|
18 May 2010
By Jonathan Cook
The recent arrest of two
respected public figures from Israel’s Palestinian
Arab minority in night-time raids on their homes by
the Shin Bet secret police -- brought to light this
week when a gag order was partially lifted -- has sent
shock waves through the community.
The arrests are not the
first of their kind. The Shin Bet has been hounding
and imprisoning politicians and intellectuals from the
country’s Palestinian minority, a fifth of the
population, since the birth of the Jewish state more
than six decades ago. Currently, two MPs from Arab
political parties, as well as the leader of the
popular Islamic Movement, are facing trials.
But the detention of Amir
Makhoul and Omar Sayid is seen differently -- as the
gathering storm clouds in a political climate already
fiercely hostile to its Palestinian citizens.
Mohammed Zeidan, the head
of the Human Rights Association in Nazareth, said: “We
are used to our political leaders being persecuted but
now the Shin Bet is turning its sights on the leaders
of Palestinian civil society in Israel, and that’s a
dangerous development.”
Mr Makhoul and Mr Sayid are
not accused of the usual public order offences, nor
have they simply violated chauvinistic legislation
that criminalises Palestinian citizens’ visits to
neighbouring Arab states. Both are facing the much
more serious charge of espionage, on behalf of
Lebanon’s Hizbollah.
Mr Makhoul, who appears to
be the chief object of the Shin Bet’s interest, is the
head of Ittijah, an umbrella organisation co-ordinating
the activities of Palestinian human rights groups in
Israel. More specifically, he has become the leading
voice inside Israel backing the growing international
campaign for boycott, sanctions and divestment against
Israel.
On Wednesday, the courts
approved an extension of Mr Makhoul’s remand. He was
not allowed to be present and was denied the right to
a lawyer until at least next Monday, 12 days since his
arrest. He is reportedly being interrogated around the
clock.
Mr Sayid, an activist with
the Tajamu political party and a scientist who
specialises in developing new medicines from Middle
Eastern plants, has been held by the Shin Bet since
April 24.
Amnesty International has
threatened to declare Mr Makhoul a “prisoner of
conscience”, saying his arrest “smacks of pure
harassment, designed to hinder his human rights
work”.
Observers from the
Palestinian minority too have ridiculed the
allegations, based on secret evidence, that the pair
made “contact with a foreign agent”. They point out
that under the draconian emergency regulations being
used in this case the Shin Bet needs only the
flimsiest circumstantial evidence to lay such a
charge.
Mr Zeidan called it an
easy, “one size fits all” security offence that was
difficult to challenge but persuasive to the Jewish
majority. “You only need unwittingly to meet at a
conference a relative of a relative of someone in
Hizbollah and the Shin Bet thinks it has grounds to
arrest you.”
The Palestinian minority is
not alone in believing that Mr Makhoul and Mr Sayid
have not spied in the accepted sense of passing
classified or sensitive information to an enemy:
Israel’s military correspondents have been largely
dismissive of the espionage charges too. In Haaretz,
Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff pointed out that
neither Palestinian citizen is privy to secrets that
would interest Hizbollah.
Instead, the correspondents
hinted at other motives behind the arrests. Any
contacts between Israel’s enemies such as Hizbollah
and Palestinian rights activists in Israel are a
threat, they surmise, because Palestinian leaders in
Israel might offer assistance in “co-ordinating
political positions” or initiate “protests and riots
during sensitive periods”. That radically expands the
traditional definition of “espionage”.
The Shin Bet’s pursuit of
Mr Makhoul and Mr Sayid, in the view of community
leaders, needs to be understood in terms of a fixed
assumption by the Israeli establishment that the Arab
minority poses a political threat to the continued
survival of a Jewish state.
The roots of this worldview
can be traced back to the signing of the Oslo accords.
With the launch of a peace process with the
Palestinians, Israeli politicians began to reconsider
the status of the large Palestinian minority. Many
believed that allowing a significant population of
Palestinians to remain inside Israel as citizens after
the creation of a neighbouring Palestinian state might
one day prove to be the country’s Achilles’ heel.
Might not the Palestinian
minority provide the Palestinians in the occupied
territories with a “foot in the door” to try to win
back the whole of historic Palestine rather than
settle for a mini-state in the West Bank and Gaza?
Those fears escalated
dramatically when Oslo turned sour and the second
intifada erupted in 2000. Israel believed the
Palestinians had refused its “generous” offer at Camp
David in the hope that they could use the Palestinian
minority as a “Trojan horse” to destroy the Jewish
state demographically from within.
Ehud Barak, the prime
minister at the time, called the Palestinian minority
the “spear point” of what he believed was Yasser
Arafat’s attempt to dismantle Israel as a Jewish
state. He feared that a political reform programme
demanding a “state of all its citizens”, which had
become a rallying cry for Palestinian citizens, was
really intended to bring the return of millions of
Palestinian refugees under cover of an equal rights
struggle.
Israel responded by making
contact all but impossible between Palestinians in
Israel and those in the occupied territories,
including by building a wall around the West Bank and
legislating an effective ban on marriages across the
Green Line.
Perhaps not surprisingly,
the Shin Bet’s chief target prior to the latest
arrests was Azmi Bishara, the architect of the “state
of all its citizens” campaign. In 2007 Bishara was
accused of spying for Hizbullah too, and has been in
exile ever since.
At that time, Yuval Diskin,
the head of the Shin Bet, warned that he regarded it
as his job to “thwart” any activities, including
political ones, that threatened Israel’s survival as a
Jewish state.
According to Mr Zeidan and
other analysts, the Shin Bet’s hand in the latest
arrests appears to be guided by a similar assessment
that the Palestinian minority is again posing an
“existential threat” to Israel – even if for different
reasons.
Mr Makhoul is seen as at
the figurehead of an emerging movement inside Israel
that, faced with the refusal of Israelis to
countenance political reforms to democratise the
country, is devising new political strategies.
He has not hidden the
extensive contacts he has developed both among western
Palestinian solidarity activists and in the Arab
world, urging the need for a boycott of Israel. He was
also at the forefront of the protests inside Israel
against its attack on Gaza last year. He was called in
for interrogation by the Shin Bet at the time.
“The occupation isn’t news
anymore,” Mr Zeidan said. “The big threats facing
Israel, in the Shin Bet’s view, are its deteriorating
image in terms of human rights and the growing sense
abroad that it is an apartheid state.
“Palestinian civil society
in Israel, more so even than our political parties, is
best placed to make the case on those issues to the
international community, to expose the racism and
discrimination inherent in a Jewish state. Amir
Makhoul’s arrest should be understood in that light.
“The Shin Bet believes we
have crossed a red line in our international
advocacy.”
Jonathan Cook is a writer
and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His latest
books are “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations:
Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East”
(Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel's
Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website
is
www.jkcook.net |