Breast
Cancer Update: What To Expect If You've Got It - Granny
Jane
24 May 2010
By Jane
Stillwater
For years now, my face has been disfigured by an old
skin cancer scar. Yuck! Don't you just hate getting
cancer? Most people do. But instead of just sitting
around hatin' on cancer, my local hospital is taking
action against the disease. Not only have they
developed a super-duper traditional cancer-fighting
program of the first order, but they also utilize
almost every other kind of cancer-fighting technique
they can get their hands on. I'm impressed.
At my local hospital's comprehensive cancer center
they also offer acupuncture, massage, Jin Shin Jyutsu,
guided imagery, yoga, chi gong and mindfulness
programs along the lines of Jonathan Kabot-Zinn. They
want the best for their patients and they want their
patients to get well. And surprisingly enough, a
goodly majority of them do get well. The number of
funerals here seems to be way down.
The other day, my hospital also sponsored something
called a "Mock Tumor Board". That's when various
cancer specialists demonstrate how they usually get
together as a board and consult each other on how a
particular patient should best be served by all of his
or her doctors working together to help the patient
get well.
This is my report on a "mock" breast cancer tumor
board. This is how a breast cancer tumor is treated
these days -- from beginning to end. And since
something like one in eight women in the United States
will be diagnosed with breast cancer sooner or later,
this is stuff you should know.
At this particular demonstration, the board only
discussed traditional Western medical approaches to
cancer. If you want info about the use of yoga, chi
gong guided imagery, etc., that will be another report
altogether. This is only a report on the
mammogram/radiology/chemotherapy type of stuff.
There were no refreshments served at this board.
"Today we have a medical oncologist, a breast surgeon,
a radiologist, a pathologist and a radiation
oncologist," announced the moderator. "They would like
to give a demonstration of what an actual breast
cancer tumor board is like -- when, once a week, these
experts come together to decide on a treatment plan
for each new breast cancer patient case we have here."
The case under discussion today was a 64-year-old
woman with a history of hypertension, kidney stones
and use of hormone replacement therapy. "She has three
children, works as an administrative assistant, used
to smoke but quit, weighs 220 pounds and had a 4 x4
centimeter mass in her right breast."
The radiologist spoke first. "Our facility uses
digital mammograms now, which are as good or better
than screen mammograms. However, sometimes we don't
see lesions on a mammogram even if there are lumps, so
if this is the case we then do a sonogram to make
sure." He then showed us a PowerPoint presentation of
various sonogram photos of an actual cancerous breast
tumor.
"We look for a mass that has architectural
distortion," and some other things which I missed
because I was too busy taking notes. "We look for
irregular margins." Yep. The mass looked more like an
amoeba than like a cyst.
"Notice that the mass is shaped irregularly -- whereas
a cyst has a more regular shape." The next step, after
a suspicious mass has been isolated, is to have the
mass biopsied. "It used to be that surgical biopsies
were the only accurate forms for obtaining accurate
specimens but needle biopsies are very accurate now.
Surgical biopsies are no longer necessary." Whew.
I had a surgical biopsy back in 1976 and it was large
and hurtful and scar-producing and nasty. Fortunately,
however, my biopsy turned out to be negative.
If the biopsy proves to be positive, then they do an
MRI next -- to see how large the tumor actually is. "MRIs
can define tumors even more clearly." Then the surgeon
will know what to expect when he or she operates.
The patient (hopefully not you or me) is next seen by
a surgeon. "From this MRI photo, you can see that
there is a solitary lesion here. Then several
questions immediately arise. Where is it located? Can
it be removed cosmetically? Can it be gotten out with
a clear margin around the lesion? Will it lend itself
to a lumpectomy instead of a complete breast removal?"
Also doctors now can do a sentinel lymph node surgery
so they don't have to remove all underarm lymph nodes.
The surgeon also works with a plastic surgeon to get
good cosmetic results as well as stopping the cancer.
"After the surgery, the pathologist receives the tumor
for analysis. Are we sure that the tumor has been
taken out completely? Are the margins clean? The
pathologist makes slides from a cross-section of the
tumor."
Then the pathologist showed us a photo of a tumor.
Yuck! You don't even want to know. Chicken intestines
come to mind.
The specimen is then processed to look for stuff. What
kind of stuff? "The presence of overstimulated
estrogen and progesterone, cancer cells, etc."
We are then shown a slide of a normal breast's cells,
milk-producing glands, fatty areas and ducts. "Note
that the cells and the architecture are regular and
round and well-differentiated."
Then we saw photos of cancerous breast cells. "Here's
a slide from our patient. I'm going to show you now
what an invasive carcinoma looks like." The cell
structure has broken down -- bigtime! "They are very
disorganized." Fascinating. It's like the breakdown of
civilization.
"The patient had a lumpectomy but it was a complex
situation."
There are three factors that a pathologist looks for
in a tumor: "Its architecture, the nuclei and..."
something else. That cancer surely has taken over and
fouled things up. You don't have to go to med school
to see the difference between normal and cancerous
cells in these photos. The pathologist's presentation
made it clear that cancer is pretty violent stuff.
"Sometimes tumors become more aggressive as time
passes." Yeah duh.
After the pathologist, the patient is taken to the
medical oncologist, who looks at various pathological
aspects of the tumor. "If a person has a lot of
estrogen and progesterone receptors, a patient tends
to do much better." They also look at the age of a
patient and the presence of other health risk factors
-- co-morbidities.
This is the point when the doctors decide whether or
not to give chemotherapy. "This patient may not need
chemotherapy but will definitely need hormone therapy.
With only a lumpectomy and radiation, she would have
an 18% chance of relapse." And that's not good enough.
The doc also looks at the patient's various genes via
Mamoprint and Oncotype DX tests to see what her
genetic disposition toward cancer is. "A low-risk
patient has less than 10% risk."
"What is hormone therapy?" someone asked.
"It blocks estrogen production." Did I hear that
right? Estrogen production is a bad thing? Or only a
certain type of estrogen production? Remind me to
Google that later. "Hormone therapies block the
production of estrogen..."
"In this case, the patient's oncologist decided not to
use chemotherapy which is toxic, but it is more art
than science to make this call at this point." And
apparently they keep an eye on breast cancer patients
for the next 30 years -- just to make sure that the
various specialists did make the right call.
Next came the radiation oncologist. "This patient
opted to conserve her breast. If there is a clean
margin -- of at least one millimeter -- around the
tumor, then radiation is an option over a mastectomy."
Radiation therapy takes place five days a week for
about seven weeks. Studies are showing that a
radiation course may be shortened, but there is only
about five to ten years of follow-up available on the
long-term results of decreased radiation."
When getting radiation treatments, a patient, by
holding her breath, can apparently push her lungs and
heart out of the way of the radiation and thus lower
its effects on those organs. But even so, radiation is
still a rather fierce treatment. "Radiation can cause
scarring and changes to ligaments and skin."
Next, the surgeon spoke again about the benefits of
holding tumor boards. "When we all meet to consult, we
discuss each case carefully. And sometimes we don't
always agree on treatment. But we do combine our
knowledge to the patient's best advantage."
"What is the success rate of surviving breast cancer
these days?" I asked.
"There is a declining morbidity rate now, based on
early diagnosis, hormone markers, targeted therapy,
etc. Most women these days do NOT die of breast
cancer."
Yaay!
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments