61,000 Iranians Forced to Pay for Their Regime's Wrongdoing
09 September 2016
By Salman Al-dossary
On July 31, 1987 — an infamous day in the history of the Muslim hajj — Iranian
pilgrims stormed the holy city of Mecca, chanting political slogans of the
Tehran regime, and clashed with Saudi security. More than 400 died, including
Iranians, pilgrims of other nationalities, and Saudi police. The tragedy also
proved painful to countless more Iranians over the three years that followed,
in that Tehran barred its own people from going on Hajj until diplomatic
relations with Saudi Arabia were provisionally restored in 1991.
This year, for the fourth time since the country's 1979 revolution, the regime
again announced that it would permit no Iranian pilgrims to participate in the
Hajj — effectively holding its own citizens' religious obligation hostage in
order to make a political point. Nearly 61,000 Iranian Muslim pilgrims had
already booked and paid for their travel to Mecca.
Iran's cynical use of religion in a game of politics impressed no one, except
perhaps for its Lebanese proxy ''Hezbollah'' and other militias owing fealty
to the Mullahs, which seem to have cheered the move. The regime was
transparent: It initiated the restriction on its own citizens' pilgrimage. It
did not even bother to allege, as it had done falsely in the past, that Saudi
Arabia refused to let them in.
Saudi Arabia simply does not play games with pilgrims. Amid the many conflicts
that have marred the region in past decades, the Kingdom has taken great pains
to ensure that the holy sanctuaries are accessible to all Muslims, regardless
of their political loyalties or countries of origin. And over the past 37
years of strain in Iranian-Saudi relations, Riyadh did not wait for Tehran to
resolve its disputes with the Kingdom before granting Hajj visas to Iranian
nationals.
This year, though diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran have been
severed, Riyadh took substantial measures to ensure that Iranian citizens were
not denied their religious right to Hajj. It green-lighted their transport to
Mecca via Iranian carriers, waiving the sanctions that had been placed on some
of those companies. The Kingdom also fostered the establishment of an Iranian
interest section in Jeddah, under the auspices of the Swiss embassy. The
initiative was meant to enable an Iranian government official to cooperate
with Saudi Arabia, on Saudi soil, in processing the incoming Iranian pilgrims
and tending to their needs. With respect to the pilgrims themselves, the
Kingdom exempted them from the traditional requirement of paper visa
processing, granting them the chance to apply solely online in order to make
the process logistically easier. But the Kingdom could not, alas, free the
pilgrims from their own government.
There will be Iranians in Mecca this year: those wishing to go on Hajj who
reside not inside Iran but in North America, Europe, Africa, and any part of
the world where they do not face restrictions on their freedom of movement.
Tehran, meanwhile, has dredged up another old trick from its revolutionary
playbook: organized demonstrations under the banner, ''absolution from
infidels.'' That was the slogan which Khomeini had instructed his supporters
to chant in Mecca dating back to 1971. It was eventually joined by the more
familiar calls of ''Death to America,'' ''Death to Israel,'' and the like. In
injecting his militant brand of politics into Islam's holiest rites, Khomeini
only tainted his supporters' ritual practice and jeopardized their lives. And
this year, the Tehran regime has itself created the situation in which such
chants will not be heard in Mecca — only in Iran, and presumably the enclaves
in Arab lands which its proxy militias now occupy.
It is regrettable for all Muslims that 61,000 Iranians will not be able to
join their brothers and sisters from around the world in Mecca this year.
Their absence is testimony to a greater tragedy, borne out each day in our
region through senseless sectarian violence stoked by the Tehran regime: While
the Mullahs may speak of distant enemies and ''infidels,'' the first victims
of their policies are always Muslims.
Salman Aldosary is the editor-in-chief of Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments