|
16 July 2010 By Keith Johnson Slowly I turned…step by step…inch by inch… Does anyone remember the famous black-and-white
skit, performed by the Three Stooges, where a
psychotic Moe goes berserk and attacks an innocent
bystander who unwittingly utters the trigger words
“Niagara Falls!”? Today, we have a new cast of crazies doing the same
routine. However, you can substitute the word “Iran!”
in place of the words “Niagara Falls!” and still get
the same reaction out of the likes of Joseph Lieberman
(I – CT), John McCain (R – AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R –
SC), AKA: The Three Stooges. For the last few days, this psychotic trio of
serial killers were in their beloved homeland of
Israel, licking the hand that feeds them and
performing renditions of John McCain’s favorite tune:
“Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran” to an
audience of likeminded Israeli warlords. Actually, what was said behind closed doors can
only be speculated. But, considering the track record
of these three filthy war criminals, you can be almost
certain that the blood sacrifice of your children and
the slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent
Persians were among the highlights discussed by these
well-fed senior citizens as they stuffed their sagging
jowls with caviar and sipped champagne from their
thin, purple lips. When they emerged, they met the press. Their
comments were purposely measured in tone and
contradictory in nature. While they denied that
neither Israel nor the U.S. were planning to strike
Iran anytime soon, they strongly suggested that they
were prepared to take any action necessary to halt
continued progress on its nuclear ambitions. Their
tempered and seemingly innocuous statements were the
most telling sign—to date—that an attack on the
Islamic state is imminent.
Speaking from Jerusalem on Wednesday, John McCain
addressed a gaggle of reporters after meeting with
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Israel's
military chief of staff, Gabi Ashkenazi. When asked
if he would support an Israeli military strike on
Iran, McCain said, “I don't believe we are at the
point of making that kind of decision, nor is the
Israeli government, given the state that Iran is in
now as far as the development of their nuclear weapons
is concerned." McCain said it was impossible for
him to say whether he would back such an operation
because it "would be dictated by so many different
circumstances." Those “many different circumstances” that
McCain refers to are the multitude of options that the
Israeli government and their NeoCon puppets are
weighing as an excuse to launch a U.S. led strike on
Iran. McCain has been frustrated by sanctions,
because as far as he’s concerned—sanctions are for
pussies! Nothing less than a mushroom cloud
rising out of the ashes of a big steaming pile of
Bar-B-Qued 4-year-olds will make John McCain happy.
For months he has been rallying support among his
constituency of misguided Christian Zionists and
armchair war hawks, insisting that nothing short of
tough military action should be taken to prevent Iran
from destroying the world with their cache of
low-grade medical isotopes. Why now would he tone
down his rhetoric unless he was confident that his
dream of mass destruction was soon to become a
reality? Joe Lieberman, on the other hand, couldn’t help but
reiterate his long held position of aggression. He
told reporters that there is a broad consensus in
Congress that military force can be used, if
necessary, to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear
weapons. Lieberman cited the recent sanctions passed
by Congress as a potential deterrent. But he went on
to say that keeping Iran from becoming a nuclear power
would be accomplished, “through diplomatic and
economic sanctions if we possibly can, through
military actions if we must." Little Lindsey Graham summed up the trio’s true
“consensus” best when he declared, “Congress has
Israel’s back!” It was his little way of letting
Israel know that their AIPAC money was being well
spent on him, and that there was no need to out him as
a homosexual. What a confederacy of dunces! These are the guys
the American people have entrusted to dictate our
foreign policy? They insist that Iran is developing
nuclear weapons when their own intelligence sources
provide evidence to the contrary. I wrote in a previous article that as recently as
February 11, 2010, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs
responded to a claim by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
that Iran had produced the first stock of 20 percent
enriched uranium. Gibbs said, “The Iranian
nuclear program has undergone a series of problems
throughout the year. We do not believe they have the
capability to enrich to the degree to which they now
say they are enriching.” The enriched uranium
that Ahmadinejad was referring to was not for building
a nuclear weapon but rather for medical isotopes used
to treat cancer patients. And even if they did have
the capability of enriching to 20 percent, it still
falls far short of the nearly 98% that is required for
building a weapon of mass destruction. As a signer of
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has a legal
right to enrich uranium in the manner that they are
claiming. These are the facts. So why would anyone believe
these morons? Need I remind you of the last time we
went to war over the assumption that another Middle
Eastern country was in possession of weapons of mass
destruction? The idiots who are making false claims
about Iran’s weapons program were the same ones making
those claims back then. Both Lieberman and McCain
were signators on a letter (dated December 5, 2001) to
President George W. Bush, urging him to go after
Saddam Hussein for his mythical weapons
program. "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has
reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate
that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status.
In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery
systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit
missile program to develop longer-range missiles that
will threaten the United States and our allies." Of course history has now shown that Lieberman,
McCain and other likeminded fools were dead wrong.
What’s worse is that they most likely knew they were
wrong. But that didn’t stop them from leading us into
a war that resulted in the murder of over a million
Iraqis and the deaths of over four thousand
(conservatively) of our American servicemen. Now we stand on the precipice of yet another
disaster that will make the Iraq War look like a Pop
Warner scrimmage. Are we going to let them do it? Do
we have any choice? All the chess pieces have been laid out on the
table. Every attempt to bring Iran into western
influence has thus far failed. In 2009, the Brzenzski
/Soros team failed to effect regime change by way of a
“color revolution” during the Iranian presidential
elections. Now we have sanctions. But these have yet to apply
adequate pressure on the Iranian government or
encourage dissenters, within the Regime, to stage a
coupe. It is unlikely that sanctions will ever
dissuade Iran from relinquishing its sovereignty. As a matter of fact, while threats from the west
loom, prospects for Iran have never been brighter.
