Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence? The "Unsong Hero" Won't Sing
06 December 2010By Christopher Bollyn
During the past two months I have been involved in
research about the Rothschild/Mossad network behind
the criminal destruction of the steel from the World
Trade Center. I have found that the network that
arranged for the destruction of the steel - critical
evidence from the crime scene - was actually organized
by Israel's Mossad and their Zionist agents, the real
culprits behind the false-flag terrorism that changed
the world. This article will be the final and
conclusive chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The
Deception that Changed the World.
On 19 November 2010 I sent photographs of two of the
main people involved in the "recycling" of the 300,000
tons of steel from the World Trade Center to Roy Tov,
the Christian Israeli author of The Cross of
Bethlehem. I sent these photos of the culprits behind
the criminal destruction of the steel to Tov because
he is very knowledgable about the Mossad, having been
pursued and targeted by Israeli assassins around the
world. This is what Roy Tov wrote back to me on
November 21:
Thanks Christopher,
If the pictures are real, then there is little doubt
regarding their allies and employers. The chances
they'll answer in such case are slim, or it will be in
the form of an attack (lawyers or violent) against
you.
In September, when I began my research into the people
behind the destrucion of the steel, I called the Hugo
Neu company, which was one of the two New Jersey
scrapyards that "recycled" the steel. Hugo Neu was a
German Jewish immigrant from Fürth (like Henry
Kissinger, another Rothschild agent) who came to
America and worked as a bank clerk with Seligman & Co.
before becoming the head of Associated Metals and
Minerals Corporation (AMMC) in New York in the 1930s
with his German Jewish fellows, Meno Lissauer and
Walter M. Rothschild, the company's president.
Lissauer's wife, Meta, was also Walter Rothschild's
sister. Hugo Neu started his own scrap metal company
in 1945. The company is now run by his son, John, and
has very close business ties to the state of Israel
and is invested in a Mossad-linked Israeli venture
fund.
Since 2001, the two companies involved in the
destruction of the steel, Sims Metal Management and
Hugo Neu, have merged into one company. I called and
asked to speak with Alan Ratner, the former head of
Metal Management in New Jersey, Daniel Dienst, or
Robert Kelman, since these were the key executives
involved in the 9/11 steel recycling. I got through to
Ratner's secretary, who gave me his email, but instead
of letting me speak to any of these men, I was
connected to company's spokesman, Daniel Strechay.
Daniel Strechay is the corporate gatekeeper who speaks
for the company who profited from the illegal
destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade
Center.
Strechay was completely unwilling to answer any
questions. I told him that the destruction of the
steel is a matter of great historic importance and
that in the interest of fairness and accuracy I wanted
to speak directly with the people involved. Strechay
refused, saying "It's all a matter of public record.
Read the Wall Street Journal."
He then said that the company is very proud of how it
handled the steel from the Twin Towers, but was
adamant in his refusal to let me speak with any of the
men who were actually involved in the operation, and
hung up the phone. Later, I got through to Alan Ratner
by email and he wrote back, so I sent him a few
questions, but he yet to respond. Clearly, these men
do not want to discuss their roles in the destruction
of the steel from the World Trade Center.
I called Kenneth Holden at his home in Scarsdale, New
York, on October 16, to ask him some questions about
his role in the clean-up of the debris at the World
Trade Center. Holden is the former head of New York
City's Department of Design and Construction (DDC),
and was the official who oversaw the removal of the
steel. As Mayor Bloomberg said about Commissioner
Holden, when he was reappointed as head of the DDC in
January 2002:
New Yorkers are fortunate to have Commissioner Holden
agree to remain as Commissioner of DDC," said Mayor
Bloomberg. "Over the last four months he has done a
terrific job managing the clean up of the World Trade
Center and so that the reconstruction process for
Lower Manhattan can begin. By coordinating the
movement of millions of tons of steel and rubble,
excavating one of the most dangerous work sites in the
world all seemingly ahead of schedule, under budget
and without a fatality, Kenneth Holden has been the
unsung hero of this enormous task.
