Is
Obama Really Preparing For Civil War?
23 December 2009By
Chuck Baldwin
According to an obscure report in the European Union
Times (EUTimes.net) , "Russian Military Analysts are
reporting to Prime Minister Putin that US President
Barack Obama has issued an order to his Northern
Command's (USNORTHCOM) top leader, US Air Force
General Gene Renuart, to 'begin immediately'
increasing his military forces to 1 million troops by
January 30, 2010, in what these reports warn is an
expected outbreak of civil war within the United
States before the end of winter.
"According to these reports, Obama has had over these
past weeks 'numerous' meetings with his war council
abut how best to manage the expected implosion of his
Nation's banking system while at the same time
attempting to keep the United States military hegemony
over the World in what Russian Military Analysts state
is a 'last ditch gambit' whose success is 'far from
certain.'"
The EU Times article continues by saying, "To the
fears of Obama over the United States erupting into
civil war once the full extent of the rape and
pillaging of these peoples by their banks and
government becomes known to them, grim evidence now
shows the likelihood of this occurring much sooner
than later."
The Times story goes on to say that there are "over
220 million American people armed to the teeth and
ready to explode."
The Times article concludes by saying, "Though the
coming civil war in the United States is being
virtually ignored by their propaganda media, the same
cannot be said of Russia, where leading Russian
political analyst, Professor Igor Panarin has long
warned that the economic turmoil in the United States
has confirmed his long-held view that the US is
heading for collapse."
Many of us would be inclined to pooh-pooh such a
story, but then there is this column from
Bloomberg.com entitled "Arming Goldman With Pistols
Against Public," written by Alice Schroeder. According
to Ms Schroeder:
"'I just wrote my first reference for a gun permit,'
said a friend, who told me of swearing to the good
character of a Goldman Sachs Group Inc. banker who
applied to the local police for a permit to buy a
pistol. The banker had told this friend of mine that
senior Goldman people have loaded up on firearms and
are now equipped to defend themselves if there is a
populist uprising against the bank."
There is no doubt that the American people have good
reason to despise these international banksters
epitomized by Goldman Sachs. Even one of Goldman's
poster-boys, Henry Paulson, US Treasury secretary and
former Goldman CEO, admitted that the American people
were fed up. Schroeder quotes Paulson as saying,
during testimony to Congress last summer, "[People]
were unhappy with the big discrepancies in wealth, but
they at least believed in the system and in some form
of market-driven capitalism. But if we had a complete
meltdown, it could lead to people questioning the
basis of the system."
Schroeder correctly opines, "There you have it. The
bailout was meant to keep the curtain drawn on the way
the rich make money, not from the free market, but
from the lack of one. Goldman Sachs blew its cover
when the firm's revenue from trading reached a record
$27 billion in the first nine months of this year, and
a public that was writhing in financial agony caught
on that the profits earned on taxpayer capital were
going to pay employee bonuses."
Schroeder concludes her column by saying, "And if the
proles [proletariat: plebs, working class, peasants]
really do appear brandishing pitchforks at the doors
of Park Avenue and the gates of Round Hill Road, you
can be sure that the Goldman guys and their families
will be holed up in their safe rooms with their
firearms."
So, do Wall Street and Russian analysts know something
that we don't know? Is this why George W. Bush
initiated USNORTHCOM to begin with? Is this why Barack
Obama is beefing up USNORTHCOM? This would help
explain the reports of all those potential detention
camps that have been constructed (including the
abandoned military installations that have refurbished
security fences, guard towers, etc., around them). Has
the American people's disgust with these crooks and
thieves within the federal government and Wall Street
reached a boiling point?
There is no question that people are angry, and for
good reason.
The fraudulent financial policies of the Federal
Reserve and its lackeys in the White House and
Congress have literally bankrupted the country. Real
unemployment is most likely over 20%. Taxes (along
with costly fees, regulations, restrictions,
penalties, mandates, etc.) at every level are going
through the ceiling. America's jobs have been
outsourced. Barack Obama continues G.W. Bush's
irresponsibility, digging America deeper and deeper
into foreign entanglements, at the cost of trillions
of dollars and thousands of lives. The IRS continues
to harass and harangue honest citizens, squeezing them
like the proverbial turnip. And now, add the insanity
of a global climate treaty being hammered out in
Copenhagen, and a universal health care bill being
rammed through Congress, and the outlook is even
gloomier.
I feel very comfortable in saying that the usurpations
of power, the encroachments upon liberty, and the
arrogant tax-and-spend policies emanating from
Washington, D.C., and Wall Street these days are far
more egregious than what George Washington and the
boys were enduring in 1775-76 at the hands of the
British Crown. There is no doubt in my mind that if
Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Sam Adams were
alive today, they would have given cause for the
Goldman Sachs banksters to retreat to their bunkers
years ago!
The fact is, we do need a revolution! But not a
revolution of anarchy and pitchforks. (The history of
France should be ample evidence of the futility of
this strategy.) We need a revolution of the individual
states: to reclaim their sovereignty and fight for the
liberties of their sovereigns (We the People). That is
exactly what our forefathers did in '76.
America's founding document (the Declaration of
Independence) declares that our states are "free and
independent. " And so they are. We are not "one
nation" with one all-powerful central government. We
are a confederation of nation-states, united in a
voluntary union, with each State reserving to itself
the power and authority of self-determination, and
ceding to the federal government limited, specifically
delineated duties and limitations- -limitations that
have been totally ignored to the point that, for all
intents and purposes, our once-great constitutional
republic has been thoroughly expunged. Therefore, it
is NOW time for the states to stand up to this
meddlesome, every-growing tyranny that is known as
Washington, D.C., and defend the rights and liberties
of their citizens!
What Dr. Ed Vieira (an attorney with 4 earned degrees
from Harvard, who has successfully argued cases before
the US Supreme Court) wrote a few weeks ago should
serve as a template for every State governor and
legislature that truly cares about liberty. See Ed's
column at:
http://www.newswith views.com/ Vieira/edwin201. htm
As Vieira says, the states should resurrect their
militias. Many--if not all--states have the legal
authority for such entities in their constitutions. In
some states they are called the State Guard. Some
plainly use the word "militia." Whatever they are
called, they need to be activated. And all that is
necessary for this to be accomplished is the order of
the governor. It's that simple!
And as Vieira said, states need to adopt an
alternative currency--including , and most especially,
gold and silver. In other words, they need to develop
their own private economies, complete with their own
banks and exchange mediums. They also need to reject
the multinational agribusiness and develop their own
in-State agricultural and energy businesses.
I would dare say that the first State that determines
to follow Vieira's sagacious counsel (and rumblings of
this have already begun in states such as Alaska,
Oklahoma, Texas, Montana, New Hampshire, Indiana,
Tennessee, South Carolina, etc.) would have so many
liberty-loving patriots flock there that its economy
would explode with prosperity-- resulting in a domino
effect of many other states following suit--and the
revolution that this country so desperately needs
would indeed take place. Furthermore, such a
revolution would be constitutional, lawful, moral,
and, yes, in compliance with the laws of Nature and of
Nature's God.
In the meantime, is Barack Obama really worried about
civil war? He might be. It is my observation that
Washington politicians and bureaucrats are the most
paranoid people on the planet. The problem is--as with
most power-hungry Machiavellians- -their paranoia
often translates into more oppression and less liberty
for the citizenry. And if this is true, it simply
means that the states need to hurry up and do what
needs to be done!
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments