24 February 2010By Keith Johnson
The quote often recited off Joe Stack’s “so-called”
manifesto (more appropriately referred to as a suicide
note) is that “violence is the only way.” Is it?
While some may agree with that statement, I would
argue to the contrary. In recent years, those leading
a peaceful resistance movement against government
corruption have made significant progress. By
utilizing a wide range of available venues they have
made their voices heard and, by doing so, managed to
disseminate a great deal of truth and effect real and
tangible change.
Still some are unconvinced. Some believe that all
peaceful roads have lead to a dead end and that the
only option left is to strike out violently. But would
a draconian carbon treaty have been defeated by flying
a plane into the Copenhagen conference? Would
nightmarish healthcare legislation been stalled by
taking a gun to the floor of the house and senate? I
think not!
Such actions only work to the advantage of those
whom you have targeted. One should be reminded that in
the absence of such real organic threats, governments
often resort to provocateur events like this to
crackdown on those that challenge their authority. So
what are to we to make of a man like Joe Stack?
Certainly this tortured soul is worthy of our
sympathy. But assuming that this was an authentic
attack perpetrated by a man who was just pushed too
far, are his actions really worthy of the kind of
celebratory exuberance we are now witnessing in small
segments of the patriot community and elsewhere?
Since the attack on the
Echelon
Building in Austin, Joe Stack has emerged as some kind
of folk hero.
Facebook
accounts have been opened in his honor, web forums
sing his praises and comment boards are replete with
comments like “Way to go, Joe” and “The war is on!”
And although this reflects a genuine anger and
frustration by a large segment of our population, I
fear that some may interpret this as a “call to arms”,
or others still may gleam inspiration and perhaps even
entertain the notion of following in Stack’s
footsteps.
So before any of you start loading your magazines
and marching away to help kick off the next “American
Revolution”, please stop for a moment and
consider one possible scenario that may have unfolded
that fateful day when Joe Stack flew his plane into
the IRS…
At the
Department of Homeland Security, several
officials watch the coverage on FOX News and rise to
their feet cheering! They’re happy knowing that their
jobs are safe and that they are likely to have several
million dollars more allocated to their budgets to
combat domestic terrorism. On the floor of the house,
more congressmen are pressure to advance draconian
legislation that further infringes on the rights and
privacy of their citizens. Somewhere in the Mid-West,
dozens of police officers attending an SPLC seminar
are now convinced that white, Christian tax protestors
are a grave and serious threat to national security.
In the CEO’s office of a mobile X-ray/body scanning
manufacturer, executives pop the corks off their
champagne bottles to celebrate a rise in their
companies stock options. Throughout the globe,
journalists and bloggers feverishly type out “I told
you so” articles and essays that draw the “fence
sitters” to their way of thinking. Across the United
States, police chiefs instruct their officer’s to turn
up the heat on anyone who even looks like they might
be carrying a grudge against the government.
That’s right, you’re not the only one with an itchy
trigger finger. I often hear that the
American gun owners outnumber the government
ten to one. This may be true. But did you ever
consider that a vast majority of gun owners might turn
those guns on you. A lot of those people are very
sympathetic to the government and consider allegiance
to the government on par with allegiance to America.
Remember that the “Shot
Heard Round the World” was not a preemptive
attack by American Revolutionaries…it was provoked.
And if you’re not familiar with your American history,
here’s a good opportunity to brush up on it…
When on the night of the 18th of April, 1775,
Paul Revere rode beneath the bright moonlight
through Lexington to Concord, with Dawes and Prescott
for comrades, he was carrying the signal for the
independence of a nation. He had seen across the
Charles
River the two lights from the church-steeple in
Boston which were to show that a British force was
going out to seize the patriotic supplies at Concord;
he had warned Hancock and Adams at Rev. Jonas Clark's
parsonage in Lexington, and had rejected Sergeant
Monroe's caution against unnecessary noise, with the
rejoinder, "You'll have noise enough here before long:
the regulars are coming out." As he galloped on his
way the regulars were advancing with steady step
behind him, soon warned of their own danger by
alarm-bells and signal-guns. When Revere was captured
by some British officers who happened to be near
Concord, Colonel Smith, the commander of the
expedition, had already halted, ordered Pitcairn
forward, and sent back prudently for reinforcements.
It was a night of terror to all the neighboring
Middlesex towns, for no one knew what excesses
the angry British troops might commit on their return
march..
Before 5 A.M. on April 19, 1775, the British
troops had reached Lexington Green, where thirty-eight
men, under Captain Parker, stood up before six hundred
or eight hundred to be shot at, their captain saying,
"Don't fire unless you are fired on; but if
they want a war, let it begin here." It began
there; they were fired upon; they fired rather
ineffectually in return, while seven were killed and
nine wounded. The rest, after retreating, reformed and
pursued the British towards Concord, capturing seven
stragglers,--the first prisoners taken in the war.
Then followed the fight at Concord, where four
hundred and fifty Americans, instead of thirty-eight,
were rallied to meet the British. The fighting took
place between two detachments at the North Bridge,
where
"once the embattled farmers stood, And fired
the shot heard round the world."
There the American, captain, Isaac Davis, was
killed at the first shot, --he who had said, when his
company was placed at the head of the little column,
"I haven't a man that is afraid to go." He fell, and
Major Buttrick gave the order, "Fire! for God's sake,
fire!" in return. The British detachment retreated in
disorder, but their main body was too strong to be
attacked, so they disabled a few cannon, destroyed
some barrels of flour, cut down the liberty-pole, set
fire to the court-house, and then began their return
march. It ended in a flight; they were exposed to a
constant guerilla fire; minute-men flocked behind
every tree and house; and only the foresight of
Colonel Smith in sending for reinforcements had
averted a surrender. At 2 P. M., near Lexington, Percy
with his troops met the returning fugitives, and
formed a hollow square, into which they ran and threw
themselves on the ground exhausted. Then Percy in turn
fell back. Militia still came pouring in from
Dorchester, Milton, Dedham, as well as the nearer
towns. A company from Danvers marched sixteen miles in
four hours.
The
Americans lost ninety-three in killed, wounded,
and missing that day; the British, two hundred and
seventy-three. But the important result was that every
American colony now recognized that war had
begun. (from Vol.II of the Great
Republic)
The lesson here? He who shoots first...loses! There
is still so much more work left to be done and there
is nothing that can be accomplished through violent,
preemptive measures…leave that to the war criminals.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments