|
20 March 2010
By Stephen Lendman Its
web site (thelawfareproject.org) calls Lawfare: "The
use of the law as a weapon of war."
Fact Check
Provided they contradict no others, laws are
sacrosanct, especially fundamental international ones
like the UN Charter, Four Geneva Conventions, their
Common Article 3, the Rome Statute, Nuremberg Tribunal
and judgment, Genocide Convention, Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, and many others - ones
Israel and America are sworn to uphold but
consistently violate with impunity.
Lawfare Project (LP) claim: "The abuse of the law and
legal systems (is used) for strategic or military
ends."
Fact Check
International law is clear and unequivocal. The UN
Charter explains under what conditions violence and
coercion by one state against another are justified.
Article 2(3) and Article 33(1) require peaceful
settlement of international disputes. Article 2(4)
prohibits force or its threatened use, and Article 51
allows the "right of individual or collective
self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a
Member....until the Security Council has taken
measures to maintain international peace and
security." In
other words, justifiable self-defense is permitted,
and Articles 2(3), 2(4), and 33(1) absolutely prohibit
all unilateral threats or use of force not allowed
under Article 51 or authorized by the Security
Council. Even then, under Fourth Geneva, civilians are
"protected persons" off-limits to attack. Doing it is
a war crime.
Claim: Law is used to "thwart free speech about issues
of national security and public concern."
Fact Check Free
expression is recognized as a human right under
Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, Article 19 of the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), among other
international laws. Yet
Israel has no constitution or specific laws
guaranteeing equality or free expression. However, its
Basic Laws protect human dignity and liberty as
fundamental values in "a Jewish and democratic state,"
including: --
"no violation of the life, body or dignity or any
person;" --
their property; --
their liberty, neither by imprisonment, arrest,
extradition or otherwise; --
the right to privacy; and --
much more, including a traditionally mostly free and
open media within certain limits most states impose.
Nonetheless, Israel violates its own law and
international ones by imposing censorship as it sees
fit. For example, during Operation Cast Lead when it
restricted on-the-scene coverage to suppress its
crimes of war and against humanity, now revealed in
detail but ruthlessly assailed as untrue.
Despite America's First Amendment, the dominant US
media self-censor, and in war zones, the Pentagon
allows no independent coverage, instead using
"embedded" journalists of its choosing.
Claim: "Law (is) used to de-legitimize the sovereignty
of democratic states."
Fact Check No
state, democratic of otherwise, has the right to
violate fundamental international laws nor remain
unaccountable when they do. Israel and America are
serial offenders.
Claim: The law is used to "frustrate the ability of
democracies to defend themselves against terrorism."
Fact Check
Israel and America are democracies in name only,
granting rights to the privileged, not the majority,
and in Israel solely to Jews.
International law permits self-defense against
violence or armed attacks. Terrorism is committed by
the perpetrators.
Lawfare's anti-democratic issues include:
Claim: The illegitimacy of "legal limits" in fighting
"terrorism."
Fact Check Most
serious is institutionalized state terrorism,
including premeditated wars and targeted
assassinations, criminal acts under international law,
permitting self-defense against them.
Claim: No international law restricts nations from
acting within or outside their territory.
Fact Check
Universally accepted international laws place clear
and unequivocal limits, calling violations crimes of
war and against humanity.
Claim: An international tribunal has no authority to
hold sovereign states accountable.
Fact Check
International law created a tribunal as a legal entity
to prosecute individuals for crimes of war, against
humanity, and genocide in cases when guilty states
fail to do so.
Claim: There are legitimate and illegitimate
criticisms of religion.
Fact Check
Criticism is one thing. Vilifying one religion in
defense of another is clearly indefensible. Further,
international laws strictly prohibit persecuting,
killing, or otherwise harming persons of other faiths,
practices Israel and America repeatedly commit.
Claim: Lawfare uses its own definition of inciting
violence.
