Act (HR 4611 and S. 2481). Both bills were
referred to committee and never enacted - making it
extremely hard to nearly impossible for victims to
successfully challenge abuses against them.
As a candidate, Obama promised a
"Blueprint for Change" to ban racial profiling and
related mistreatment, criminalizing them, but so far,
no measures have been introduced or passed, showing
another promise made, another broken, a systematic
pattern under his leadership, across the board against
the constituencies that elected him. Hopefully they'll
remember next election and choose another way, a third
way, both parties equally corrupted in deference to
big money and systemic police brutality that serves
it.
National Police
Misconduct Statistics
The Injustice Everywhere.com (IE)
web site compiles them, publishing them in regular
reports, some for individual cities, including daily
accounts. One on July 10 covers King County, WA deputy
Paul Schene, captured on videotape assaulting a
15-year old girl in jail. He was tried twice, hung
juries resulting each time.
On July 9, the County
Prosecutor's Office dropped the charges, and won't
pursue a third trial. As a result, the sheriff's
department may rehire Schene, though he still faces
possible disciplinary action. It's currently in
arbitration, IE saying decisions nearly always favor
officers, in which case he'll likely be reinstated to
abuse other detainees, off camera to avoid being
charged.
In early 2010, IE published an
April - mid-December 2009 (8.5 months) Police
Misconduct Report, from figures compiled in its
National Police Misconduct Statistics Reporting
Project (NPMSRP), begun earlier in March 2009,
analyzing data:
"by utilizing news media reports
of police misconduct to generate statistical
information (to) approximate how prevalent (it) may be
in the United States."
Police departments don't usually
provide them, nor do courts, except for successful
prosecutions, omitting confidential settlements and
cases resulting in disciplinary action only, not
trials. Media reports, though imperfect, are more
complete because laws limit or filter information
released. As a result, IE's data "should be considered
as a low-end estimate of the current rate of police
misconduct," as well as in individual cities covered.
Statistics compiled follow the
same DOJ/FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR)
methodology, recording only the most serious
allegation (not conviction) when multiple ones are
associated with a particular incident. The findings
were as follows:
-- 3,445 police misconduct
reports;
-- 4,012 officers charged;
-- 261 law enforcement officials
(police chiefs or sheriffs) cited;
-- 4,778 alleged victims;
-- 258 fatalities reported;
-- an average of 15.05 daily
incidents or one every 96 minutes;
-- nearly $200 million in related
civil litigation expense, excluding legal fees and
court costs;
-- 980.64 per 100,000 officers
charged;
-- one of every 266 officers
accused of a violent crime;
-- one of every 1,875 charged
with homocide;
-- one of every 947 accused of
sexual assault;
-- 33% of police officers charged
were convicted, not necessarily justly for the offense
committed;
-- 64% of officers convicted were
imprisoned, not necessarily as long as justified;
-- those sentenced served an
average 14 months, far less than citizens for the same
crime;
-- misconduct by category
included 18.1% for non-firearm related excessive
force; 11.9% for sexual misconduct; and 8.9% for fraud
or theft;
-- analyzing reports by last
reported status showed 45.9% affected officers
adversely, including 14% internally disciplined and
31.9% criminally charged; of the latter, 32.5% were
convicted "for a 10.4% total criminal conviction rate
for alleged misconduct incidents; and
-- 27% resulted in civil
lawsuits, 34.3% favoring victims.
In addition, data were compiled
for states, cities and counties, excluding unavailable
federal statistics as well as local omissions,
especially in some states. Various offenses included:
-- accountability: evidence of
coverups, lax discipline, and other failures to adhere
to official policies or processes;
-- animal cruelty, harming them
by unnecessary shooting, inappropriate KP unit
training, or other mistreatment;
-- assault: "unwarranted
violence" off-duty, excluding murder;
-- auto incidents involving
recklessness, negligence, and other violations of
official policies;
-- brutality, involving excessive
physical force on-duty, excluding firearms or tasers;
-- civil rights, including
unconstitutional civil liberties violations such as
lawless peaceful protest disruptions;
-- sexual misconduct, including
rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, wrongfully
eliciting sex, harassment, coercion, prostitution, sex
on duty, incest, and molestation;
-- theft or fraud, including
robbery, shoplifting, extortion or bribery;
-- shooting: gun-related
incidents both on and off-duty, including self-harm;
-- taser: excessive force,
including usage not according to guidelines, resulting
in excessive injury or death; also, improper taser use
may be recorded as "brutality;"
-- color of law, including
incidents involving misuse of authority such as
bribery, soliciting favors, extortion by threat of
arrest, or using badges to avoid arrest;
-- perjury, including false
testimony, dishonesty during investigations, and
falsifying charging papers or warrants; and
-- raids, including misconduct
during warranted or warrantless operations or
searches, wrong address raids, mistaken ones, use of
no-knock ones when warrants require notification, or
mistreatment during executions.
Misconduct status stages go from
allegations to investigations, lawsuits, charges,
trials, judgments, disciplinary measures,
terminations, convictions, and sentences.
IE compiles data regularly,
prepares daily and quarterly reports, and henceforth
an annual one each January the following year. It
explains that its statistics:
"should only be used (as) a very
basic and general view of the extent of police
misconduct. It is by no means an accurate gauge that
truly represents the exact extent (of its
extensiveness) since it relies on the information
voluntarily gathered and/or released to the media, not
(first-hand) by independent monitors who investigate
complaints.....because no such agency exists for any
law enforcement agency...."
Detailed quarterly and annual
reports are produced, not monthly ones considered a
less accurate "depiction of the overall extent of
police misconduct...." Daily reports cover a sampling
of individual incidents. Overall, IE provides a
valuable reading of systemic police misconduct, though
capturing only a snapshot of the full problem -
widespread, abusive, violent, often with impunity, and
when officers are held accountable, imposed discipline
is usually mild, prison sentences rare and short-term,
victims cheated by a criminally unjust system,
favoring power over people, no matter the offense.
Final Comments
In December 2007, the UN
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
published a report titled, "In the Shadows of the War
on Terror: Persistent Police Brutality and Abuse of
People of Color in the United States," saying:
"Since this Committee's 2001
review of the US, during which it expressed concern
regarding incidents of police brutality and deaths in
custody at the hands of US law enforcement officers,
there have been dramatic increases in law enforcement
powers in the name of waging the "war on terror
(resulting in) the use of excessive force against
people of color....(It's not only continued
post-9/11), but has worsened in both practice and
severity" - a NAACP representative saying it's "the
worst I've seen in 50 years."
On April 4, 2007, Ryan Gallagher,
writing for Medill Reports, produced by Northwestern
University's Medill School of Journalism, headlined,
"Study: Police abuse goes unpunished," saying:
From 2002 - 2004, over "10,000
complaints of police abuse were filed with Chicago
police....but only 19 resulted in meaningful
disciplinary action, a new study asserts." According
to Gerald Frazier, president of Citizens Alert, it
reflects "not only the appearance of influence and
cover-up," but clear evidence that city residents are
being abused, not protected, despite the department's
official motto being "We Serve and Protect."
Most disturbing is that the
Chicago pattern reflects what's happening across
America, people of color like Oscar Grant
systematically abused, in his case murdered in cold
blood, what no criminal or civil actions can undo.
Stephen Lendman lives in
Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and
listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished
guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the
Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central
time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs
are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
EsinIslam.Com
|