|
Let's stop beating around this Bush
Posted By Ben Tanosborn Congress simply refuses to get to the point, the country
only getting deliberations and resolutions that do nothing to
stop the war in Iraq while doing everything to tell the world
that we are an unrepentant, warmongering nation.
Our ancestors saw much merit in beating the bushes in order
to flush them for hunters. It made a lot of sense to them.
Could there be even greater merit for us today if we stop
beating around this Bush, and finally hold him accountable for
the mess he, knowingly and criminally, got us in?
Congress simply refuses to get to the point, the country
only getting deliberations and resolutions that do nothing to
stop the war in Iraq while doing everything to tell the world
that we are an unrepentant, warmongering nation. But while
acknowledging that, let's not rush to judgment by blaming
this indecisiveness, or apathy, solely on the legislators of
the 110th Congress, Republicans or Democrats. Congress people
may be just acting out what their constituents are really all
about.
Somehow a sizeable number of Americans, hopeful
progressives among them, thought that the country was poised
for a measurable change – at least in reference to the war
in Iraq – by having a spanking new Democratic Congress.
Wrong on two counts! First, this 110th Congress could hardly
be called a Democratic Congress. Second, Democrats, unlike the
fairly homogenous Republicans, come in a true rainbow of
denominations, from the bluish Jeffersonp-aine followers to
the reddish Republican wannabes.
How can anyone call the 110th a Democratic Congress?
Control of the Senate is being held hostage by a single vote;
the super-vote of an elected Independent, three-term Senate
Democrat, and truly an Ameri-Likudian at heart: Joe Lieberman.
For all intents and purposes, Senator Reid only commands a
ghost majority, particularly on war and foreign policy issues.
As for the House, Speaker pelosi doesn't have a clear,
ideologically-clean, overriding majority; not when well over
10 percent of her Democratic troops are but wolves in
sheep's clothing, ranging from moderate to ultra
conservatives.
So, expect nothing from this Congress on the War in Iraq on
domestic issues on anything. Nothing of substance that can
bring a message loud and clear… a message telling us, and
the world, that Bush's America is nothing but a nightmare of
the recent past. Unfortunately, the bad dream remains very
much with us, even if some people decided last November to
give Tweedledee the vote, instead of Tweedledum or, is it the
other way around? Change in America is not likely to be
initiated by Congress, at least not by this 110th Congress.
If Americans want change, and they really mean it, they
must force it at the local and state level, and forget about
the people they've sent to the Capitol in D.C. It's the
small towns and big cities that need to make declarations
rebuking America's foreign policy and its byproduct: war,
war and more war; rebuking jointly the president and the Vice
president and calling for both their impeachments. Until there
is such a groundswell of public opinion, and it becomes
conclusive that we must stop beating around this Bush, there
will be little hope for change, and definitely no end to the
involvement in Iraq.
A few communities have already sounded off via their
elected officials in City Hall. And, Vermont has recently done
its patriotic deed as well. But little else has happened; most
people willing to wait for the natural turn of events: the
2008 presidential election.
So, although a majority of Americans now readily accept the
premise that they were lied to before Iraq's invasion; or
that the prospect of terrorism looms larger now than before;
or that the US level of credibility with much of the world is
in shambles, none of those things seem to matter much, so the
prospect of impeachment ranges from zero to none.
In matters of peace and war, societal compassion plays the
key role. And we don't seem to have that. Results from
recent studies that were conducted to measure human compassion
www.LiveScience.com indicate that although we may be moved by
the suffering or death of one specific person, we become
insensitive to the suffering or death of many, becoming
oblivious to a My Lai, or a Haditha, or a Fallujah, wars,
genocides or holocausts. I don't know whether the studies
look exclusively at the psychological, social, political and
institutional makeup of just Americans… or if it's a
humankind sort of a thing. In either case, it is a sad result,
one that many of us suspected, but preferred or pretended that
it not be true.
If compassion will not move Americans to impeach Bush,
perhaps economic issues will. We are unlikely to make it to
the next presidential election before it's discovered that
we had a multi-year weak economy masked by pseudo wealth
creation, and spending, resulting from a housing market that
was shaping as a house of cards. And as that house of cards
falls, something now at its very early stages, it won't be
long before millions of Americans – short on compassion, and
long on greed – turn their backs to Bush, blaming him for
his share of the problem… as well as theirs. For the lack of
compassion, some may think of this outcome as sweet revenge.
|