Fact Check LP
calls self-defense violence and terrorism,
premeditated aggression self-defense, including
against innocent civilians.
Claim: Undefined hate speech should be banned.
Fact Check
International law protects free expression. Only when
it crosses the line egregiously can it be questioned.
Banning it is another matter, and without defining it,
what is hate speech? Clearly, LP means any criticism
of Israeli and American policies.
Claim: LP calls Universal Jurisdiction (UJ)
illegitimate when it conflicts with "national security
interests."
Fact Check UJ
is a well-established principle, used by America
(against Liberia's Chuckie Taylor), Israel (against
Adolph Eichmann) and other nations as a legitimate law
enforcement tool for crimes of war and against
humanity. All nations may use it.
Claim: LP advocates denying "terrorists" and "unlawful
combatants" their rights.
Fact Check By
law, everyone is innocent unless or until proved
guilty with substantive facts to prove it. The term
"unlawful combatant" is unrecognized in international
law and has no standing.
Claim: LP wants lawyers denied "classified material"
to prosecute persons accused of torture.
Fact Check No
relevant information should ever be withheld for any
reason to protect alleged torturers or other
criminals.
Claim: LP wants a majority bloc of UN states denied
their right to enforce human rights policy.
Fact Check
International laws protect human rights. Nations and
individuals in violation should be held fully
accountable.
Claim: LP wants to suppress legitimate human rights
reports critical of Israel and America.
Fact Check It
objects to Goldstone Commission and other human rights
groups' revelations of Israeli crimes of war and
against humanity during Operation Cast Lead to
absolve its perpetrator's and America's (as a
co-conspirator) of any culpability for their
lawlessness.
Claim: LP calls Israel's Separation Wall legitimate.
Fact Check
Israel's Separation Wall is being built on 12% of
confiscated Palestinian land. In 2004, the
International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled it illegal,
and ordered it dismantled.
Claim: Like America and Israel, LP calls Hamas a
terrorist entity.
Fact Check In
January 2006, Hamas was democratically elected as
Palestine's legitimate government, what it remains
today despite Israel and Washington's recognition of
Fatah's coup d'etat regime under a president whose
term expired 14 months ago.
Claim: LP calls hate speech legitimate for "radical"
Islam and "terrorism."
Fact Check Hate
or any other type speech is never legitimate when it
lies about or vilifies one religion in defense of
another.
Claim: LP opposes applying the rule of law, due
process, equal justice, civil and human rights, and
fundamental democratic principles for governments or
groups it opposes.
Fact Check
Advocating lawlessness is never legitimate under any
circumstances, ever, for any reason.
The Lawfare
Project's First Conference
Sponsored by the Committee on Foreign and
International Law of NYCLA (NY Collegiate Learning
Assessment) and the Conference of Presidents of Major
American Jewish Organizations on March 11, its first
US conference was held in New York, co-chaired by: --
Irwin Cotler - law professor, Canadian MP, and former
Minister of Justice and Attorney General from 2003 -
2006; --
Robert Morgenthau - former District Attorney for New
York County, borough of Manhattan, and US Attorney for
the Southern District of New York; and --
David Schizer - Dean, Columbia University School of
Law.
Invited speakers included:
John Bolton He's
a Project for the New American Century (PNAC) member,
senior fellow at the right-wing American Enterprise
Institute, and Bush administration's recess-appointed
UN Ambassador, a man Law Professor, author, activist,
and former President of the National Lawyers Guild,
Marjorie Cohn, accused of "cooking intelligence to
whip up US aggression against other countries,"
including, of course, Iraq based on bogus WMD claims. In
his UN post, he was also notorious for "hyping threats
posed by Cuba and Syria, and taking a dangerously
combative stance toward North Korea." He now advocates
war against Iran, getting op-ed space in publications
like the Wall Street Journal, again to hype fear.
