Alan Dershowitz on Judge Goldstone: “But now I see him
as a traitor… It’s as if they would have taken a Jew
to edit the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. He uses
his Jewish last name to kosher his slander of the
Jewish People.”
For those who still
cannot make their minds up about Jewish nationalism
and the Zionist violent abuse of Western academic
culture (tolerance, academic freedom, pluralism etc)
Rabbi Shmully Hecht of Yale’s University Jewish
society, gives an exemplary opportunity to see it all.
Rabbi Hecht confronted Judge Goldstone last week while
Goldstone was delivering an address at Yale
University. Rabbi Hecht and his supporters held up a
sign at the back of the conference room equating the
Goldstone report with the Protocols of the Elders of
Zion and the Dreyfus affair.
(See video: Rabbi confronts Richard Goldstone at
Yale University)
For a while, the
Dreyfus affair and the Protocols were pretty effective
Zionist propaganda tools, they were used mainly to
silence criticism of Jewish power, Jewish lobbying and
Israel. However, it is about time to face the truth.
Drawing a parallel
between the Dreyfus affair, The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion and the Goldstone report can also
produce an interesting insight, but not for the
reasons Rabbi Hecht or Dershowitz suggest. It allows
us to look at Zionism in an historical perspective. We
can review where Zionism started from and what it
matured into.
The Dreyfus affair was
a political scandal that divided France in the 1890s
and the early 1900s. It involved the conviction for
treason in 1894 of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a young
French artillery officer of Jewish descent. The
Dreyfus affair had a huge impact on Herzl, the father
of Zionism, who was assigned by a Viennese paper to
cover the trial. Soon afterward, Herzl wrote Der
Judenstaat (The Jewish State, 1896) and founded the
World Zionist Organization.
During the last
century Zionists regarded the Dreyfus Affair as an
exemplary case of anti Semitism motivated by racial
discrimination. In fact the Zionists were wrong. For a
century they have been misleading themselves and
others. French society at the time was divided about
Dreyfus. The Left and the intelligentsia rushed to
support the young officer, which led eventually to a
2nd trial.
Dreyfus was exonerated
and reinstated as a Major in the French Army in 1906.
However, the case of Goldstone is totally different.
The images of the IDF’s white phosphorus shells
bursting over UN refugee shelters are engraved in our
collective memory. As if this is not enough, initial
Israeli denial of the usage of white phosphorous is
also stored in our minds. The perception that Israel
committed a massacre in broad daylight is not going to
be wiped out either.
Unlike divided France
that couldn’t make up its mind about Dreyfus, we are
not divided about Israel being a criminal state and
the biggest threat to world peace. The repulsion
towards Israel and its brutality is actually a growing
unifying force amongst humanists, peace lovers and the
world at large. Israel will not be exonerated and
considering the fact that it defines itself as the
Jewish state, its crimes reflect disastrously on Jews
as a collective, something that not even a dozen
Jewish anti Zionist activists around the world can
change. From an historical perspective it is rather
clear that Israel has been very successful in
exhausting the last drops of sympathy garnered for the
idea of Jewish nationalism. As it happens, not a
single humanist stands up against Goldstone or his
balanced report.
But the truth must be
said. As much as humanists are united behind the
Goldstone report, our democratically elected leaders
are failing to confront Israel and its Jewish lobbies.
They rush to appease AIPAC, they pocket money given by
Zionist lords and Israeli Lobbies.
In the last century we
have been witnessing an evolving murderous Jewish
nationalist movement. For a century, the Zionist
movement has managed to silence its critics using
different tactics that are all explored in that
fictional text (Protocols of the Elders of Zion) from
1903. Zionism was very successful; it managed to
mature into a state, at the expense of the Palestinian
people. Only through violent expansionist methods
including massacres and racially orientated ethnic
cleansing have the Zionists and Israel managed to
fulfill what they define as the Jewish national
aspiration. But as Goldstone reveals, this aspiration
matured into a criminal state that is terrorizing its
indigenous population and threatening its neighbours
If we ever want to
amend the reality we live in, we must curtail the
Zionist operators in our midst, in the government, in
politics, in the media, in academia, in finance and in
the legal system. I am not talking here about Jews but
about Zionists, people who are affiliated with a
specific foreign tribal interest that counters
universalism, ethics and humanism. Unless we do that
we may soon have to face another Goldstone report
investigating a much greater Zionist crime against
humanity.
If we want to help
Israelis and Jewish nationalists recover from their
nationalist racist fanatical dream, we must persuade
them that the Goldstone report is their new Bible, a
recent catalogue of their departure from humanity.
-- Gilad Atzmon (gilad.co.uk)
is an Israeli-born writer and jazz musician living in
London. He had previously served in the Israeli
military but he is currently an anti-racism
campaigner. His latest CD is In Loving Memory of
America.