|
22 April 2010 By Keith Johnson This should be a lesson to all those young,
aggressive, upwardly mobile Wall Street wannabes who
think they are somehow going to fast track their way
into the stratosphere of high finance. Sorry, kids! There’s no room left at the top, and
soon you’re going to see even those old money families
tearing each other apart for what’s left of a
collapsing fiat money system that has just about run
its course. I submit to you the unfortunate tale of Goldman
Sachs’ naïve boy protégé, Fabrice Tourre, the
so-called ‘Fabulous Fab’ who is alleged to be the
mastermind behind a scheme to sell toxic mortgage
investments that were deliberately designed to fail in
the US housing market crash. Fabrice Tourre, 31, is the classic patsy and the
kind of villain the American people love to hate.
He’s foreign (French), flamboyant, young, rich and
shrewd. He was only 22 and fresh out of college when
he started working for Goldman Sachs in 2001. Just
five years into his employment, he found himself at
the center of a scheme devised by one of the world’s
richest billionaires, hedge fund manager John
Paulson. Paulson had presented a roster of sub-prime
mortgage deals that he was betting would fail in the
housing market. He paid Goldman Sachs $15 million to
find clients that would bet the other way. The scheme
was packaged into what has come to be known as an
‘Abacus Deal’. Tourre is alledged to have taken this portfolio to
potential investors and sell them as favorable risks
while hiding the fact that he was working with
Paulson, who was betting against them. To help with pitching these toxic investments, they
employed the services of ACA Capital Holdings, Inc.
and convinced them that Paulson was actually investing
in these mortgages. Tourre and Paulson then used
ACA’s endorsement of the mortgages as a credible and
sound investment. Everything went as planned and
Paulson cashed in on a cool $1 billion while the
Goldman Sachs investors took it in the shorts. Now the SEC has been called in to restore their
tarnished image with the public by bringing suit
against the investment giant and taking aim, in
particular, at the novice Tourre. So far, the SEC has
conducted five interviews including one with the now
notorious ‘Fabulous Fab’. They have not elected to
interview any one of the top Goldman Sachs executives,
including Tourre’s manager Jonathan Egol. They’ve
also apparently found no need to trouble Mr. Paulson
with any of their inquiries. Goes to show you that
only the little minnows get swallowed up in the
cesspool of Wall Street. Tourre is said to have been well liked and popular
at Goldman Sachs. He is known for his impecible charm
and biting sense of humor. Up through and including
2008, he has reportedly been pulling in over $2
million a year. He has since moved to an office on
Fleet street in London and has been “living it up” and
throwing loud, lavish parties out of his luxurious
bachealor flat. Apparently, Tourre has been laying
low and ducking media interviews. But you can bet
that the boys at Sachs have already sent their best
attorneys to drape an arm around his back and rub his
shoulders. You can probably imagine the scene: The
poor kid (boo hoo) is probably cradling his face in
his hands and shaking his head as the Sachs lawyers
whisper in his ear that everything is going to be
O.K. “Just keep quiet” they’re telling him—“We’ll
do all the talking. You’re probably going to have to
take the fall on this one, but we’ll do everything
within our power to make sure you’re well taken care
of when this thing blows over.”
Meanwhile, back in the States, his bosses are laying
the groundwork for pinning all of the blame on this
minor player. The most recent statement by Goldman
Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein should convince you of that. In response to the allegations of misconduct,
Blankfein told his employees Sunday “I will repeat
what you have heard me say many times in the past:
Goldman Sachs has never condoned and would never
condone inappropriate activity by any of our people.
On the contrary, we would be the first to condemn it
and take immediate and appropriate action. Our
responsibility as a financial intermediary requires it
and our commitment to integrity and the firm’s
business principles demand it.” If that doesn’t convince you that Goldman Sachs is
setting this kid up to take the fall, I don’t know
what will. So you see what I mean when I say he’s the
perfect “patsy”. This kid has been served up for
American consumption. Your average “Sarah Palin-Tea
Party” Republican, pissed off about the Wall Street
bail-outs, will unwittingly accept this burnt offering
as Goldman Sachs’ sacrificial lamb and will be just
enough of a token gesture for the fence-sitting
Democrats to come back around to Obama when he brings
the whip down on this poor, hapless dupe. The American people are a predictable bunch. As
long as you frame everything in the context of a
Hollywood script you could have them believing just
about anything. It reminds me of the Neo-con (Jerry
Bruckheimer) produced film Enemy of the State
where rouge elements in the NSA cover up the killing
of a US Congressman. In the end, the integrity of the
NSA is upheld as we see the young agents held to
answer for their crimes by our heroic government.
