|
“Happy As A Hangman”: The American Corporate Systems - Pollute, Impoverish, Maim And Kill
10 January 2011 By Chris Hedges
“Innocence, as defined by law, makes us complicit
with the crimes of the state. To do nothing, to be
judged by the state as an innocent, is to be guilty.
It is to sanction, through passivity and obedience,
the array of crimes carried out by the state.
To be innocent in America means we passively permit
offshore penal colonies where we torture human
beings, some of whom are children. To be innocent in
America is to acquiesce to the relentless corporate
destruction of the ecosystem that sustains the human
species. To be innocent in America is to permit the
continued theft of hundreds of billions of dollars
from the state by Wall Street swindlers and
speculators. To be innocent in America is to stand
by as insurance and pharmaceutical companies, in the
name of profit, condemn ill people, including
children, to die. To be innocent in America is
refusing to resist wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that
are not only illegal under international law but
responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands
of people. This is the odd age we live in. Innocence
is complicity.
The steady impoverishment and misery inflicted by
the corporate state on the working class and
increasingly the middle class has a terrible logic.
It consolidates corporate centers of power. It
weakens us morally and politically. The fraud and
violence committed by the corporate state become
secondary as we scramble to feed our families, find
a job and pay our bills and mortgages. Those who
cling to insecure, poorly paid jobs and who struggle
with crippling credit card debt, those who are mired
in long-term unemployment and who know that huge
medical bills would bankrupt them, those who owe
more on their houses than they are worth and who
fear the future, become frightened and timid. They
seek only to survive. They accept the pathetic
scraps tossed to them by the corporate elite. The
internal and external corporate abuse accelerates as
we become every day more pliant.
Our corrupt legal system, perverting the concept
that “all men are created equal,” has radically
redefined civic society. Citizens, regardless of
their status or misfortune, are now treated with the
same studied indifference by the state. They have
been transformed from citizens to commodities whose
worth is determined solely by the market and whose
value is measured by their social and economic
functions. The rich, therefore, are rewarded by the
state with tax cuts because they are rich. It is
their function to monopolize wealth and invest. The
poor are supposed to be poor. The poor should not be
a drain on the resources of the state or the
oligarchic elite. Equality, in this new legal
paradigm, means we are all treated alike, no matter
what our circumstances. This new interpretation of
equality, under which the poor are abandoned and the
powerful are unchecked, has demolished the system of
regulations, legal restraints and services that once
protected the underclass from wealthy and corporate
predators.
The creation of a permanent, insecure and frightened
underclass is the most effective weapon to thwart
rebellion and resistance as our economy worsens.
Huge pools of unemployed and underemployed blunt
labor organizing, since any job, no matter how
menial, is zealously coveted. As state and federal
social welfare programs, especially in education,
are gutted, we create a wider and wider gulf between
the resources available to the tiny elite and the
deprivation and suffering visited on our permanent
underclass. Access to education, for example, is now
largely defined by class. The middle class, taking
on huge debt, desperately flees to private
institutions to make sure their children have a
chance to enter the managerial ranks of the
corporate elite. And this is the idea. Public
education, which, when it functions, gives
opportunities to all citizens, hinders a system of
corporate neofeudalism. Corporations are advancing,
with Barack Obama’s assistance, charter schools and
educational services that are stripped down and
designed to train classes for their appropriate
vocations, which, if you’re poor means a future in
the service sector. The eradication of teachers’
unions, under way in states such as New Jersey, is a
vital component in the dismantling of public
education. Corporations know that good systems of
public education are a hindrance to a rigid caste
system. In corporate America everyone will be kept
in his or her place.
The beating down of workers, exacerbated by the
prospect that unemployment benefits will not be
renewed for millions of Americans and that public
sector unions will soon be broken, has transformed
those in the working class from full members of
society, able to participate in its debates, the
economy and governance, into terrified people in
fragmented pools preoccupied with the struggle of
private existence. Those who are economically broken
usually cease to be concerned with civic virtues.
They will, history has demonstrated, serve any
system, no matter how evil, and do anything for a
salary, job security and the protection of their
families.
There will be sectors of the society that, as the
situation worsens, attempt to rebel. But the state
can rely on a huge number of people who, for work
and meager benefits, will transform themselves into
willing executioners. The reconfiguration of
American society into a corporate oligarchy is
conditioning tens of millions not only to passively
accept state and corporate crimes, but to actively
participate in the mechanisms that ensure their own
enslavement. “Each time society, through
unemployment, frustrates the small man in his normal
functioning and normal self-respect,” Hannah Arendt
wrote in her 1945 essay “Organized Guilt and
Universal Responsibility,” “it trains him for that
last stage in which he will willingly undertake any
function, even that of hangman.”
Organs of state repression do not rely so much on
fanatics and sadists as ordinary citizens who are
desperate, who need a job, who are willing to obey.
Arendt relates a story of a Jew who is released from
Buchenwald. The freed Jew encountered, among the SS
men who gave him certificates of release, a former
schoolmate, whom he did not address but stared at.
The SS guard spontaneously explained to his former
friend: “You must understand, I have five years of
unemployment behind me. They can do anything they
want with me.” Arendt also quotes an interview with
a camp official at Majdanek. The camp official
concedes that he has assisted in the gassing and
burying of people alive. But when he is asked, “Do
you know the Russians will hang you?” he bursts into
tears. “Why should they? What have I done?” he says.
I can imagine, should the rule of law ever one day
be applied to the insurance companies responsible
for the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans
denied medical care, that there will be the same
confused response from insurance executives. What is
frightening in collapsing societies is not only the
killers, sadists, murderers and psychopaths who rise
up out of the moral swamp to take power, but the
huge numbers of ordinary people who become complicit
in state crimes. I saw this during the war in El
Salvador and the war in Bosnia. It is easy to
understand a demented enemy. It is puzzling to
understand a rational and normal one. True evil, as
Goethe understood, is not always palpable. It is “to
render invisible another human consciousness.”
Alexander Solzhenitsyn in his book “The Gulag
Archipelago” writes about a close friend who served
with him in World War II. Solzhenitsyn’s defiance of
the Communist regime after the war saw him sent to
the Soviet gulags. His friend, loyal to the state,
was sent there as an interrogator. Solzhenitsyn was
forced to articulate a painful truth. The mass of
those who serve systems of terrible oppression and
state crime are not evil. They are weak. “If only
there were vile people ... committing evil deeds,
and if it were only necessary to separate them from
the rest of us and destroy them,” Solzhenitsyn
wrote. “But the line dividing good and evil cuts
through the heart of every human being. And who is
willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
The expansions of public and private organs of state
security, from Homeland Security to the mercenary
forces we are building in Iraq and Afghanistan, to
the burgeoning internal intelligence organizations,
exist because these “ordinary” citizens, many of
whom are caring fathers and mothers, husbands and
wives, sons and daughters, have confused conformity
to the state with innocence. Family values are used,
especially by the Christian right, as the exclusive
definition of public morality. Politicians,
including President Obama, who betray the working
class, wage doomed imperial wars, abandon families
to home foreclosures and bank repossessions, and
refuse to restore habeas corpus, are morally “good”
because they are loyal husbands and fathers.
Infidelity, instead of corporate murder, becomes in
this absurd moral reasoning the highest and most
unforgivable offense.
The bureaucrats who maintain these repressive state
organs, who prosecute the illegal wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan or who maintain corporate structures
that perpetuate human suffering, can define
themselves as good—as innocent—as long as they are
seen as traditional family men and women who are
compliant to the laws of the state. And this
redefinition of civic engagement permits us to
suspend moral judgment and finally common sense. Do
your job. Do not ask questions. Do not think. If
these bureaucrats were challenged for the crimes
they are complicit in committing, including the
steady dismantling of the democratic state, they
would react with the same disbelief as the camp
guard at Majdanek.
Those who serve as functionaries within corporations
such as Goldman Sachs or ExxonMobil and carry out
crimes ask of their masters that they be exempted
from personal responsibility for the acts they
commit. They serve corporate structures that kill,
but, as Arendt notes, the corporate employee “does
not regard himself as a murderer because he has not
done it out of inclination but in his professional
capacity.” At home the corporate man or woman is
meek. He or she has no proclivity to violence,
although the corporate systems they serve by day
pollute, impoverish, maim and kill. Those who do not
carry out acts of rebellion, no matter how small or
seemingly insignificant, are guilty of solidifying
and perpetuating these crimes. Those who do not act
delude themselves into believing they are innocent.
They are not.”
•••
Chris Hedges is a senior fellow at The Nation
Institute and a weekly columnist for Truthdig. His
newest book is “Death of the Liberal Class.” On Dec.
16 he, Daniel Ellsberg, Medea Benjamin, Ray
McGovern, Dr. Margaret Flowers and several others
will hold a rally across from the White House to
protest the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and attempt
to chain themselves to the White House fence. More
information on the Dec. 16 protest can be found at
www.stopthesewars.org.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add
Comments |