|
05 February 2011 By Juan Cole On Wednesday, the Mubarak regime showed its fangs,
mounting a massive and violent repressive attack on
the peaceful crowds in Tahrir Square in downtown
Cairo. People worrying about Egypt becoming like Iran
(scroll down) should worry about Egypt already being
way too much like Iran as it is. That is, Hillary
Clinton and others expressed anxiety in public about
increasing militarization of the Iranian regime and
use of military and paramilitaries to repress popular
protests. But Egypt is far more militarized and now is
using exactly the same tactics. Despite
efforts of the regime of
Hosni Mubarak to forestall it by
canceling trains to
Cairo and throwing up
checkpoints, masses of Egyptians poured into Tahrir
Square in downtown Cairo, as well into the downtown of
Alexandria, on Tuesday morning. At
Twitter,
courtesy
Google/ phone land line
(+16504194196
), we could read from Sharif Abdel Kouddous of Amy
Goodman's
Democracy Now!:
Sharifkouddous
Sharif Kouddous and Sharifkouddous Sharif Kouddous:
"Wow. It's 10am and already more people in Tahrir than
I have ever seen. And there's more flooding in #Egypt Other twitter reports say that
people are walking in to the capital from the
outskirts. There are an estimated 20 million people in
the Greater Cairo area, so it would be hard to isolate
it! The tens of thousands said to be thronging in
Egypt's two biggest cities are attempting, by the
sheer force of their
people power, to impress on Hosni
Mubarak that his government simply cannot survive.
The Egyptian army made
clear late Monday afternoon
Cairo time that it would not repress peaceful
demonstrations. A spokesman read out a statement on
television: The military said it was fanning out
through the streets to prevent looting and acts of
sabotage. It said that the military recognized the
legitimacy of the demands of the people and of the
demonstrators who are asking for vast political and
social adjustments. It said it would "never resort to
the use of force against this great people." Meanwhile, the newly appointed
vice president, Omar Suleiman of
military intelligence,
offered to open
negotiations with the demonstrators. Some analysts are interpreting
these statements as a two-pronged strategy. But I
wonder if they do not point to a split in the security
forces. Suleiman is from military intelligence, not
the
regular army. The
new prime minister,
Ahmad Shafiq,
is an officer from the relatively elite and pampered
air force (like Mubarak himself). The statement about not using
force on the people came from the regular army, which
is made up of a combination of
staff officers and thousands of
conscripts.
Army chief of staff Lt. Gen. Sami
Anan (Enan) may have decided to preserve the unity of
his branch of the
armed forces, the closest to the
people, by throwing the other three under the bus. As a
smart Pakistani analyst
put it: The Egyptian theatre now has
four key players Lt Gen Sami Annan,
Chief of Staff of the Egyptian
Army, Field Marshal Mohammed Hussein
Tantawi,
Defence Minister,
Air Marshal
Ahmed Shafiq, Minister for Civil
Aviation [and now Prime Minister], and Lt Gen Omar
Suleiman, the intelligence chief. Of the four, Lt Gen
Annan commands 468,000 troops,
Field Marshal
Tantawi oversees 60,000
Republican Guards while Lt Gen
Suleiman is rumoured to be ailing. Thus, Suleiman's offer to
negotiate is probably a way of trying to keep the
newly appointed military cabinet in power, perhaps
with an eye to new elections, by reaching out to and
perhaps bringing in from the cold at least some of the
opposition. Lt. Gen. Anan, in contrast, seems not to
care very much whether the Mubarak crew stays in power
or not, as long as the institution of the army is
safeguarded and law and order can be preserved. In a mass popular uprising of the
sort now ongoing in Egypt, unity of the military and
security forces, their backing for the ruler, and
willingness to be ruthless, are key to a government
remaining in power. This combination of factors was
present in
Iran in summer-fall, 2009. But
the news out of Cairo late Monday and into Tuesday
suggests deep divisions and diffidence in the
military, which bodes ill for Mubarak. Meanwhile, opposition leader
Mohamed Elbaradei
warned Mubarak that he had better flee if
he values his life. He said that crowds were no longer
simply calling for his resignation, but were beginning
to call for him to be put on trial. I watched some official
Egyptian television.
It is disgusting, with the same tone and snark of Fox
Cable News (which is calling the peaceful
demonstrators "rioters.") The anchor actually defended
the
security police for shooting down
dozens of people on Thursday and Friday. "What else
could they do?" A call came in from someone ranting
that it was all a
Muslim Brotherhood plot. Another
man insisted that a few people in the street did not
represent the whole people. You get a sense of what
the salon conversations of Marie Antoinette must have
been like in 1789. |