Kenneth Holden
THE "UNSUNG HERO" WON'T SING
When Holden gave his statement to the 9/11 Commission
on April 1, 2003, he said that he had received "verbal
permission" to remove the steel to New Jersey
scrapyards, but failed to name the person who had
authorized the move. Oddly, nobody bothered to ask who
gave Holden the verbal permission:
Steel and debris from the site was sent to Fresh Kills
where it was examined and sifted. As the Department of
Sanitation could no longer handle the steel with their
equipment, and our engineers thought the steel would
destabilize the landfill, DDC received verbal
permission to ship the steel to New Jersey. (From
whom?) By the end of June 2002, an astounding total of
over 1.6 million tons of steel and other debris were
removed from the site.
It was Saturday morning when I reached Holden at his
home. I told him I was working on an article about the
destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center
and wanted to ask him a few questions. He bawked a bit
at first, saying that he was no longer giving
interviews on the subject, so I repeated what he told
the commission and asked the most important question
first: Who gave you the verbal permission to ship the
steel to New Jersey scrapyards? I was able to repeat
the question twice very clearly. After a short pause
Holden said, "As I said, I'm not giving interviews on
this subject." Then he silently ended the call.
I thought for a minute and called Holden right back.
He picked up the phone and I immediately asked, "Was
it Chertoff? Was it Michael Chertoff who gave you the
verbal permission?" Holden was silent on the other end
of the line, then he ended the call as he had done
before.
"Silence is agreement" is the old Estonian saying that
came to mind. The logic is that Holden could not deny
that Chertoff had given him the verbal permission, so
he remained silent. Common sense would suggest that
the permission must have come from Chertoff, who as
Assistant Attorney General of the United States was
the top dog responsible for the federal (FBI)
investigation of 9/11.
Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff was "top
dog" at the FBI during the "non-investigation" of
9/11, in which the crucial steel evidence was
destroyed in Asian smelters before being examined by
engineers. Chertoff's Israeli mother, Livia Eisen, was
one of the first Mossad agents. An Israeli by birth,
Michael spent much of his childhood in Israel.
To understand the essence of the crime, I recommend
reading the short article "Selling Out the
Investigation" by Bill Manning of Fire Engineering.
Manning's piece was published on January 1, 2002. The
destruction of the steel was a crucial part of the
9/11 hoax. A hoax cannot succeed if there is evidence
that reveals the truth and 9/11 is a global hoax.
The Twin Towers were primarily steel structures
supporting 220 lightweight concrete floors.
The towers were well built structures that used more
steel than today's skyscrapers. The debris contained
about 300,000 tons of steel that was hastily
dispatched by a New York City official to two
Zionist-controlled scrapyards in New Jersey - before
it could even be inspected by engineers. These
Jewish-owned scrapyards then shipped the steel - hard
evidence from the crime scene - to Asian smelters
where it was melted down far from the prying eyes of
U.S. investigators. Why was this allowed and who was
behind it?
An organization called the NYC Coalition for
Accountability Now (NYC CAN) is calling for the public
to demand that the district attorney of New York
County investigate and prosecute those responsible for
the destruction of the evidence from the crime scene.
This is from their open letter/petition of June 23,
2010 to the district attorney's office:
Cy Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York County
Thomas Wornom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions
Bureau
Dear Sirs:
Over the last three weeks you have been informed about
the overwhelming evidence that World Trade Center
Building 7 was demolished with explosives. I trust
that you understand the serious implications of this
crime and that you are resolved to prosecute the
guilty parties. To provide a critical steppingstone in
your investigation, I would like to bring to your
attention the widely documented – and widely protested
– destruction of physical evidence (structural steel)
at the crime scene, which I contend is prosecutable
pursuant to Article 205 of the New York Penal Code, §
205.50 Hindering Prosecution.
"[A] person `renders criminal assistance' when, with
intent to prevent, hinder or delay the discovery or
apprehension of…a person he knows or believes has
committed a crime…he...suppresses, by any act of
concealment, alteration or destruction, any physical
evidence which might aid in the discovery or
apprehension of such person or in the lodging of a
criminal charge against him;"
I will present publicly available information on the
destruction of physical evidence from the World Trade
Center site, below my signature, in four sections
entitled:
1. Official acknowledgement of the destruction of
physical evidence from the WTC.