Iran’s ambassador, Mahamoud-Reza Sajjadi, told the
Islamic Republic News Agency “Many countries and
even American firms don't like Iran to be under
sanctions. That's why they are operating in Iran with
different names or through proxy companies from other
countries.” In a relaxed manner, Sajjadi added
that, "The question of sanctions is commonplace to
our people as Iran has been under sanctions for the
past 31 years.” Don’t underestimate Russia. Russia’s signatory to
a joint UN resolution on Iranian sanctions is a clever
ploy to delay an attack on Iran. Their strategy is to
eliminate justification for western strikes on the
Islamic regime while sanctions are in place. During a recent interview with the Wall Street
Journal, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev boldly
voiced strong criticism of the additional U.S. and EU
sanctions on Iran that go beyond those approved by the
UN Security Council. On Thursday, the EU adopted new
sanctions against Iran, focusing on oil and gas,
following U.S. measures on Wednesday that targeted
banking, shipping and the Revolutionary Guard Corps.
"We didn't agree to this when we discussed the joint
resolution at the U.N.," said Medvedev. As stated previously, Iran continues to survive
with covert Russian aid and western trade alliances
working by proxy. Muslim nations, even those with
fundamental religious differences, are now finding
themselves obliged to aid Iran in light of the
worldwide condemnation of Israel over the botched raid
on the Gazan peace flotilla. Nowhere was this reversal so self-evident than
when, On June 11, the London Times initially quotes a
U.S. security official as saying that, "The Saudis
have given their permission for the Israelis to pass
over and they will look the other way. They have
already done tests to make sure their own jets aren't
scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been
done with the agreement of the [US] State
Department." It further quoted sources in the
Saudi government as saying that officials in the
country “all know” about the plan, and that
they “will let them [the Israelis] through and see
nothing.” One day later, Arutz Sheva, an Israeli news
service, completely discredited this assertion by
proclaiming that, “Saudi Arabia on Saturday denied
a report in the London Times that it had given Israel
“clear skies” to attack Iran. According to the report,
Saudi Arabia was testing its radar and defense
equipment in order to partially disable defenses, in
order to allow Israeli planes to fly over Saudi
airspace in the event of an attack against Iranian
nuclear facilities. Riyadh [capital of Saudi
Arabia] denied the report later Saturday, saying
it was “slanderous. Saudi Arabia rejects violating its
sovereignty or the use of its airspace or territories
by anyone to attack any country,” an official said in
a statement.” So where does that leave us? Any good gambler
would look at his cards and fold. Not so with the
U.S. and Israel. These two never leave the table
because they believe they have an endless supply of
money to cover even the most foolish bet. The U.S. is
in it to win it, and you won’t find a sympathetic or
reasonable shoulder to cry on from either end of the
political spectrum; they are both afflicted with the
same mental illness. The Democrats and Republicans both agree that Iran
must fall to western rule. The Brzenzski/Soros
led left wanted to affect that through peaceful regime
change while the Israeli led NeoCons would like to
just blow the Hell out of the place. The left had their chance and they blew it. The
“color revolution” fell flat and it looks like
sanctions won’t work either. So now it’s up to the
insane NeoCons to do things their way. That’s why
McCain is so calm, cool and collected these days.
There’s no longer any need for strong words. The
ships are in the gulf, the rockets are ready to launch
out of Diego Garcia…all that’s missing is the
slightest provocation from Iran and it’s GO TIME! I guess all we can hope for is that Iran avoids a
confrontation by refraining from doing anything
provocative. That’s easier said than done. Imagine having a psychotic policeman, who’s got a
grudge against you, parking his patrol car outside
your front door 24/7. He's looking for any excuse to
bust you! The minute you hit the street—he’s on your
tail. The minute you get out of the car—he’s on your
heel. The minute you come around a corner—he’s lying
on the floor—but you don’t see him. Your
right toe goes into his thigh as you trip over his
body and land flat on your face. The next thing you
know you’ve got your hands behind your back and you’re
on your way to the county jail for assaulting a police
officer. I know it may sound like something out of a
slapstick comedy—and it is! But as far as you and I
and the rest of the world is concerned? It’s no
laughing matter. - Kourosh Ziabari is an Iranian freelance journalist and media
correspondent. He has interviewed political commentator and linguist Noam
Chomsky, member of New Zealand parliament Keith Locke, Australian politician Ian
Cohen, member of German Parliament Ruprecht Polenz, former Mexican President
Vicente Fox, former U.S. National Security Council advisor Peter D. Feaver,
Nobel Prize laureate in Physics Wolfgang Ketterle, Nobel Prize laureate in
Chemistry Kurt Wüthrich, Nobel Prize laureate in biology Robin Warren, famous
German political prisoner Ernst Zündel, Brazilian cartoonist Carlos Latuff,
American author Stephen Kinzer, syndicated journalist Eric Margolis, former
assistant of the U.S. Department of the Treasury Paul Craig Roberts,
American-Palestinian journalist Ramzy Baroud and the former President of the
American Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Sid Ganis. |