You’re bound to see that same scenario unfold here.
Goldman Sachs will throw this kid under the bus and
claim that they were duped right along with the rest
of their investors. Goldman Sachs will let this play
out in a long, drawn-out court battle until it is all
but forgotten in the American public’s mind. They’ll
end up paying a fine, that sounds like a lot of money
to most people, but in reality amounts to nothing more
than a slap on the wrist. As for Tourre? Well, he’ll
be flushed down the memory hole of oblivion after a
royal screwing in the press as the rouge villain who
besmerched the good name of Goldman Sachs. But the more enlightened of us will know the real
truth. It was Tourre’s superiors who really
engineered this debacle. Anyone with half a brain
knows that a novice like Tourre would never be left
unattended to make deals with heavy hitters like John
Paulson. Schemes of this magnitude don’t go forward
without first being signed off by the guys upstairs.
On Monday, the New York times cited eight confidential
sources who made this point clear. The article stated
that: “According to interviews with
eight former Goldman employees, senior bank executives
played a pivotal role in overseeing the mortgage unit
just as the housing market began to go south. These
people spoke on the condition that they not be named
so as not to jeopardize business relationships or to
anger executives at Goldman, viewed as the most
powerful bank on Wall Street.
According to these people, executives up to and
including Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chairman and chief
executive, took an active role in overseeing the
mortgage unit. It was Goldman’s top leadership, these
people say, that ended the dispute on the mortgage
desk by siding with those who, like Tourre and Egol,
believed home prices would decline…By early 2007,
Goldman’s mortgage unit had become a hive of intense
activity. In addition to Blankfein, Gary D. Cohn,
Goldman’s president, and David A. Viniar, the chief
financial officer, visited the mortgage unit
frequently.” This whole scandal couldn’t come at a better time
for Goldman Sach’s choice for President, Barrack Obama.
He and the Democratic Party are reeling from public
outcry against his sell out to the health insurance
industry and the never ending bail-outs to their
friends on Wall Street. This fiasco will help push
through a regulatory bill that will actually
concentrate more power to the FED (Goldman Sachs
Alumni) and will only serve to make smaller firms
vulnerable to absorption by the likes of Goldman Sachs
and other giants. Obama will shake his fist, yell at
Republicans who come to Wall Street’s defence, and
come out looking like a maverick who took on those
nasty ‘special interests’ that he loves to claim he’s
a crusader against. This is also an opportunity for the SEC to come out
looking tough after their disgraceful conduct in the
Bernie Madoff affair. Taking on Goldman Sachs will be
a great boost to their image. But that could only
happen under unusual circumstances like these. Right
now, Goldman Sachs actually wants to be made to look
like they’re no different from anybody else. They
need to convince the American people that they are
just as vulnerable and subject to public scrutiny as
any other legitimate business. In other words,
Goldman Sachs has given the SEC permission to take
them on. Otherwise, the SEC would be just as
ineffective and bias as they have always been. The
SEC is actually a public relations device for the
FED. They go after the little guys to look like
they’re doing something while turning a blind eye to
the big investment firms that their agents hope to
someday work for. Never was this more apparent than
during the Madoff scandal. Madoff whistleblower Harry
Markopolos repeatedly warned the Securities and
Exchange Commission that Madoff was perpetrating a
massive investment fraud and said that the regulatory
agency that the SEC is inept, "financially
illiterate" and far too cozy with the financial
titans it is supposed to be regulating. Markopolos
said “The SEC is also captive to the industry it
regulates and it is afraid of bringing big cases
against the largest most powerful firms. Cleary the
SEC was afraid of Mr. Madoff." It was also
reported that agents who were dispatched to interview
Madoff were so enamored with his lavish offices and
lifestyle that they were tripping over themselves
trying to get their resumes onto his desk. Such is
the true reality of the SEC. This is not to say that the bright and rosy future
of Goldman Sachs is etched in solid granite. As the
fractional reserve system of banking starts to
collapse, we are bound to see the connoisseurs of fine
dining resort to cannibalistic practices as they
scramble to loot and plunder what’s left of the
American economy. Bon Appétit. |