Dore Gold He's
a former Israeli UN Ambassador, President of the
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, and served in
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's first
administration as Foreign Policy Advisor. He was also
an advisor to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and a member
of Israel's delegation at the 1991 Madrid Peace
Conference and 1998 Wye River negotiations with the
Palestinian National Authority (PA). He's a notorious
right-wing extremist, hostile to democratic principles
and Palestinian rights.
David Scharia He's
a former First Senior Deputy at the Supreme Court
Division of Israel's Attorney General's office, a
position in which he was the lead attorney in major
counterterrorism cases before Israel's High Court (HCJ).
He also headed the CT Internal Investigations Unit,
was Chair of the Inter-Ministerial Counterterrorism
Committee, and was a member of the experts' forum on
"Democracy and Terrorism," established by the Israel
Democratic Institute. Most recently, he's been Legal
Officer at the Security Council's Counter Terrorism
Executive Directorate (CTED).
Gabriela Shalev
She's currently Israeli UN Ambassador, former Hebrew
University of Jerusalem law professor, president of
the Academic Council, and Rector of Ono Academic
College in Israel. She's an expert in contract law and
procurement contracts, and was chief legal editor of
the Judgments of Israel's HCJ and Hebrew
Encyclopedia.
Francois-Henri
Briard He's
a longtime litigator before France's Supreme Court,
has represented US companies in France, and is active
in arbitration. He also worked on economic
intelligence, is a member of the Historical Society of
the US Supreme Court, and is president of the
Vergennes Institute, that he co-founded with Justice
Antonin Scalia to foster cooperation between the US
and French Supreme Courts. Briard now belongs to
France's Institute for National Defense Studies.
Daniel Huff He's
Director of the Legal Project, an organization
involved in "protect(ing) researchers and analysts who
work on the topics of terrorism, terrorist funding,
and radical Islam from lawsuits designed to silence
their exercise of free speech." He's
a former Senate Judiciary Committee counsel on matters
of national security, civil, and criminal matters, and
once was a management consultant for McKinsey & Co.
Douglas Murray He's
Director of the Center for Social Cohesion, a UK
right-wing think tank, specializing in studying
radicalism and extremism in Britain. He's also a
freelance journalist and author of books including, "Neoconservatism:
Why We Need It."
Pierre Prosper He's
US Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, and was
formerly special counsel and policy advisor in the
Office of War Crimes Issues, a special assistant to
the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal
Division, an Assistant US Attorney for the Central
District of California, and Deputy District Attorney
for Los Angeles County.
Jeremy Rabkin He's
a George Mason University School of Law Professor of
Law and member of the US Institute of Peace,
congressionally funded to promote US interests in
"resolving" international conflicts. He also has a
particular interest in matters of national security
law and early constitutional history.
Joshua Rozenberg His
bio calls him "Britain's best-known commentator on the
law," having been BBC's legal correspondent for 15
years, and since 2000 in the same capacity for The
Daily Telegraph. He also writes for the London Evening
Standard and the Law Society's Gazette.
Mark Shurtleff He's
Utah Attorney General, former Assistant Attorney
General, and once served as Deputy County Attorney and
Commissioner of Salt Lake County.
Notable by Their
Exclusion
Notably absent were academics, scholars, human rights
activists, and other critics of US and Israeli
policies, the rule of law, and accountability for
states that break it. In framing issues, Conference
participants told attendees that international law
doesn't apply when it conflicts with powerful state
interests, the rights of their victims thereby
unaddressed, silenced, and of no interest.
George Mason University's Jeremy Rabkin called "taking
international law too seriously" dangerous, saying
"It's not like the tax code." Audaciously, he claimed
its principles are unclear with no court to enforce
them, when he knows laws are clear and unequivocal and
the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague is
a permanent tribunal established to prosecute
individuals for crimes of war, against humanity, and
genocide.
John Bolton told
attendees: "It
is a big mistake for us to grant any validity to
international law even when it may seem in our
short-term interest to do so - because over the
long-term, those who think that international law
really means anything are those who want to constrict
the United States." In
other words, we're boss. What we say goes, and
dissidents are legitimate enemies, an idea dominant in
Nazi Germany and other past and current despotic
states.
Hitler justified exterminating Jews for destroying the
German nation through culture and democracy. He
started WW II blaming Poland for a Nazi-staged
incident. He declared war on Britain claiming its
prime minister spurned his 1940 peace offer saying: "If
the Providence has so willed that the German people
cannot be spared this fight, then I can only be
grateful that it entrusted me with the leadership in
this historic struggle which, for the next 500 or
1,000 years, will be described as decisive, not only
for....Germany, but for the whole of Europe and indeed
the whole world." When
he invaded Russia, he said "I sought no war. On the
contrary, I did everything to avoid it (but) in view
of the mortal danger from the Soviet Union (to all
Europe)" he gave "the signal to attack myself (for)
this moral struggle." And
when he declared war on America, he blamed it on
Roosevelt and his coterie of Jews and WW I on Wilson,
both men he considered mad. He
accused Roosevelt of inciting war, falsifying the
causes, "then odiously wrap(ping) himself in a cloak
of Christian hypocrisy...." and policies "aimed at
unrestricted world domination and dictatorship
(together) with England (against) the rights of the
German, Italian and Japanese nations...." When
tyrants or extremists try justifying illegal actions,
there's no dearth of excuses, including tried and true
fear mongering and blaming victims.
Propagandizing for Israel The
Jerusalem-based NGO Monitor disseminates propaganda,
debases the legitimate human rights community, and
promotes a pro-Israeli agenda defending the
indefensible, Anne Herzberg its legal advisor. At the
conference, she assailed notable human rights
organizations for promoting a "radical agenda" and
"anti-state, anti-democracy, (and) anti-American"
ideology. For
revealing Israeli crimes of war and against humanity,
Justice Richard Goldstone was particularly assailed,
David Schizer saying he:
"created standards of morality in war that leave a
state without the means of legitimate
self-protection," ignoring Israeli premeditated
aggression and victimized Gazans, a matter clearly and
unequivocally covered under international law
principles.
Schizer and others didn't go there, instead focusing
on ways to discredit US and Israeli critics to
delegitimize them, notably human rights organizations
like B'Tselem, Al-Haq, the Palestinian Centre for
Human Rights (PCHR), and, of course, the UN Human
Rights Council (HRC) Goldstone Commission.
Israel's Lawfare
Forum A
February Jerusalem conference covered the same ground,
defining Lawfare as "waging war under the cover of
war," and urging help for Israel to "delegitimize its
delegitimization." Speakers claimed Israel obeys
international law, conforms to the laws of armed
conflict in fighting "terror," has a legitimate right
to kill enemies of the state, and to discredit critics
like Richard Goldstone whose assertions are more
suitable for discussion at "a psychiatrist's seminar,"
according to reserve IDF Lt. Col. David Benjamin. He
and others called the Goldstone Report corrupt for
accusing Israel of crimes, and to take the offensive
by making Israel the plaintiff, not the accused. DJ
Schneeweiss, former Israeli deputy ambassador to
China, told attendees: "We
are fighting a strategic, multi-dimentional,
ideologically clothed war that uses the language of
values and simple, repetitive messages against us.
Anti-Zionist Israelis and Jews add fuel to the fire."
Participants at both conferences didn't let truth,
justice, and democratic values impede their extremist
ideology, loyalty to criminal states, and the
institutionalized state terrorism they practice.
Instead, they blamed victims for their crimes -
another refuge for scoundrels who have no morality
standards, no principles, no legitimacy, and no place
to hide under the law.
Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre
for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and
can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and
listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished
guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the
Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central
time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs
are archived for easy listening.
http://prognewshour.progressiveradionetwork.org/ |