|
15 March 2010 By Dahr Jamail Under Saddam Hussein, women in government got a
year’s maternity leave; that is now cut to six months.
Under the Personal Status Law in force since Jul. 14,
1958, when Iraqis overthrew the British-installed
monarchy, Iraqi women had most of the rights that
Western women do. Now they have Article 2 of the Constitution: “Islam
is the official religion of the state and is a basic
source of legislation.” Sub-head A says “No law can be
passed that contradicts the undisputed rules of
Islam.” Under this Article the interpretation of
women’s rights is left to religious leaders – and many
of them are under Iranian influence. “The U.S. occupation has decided to let go of
women’s rights,” Yanar Mohammed who campaigns for
women’s rights in Iraq says. “Political Islamic groups
have taken southern Iraq, are fully in power there,
and are using the financial support of Iran to recruit
troops and allies. The financial and political support
from Iran is why the Iraqis in the south accept this,
not because the Iraqi people want Islamic law.” With the new law has come the new lawlessness. Nora
Hamaid, 30, a graduate from Baghdad University, has
now given up the career she dreamt of. “I completed my
studies before the invaders arrived because there was
good security and I could freely go to university,”
Hamaid tells IPS. Now she says she cannot even move
around freely, and worries for her children every day.
“I mean every day, from when they depart to when they
return from school, for fear of abductions.” There is 25 percent representation for women in
parliament, but Sabria says “these women from party
lists stand up to defend their party in the
parliament, not for women’s rights.” For women in
Iraq, the invasion is not over. The situation for Iraq’s women reflects the overall
situation: everyone is affected by lack of security
and lack of infrastructure. “The status of women here is linked to the general
situation,” Maha Sabria, professor of political
science at Al-Nahrain University in Baghdad tells IPS.
“The violation of women’s rights was part of the
violation of the rights of all Iraqis.” But, she said,
“women bear a double burden under occupation because
we have lost a lot of freedom because of it. “More men are now under the weight of detention, so
now women bear the entire burden of the family and are
obliged to provide full support to the families and
children. At the same time women do not have freedom
of movement because of the deteriorated security
conditions and because of abductions of women and
children by criminal gangs.” Women, she says, are also now under pressure to
marry young in family hope that a husband will bring
security. Sabria tells IPS that the abduction of women “did
not exist prior to the occupation. We find that women
lost their right to learn and their right to a free
and normal life, so Iraqi women are struggling with
oppression and denial of all their rights, more than
ever before.” Yanar Mohammed believes the constitution neither
protects women nor ensures their basic rights. She
blames the United States for abdicating its
responsibility to help develop a pluralistic democracy
in Iraq. “The real ruler in Iraq now is the rule of old
traditions and tribal, backward laws,” Sabria says.
“The biggest problem is that more women in Iraq are
unaware of their rights because of the backwardness
and ignorance prevailing in Iraqi society today.” Many women have fled Iraq because their husband was
arbitrarily arrested by occupation forces or
government security personnel, says Sabria. More than four million Iraqis were estimated to
have been displaced through the occupation, including
approximately 2.8 million internally. The rest live as
refugees mainly in neighbouring countries, according
to a report by Elizabeth Ferris, co-director of the
Brookings Institution-University of Bern Project on
Internal Displacement. The report, titled, ‘Going Home? Prospects and
Pitfalls For Large-Scale Return Of Iraqis’, says most
displaced Iraqi women are reluctant to return home
because of continuing uncertainties. The Washington-based Refugees International (RI)
says in a report ‘Iraqi Refugees: Women’s Rights and
Security Critical to Returns’ that “Iraqi women will
resist returning home, even if conditions improve in
Iraq, if there is no focus on securing their rights as
women and assuring their personal security and their
families’ well-being.” The RI report covered internally displaced women in
Iraq’s semi-autonomous northern Kurdish region and
female refugees in Syria. “Not one woman interviewed
by RI indicated her intention to return,” the report
says. “This tent is more comfortable than a palace in
Baghdad; my family is safe here,” a displaced woman in
northern Iraq told RI. The situation continues to be challenging for women
within Iraq. “I am an employee, and everyday go to my work
place, and the biggest challenge for me and all the
suffering Iraqis is the roads are closed and you feel
you are a person without rights, without respect,” a
35-year-old government employee, who asked to be
referred to as Iman, told IPS. “To what extent has this improved my security,” she
asked. “We have better salaries now, but how can women
live with no security? How can we enjoy our rights if
there is no safe place to go, for rest and recreation
and living?” (*Abdu, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in
close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based
specialist writer on Iraq who reports extensively on
the region) |