|
19 May 2010 By Ramzy
Baroud When the Soviets
concluded their pull out from Afghanistan in February
1989, the United States government abruptly lost
interest in the country. A devastated economic
infrastructure, entrenched poverty, deep-rooted
factionalism and lack of international aid caused the
country to descend into complete chaos. Internal
violence also worsened, but it was no longer an
American concern. All that mattered was that the Cold
War rival had been defeated. Mission accomplished.
Afghanistan remains
the starkest illustration of how poor countries are
used, then betrayed when their usefulness runs out.
But Afghanistan is not an exception; US relations with
many other countries, including Pakistan, Somalia and
the Palestinian Authority remain hostage to this very
model. Yemen is now emerging
as the newest casualty. Its government is desperate to
hold on to the rein of power, amid corruption, extreme
poverty and untold Western pressures. Ali Abdullah
Saleh, the country’s president of the last thirty one
years, has impressively negotiated his political
survival through mounting challenges. The 1994 civil
war left many thousands dead, and despite the north’s
‘victory’ the discontent of the south never waned.
More, a Houthi revolt in the north is long running.
Its latest manifestation lasted for sixth months and
caused many deaths, most of which remained unreported.
A mass migration of hundreds of thousands (270,000 by
the recent estimates of the United Nations World Food
Program) coincided with or followed the fighting. This
is now temporarily in check, thanks to a fragile
ceasefire. According to some
analysts, the ceasefire in the north could allow the
central government in Sanaa to tend to the challenge
growing in the south. Victoria Clark, author of the
recent book Yemen: Dancing on the Heads of Snakes
claimed that, "Southern disaffection has gone beyond
the point of no return…Saleh's biggest mistake would
be to crack down on southerners as hard as he has
tried to do on the Houthi rebels." However, under immense
(and increasing) western pressure, Saleh is likely to
crack down. Western governments, led by the US and
Britain, run out of patience fairly quickly when the
leaders of a poor, fragmented country opt for dialogue
- even when such a choice might actually result in
long-term political stability. When Afghan President
Hamid Karzai merely mentioned of the possibility of
engaging the Taliban, it generated much rebuke. A
similar scenario happened in Pakistan. When
Palestinian factions achieved the Mecca Agreement in
February 2007 to mend their differences, the US
immediately conditioned its financial backing of
Mahmoud Abbas, and the agreement was successfully
disintegrated. In the same vein, any Yemeni attempt at
reaching out to the disaffected forces within the
country, including tribes, opposition parties, and the
various militant offshoots has been dismissed as an
attempt to appease the terrorists. Following a plot to
blow up a US airliner over the city of Detroit on
Christmas Day, the US renewed its interest in Yemen –
in a predictable way. The administration of President
Barack Obama issued an order early April authorizing
the assassination of a US citizen Anwar al-Awlaki, a
Muslim cleric linked to the plot. It seems like the
Bush years all over again. US Special Operation
Forces have been at work in Yemen for years, following
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Yemen was
then declared “an important partner in the global war
on terrorism,” and it remains so, whenever there is a
need to chase the elusive militant groups partly or
wholly linked to al-Qaeda. The violent perusal of
US enemies in Yemen comes at a heavy cost. On one hand
it has undermined the central government, which is
being increasingly challenged from the north, the
south and the center. Naturally, no self-respecting
government would allow its territories to be used
either as breeding grounds for militants, or as a
hunting ground for foreign forces. A raid involving US
cruise missiles at an alleged al-Qaeda camps in
December 17, 2009 killed dozens, including 23 women
and 17 children, according to Yemeni sources. Indeed, Yemen is to a
great extent a battlefield in which the central
government is hardly the central player. However, the
so-called ‘war on terror’ has presented many
self-seeking forces in Yemen with a golden opportunity
to extract wealth. Much has been ‘invested’ to beat
al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsular (AQAP). But little
has been spent elsewhere, for example, in providing
sustenance to the hundreds of thousands victimized by
the ongoing violence. When problems become
insurmountable and there is no effective system of
accountability in place, corruption becomes rampant.
It is no wonder that Yemen ranks 154 of the 180
countries examined in the Transparency International
Corruption Index. Corruption is often an outcome of
poverty and lack of accountability, and it also
contributes to them. Yemen is unable to escape this
vicious circle. Since Yemen is not
officially an occupied country, donor countries can
easily disown their financial promises. Such promises
are only made when Yemen is set for some military
operation or another, or to prop up the central
government’s own proxy war on terror. However, when
the Yemeni people are in genuine and dire need for
help, Yemen becomes such a distant subject. It begets
pity, at best, but no action. According to the World
Food Program (WFP), 7.2 million people – about a third
of the country’s population - are suffering from
chronic hunger. Almost half of them require immediate
food assistance, but fewer than half a million are
receiving it. They have been directly affected by the
policies of western governments, and the central
government’s own involvement in proxy wars on
militants, tribes and other disaffected Yemenis.
How much money is the
WFP is asking for in its latest appeal? A meager $103
million, out of which only $27 million has been
received. A Tomahawk cruise missile – celebrated as
both cheap but effective – costs around $600,000. The
cost of the operation that killed dozens of innocent
Yemenis last December could have, in fact, fed
millions in need. This is not a matter
of mathematics; it is common sense. The ongoing
miscalculations in Yemen are securing the very
environment that lead to poverty, corruption, anger -
and ultimately militancy and violence. According to Emilia
Casella, spokeswoman for the WFP, “people have three
other options after that -- revolt, migrate or die.".
Sadly, it is what millions of Yemenis are already
doing. - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net)
is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the
editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is
"My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza's Untold Story"
(Pluto Press, London), now available on Amazon.com |