2. Control of the WTC cleanup.
3. The decision to destroy the physical evidence.
4. The continued destruction of evidence despite
public outcry
The supporting documentation provided in this
letter/petition from NYC CAN includes the following:
"In the month that lapsed between the terrorist
attacks and the deployment of the [FEMA Building
Performance Assessment Team (BPAT Team)], a
significant amount of steel debris—including most of
the steel from the upper floors—was removed from the
rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either
melted at the recycling plant or shipped out of the
U.S. Some of the critical pieces of steel—including
the suspension trusses from the top of the towers and
the internal support columns—were gone before the
first BPAT team member ever reached the site.
Fortunately, an NSF-funded independent researcher,
recognizing that valuable evidence was being
destroyed, attempted to intervene with the City of New
York to save the valuable artifacts, but the city was
unwilling to suspend the recycling contract."
- Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives,
March 6, 2002
"[T]here is so much that has been lost in these last
six months that we can never go back and retrieve. And
that is not only unfortunate, it is borderline
criminal."
- Joseph Crowley, U.S. Congressman, 7th District, New
York
"[O]n September 28, the New York Times learned that
the city was recycling the steel. When the Times
contacted Kenneth R. Holden, commissioner of the
Department of Design and Construction, he said that no
one from the investigative team had asked him to keep
or inspect the steel. The ASCE, it turned out, had
faxed a request, but to the wrong fax machine. Late
that afternoon, after reporters shuttled the correct
fax number to the ASCE, Holden said that a request had
finally reached him."
Commissioner Kenneth R. Holden and his wife Frances
McGuire. Holden was given an award in 2002 by the AIA
New York Chapter after he had overseen the criminal
destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.
Why was he being awarded when he should have been
arrested?
By September 28, the DDC is publicly known to have
been aware of the BPAT's request for the steel to be
saved, however, the decision to recycle the steel
stood.
Of course, Mayor Giuliani – previously a U.S. Attorney
– and the DDC had to be fully aware of the illegality
of destroying the physical evidence prior to their
decision to recycle the steel. Their refusal to desist
from recycling the steel when asked by the
investigative team to do so – still less than three
weeks into the cleanup effort, with hundreds of
thousands of tons of steel still salvageable, and
relatively negligible revenue from selling the steel
not an issue because there was virtually unlimited
federal funding for the cleanup effort – strongly
suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate
and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a
crime they knew had taken place...
Calls to halt the recycling fell on deaf ears.
According to Times reporters Glanz and Lipton:
"Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to
written and oral requests for comment over a three-day
period about who decided to recycle the steel and the
concern that the decision might be handicapping the
investigation. `The city considered it reasonable to
have recovered structural steel recycled,' said
Matthew G. Monahan, a spokesman for the city's
Department of Design and Construction, which is in
charge of debris removal at the site"
Why didn't the city simply stop recycling the steel?
Again, the outright refusal of city officials to
desist from recycling the steel strongly suggests
their contravention of the law was deliberate and
motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a
crime they knew had taken place.
I strongly support the NYC CAN petition to prosecute
those behind the criminal destruction of the steel
from the World Trade Center. My forthcoming article
will reveal the key people involved in the terror
network behind this crime.
In the meantime, I recommend visiting the website of
NYC CAN to understand the basis of their appeal for
justice and the extent of the criminal destruction of
evidence from the World Trade Center: http://www.nyccan.org/join.php
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments