|
17 July 2010 By Tariq Alhomayed As soon as US President Obama addressed the
Israelis in a televised interview with one of the
local [Israeli] television stations, the shock hit our
region. This is what became clear from the majority of
the Arab media coverage, especially after Obama told
the Israelis that he understands that his middle name
"Hussein" creates suspicion amongst them. Obama was
right when he said – in the same interview – that the
logic in our region is that "the friend of my enemy
must be my enemy." The Israelis were angered and
suspicious when Obama began his term in office by
sending a message of goodwill to the Muslims, while
today the Arabs are shocked that Obama is addressing
the Israelis in the same language of friendship that
he addressed them with. However the question here must
be; is Obama the president of the Arabs or of Israel,
or is he rather the president of his own country,
working to serve his own country's interests? Obama began his term in office by visiting Egypt
and addressing the Muslim community from Cairo, he
also visited Turkey and spent a night in Saudi Arabia,
while he has yet to make an official state visit to
Israel, and this is the first time that he has
addressed the Israelis as President. He also began his
term in office being attentive towards the Palestinian
issue, in contrast to Clinton and Bush Jr. who only
took an interest in this issue at the end of their
presidencies. Obama also pledged an early withdrawal
from Iraq, and he extended his hands to Tehran, and he
relaxed tensions with the Syrians; managing to do all
of this before he has spent even two years in the
White House. What have the Arabs done to serve their
own causes? That is the question! We are not talking about goodwill gestures towards
Israel here, which is something that Washington
requested, for there is no goodwill with Netanyahu.
However what have we done to strengthen our position,
and ensure that our issues are solvable? We must be
honest here; what have the Arabs achieved in the
inter-Palestinian reconciliation to strengthen the
Palestinian position in confronting the Israelis and
this is prior to any talk about negotiations? Nothing!
Rather we have [Mahmoud] al-Zahar saying that the
"reconciliation is dormant" and we know that
historically speaking "the unrest is dormant; may God
damn anybody who awakens it!" Is this what al-Zahar
meant? It seems so, and this is not surprising for
this represents the Hamas rhetoric. As for Iraq, the Iraqis are experiencing an eternal
night in their attempts to form a government, and so
the US withdrawal from Iraq is less complex than
forming the Baghdad government; this is due to the
involvement of the Iranian wolf in this issue, which
is free to wander as it pleases! As for Iran, it
rejected Obama's outstretched hand, while the Arabs do
not have a clear or public position with regards to
what Iran is doing. This public position could at the
very least explain the dangers represented by the
Iranian presence in Iraq, Lebanon, Gaza, and the Arab
Gulf, which is something that has transformed some of
our writers and intellectuals into an Iranian
propaganda machine. Criticizing Tehran in our region
today has become akin to criticizing Israel in
America, and the hard evidence of this is the
controversy surrounding what the UAE Ambassador to
Washington said [about potentially supporting military
action against Iran to prevent Tehran acquiring
nuclear weapons]. However he is correct and it is
enough to simply look at what is being said in Tehran
about us, our rulers, and our people! It is true that the Americans have a unique role in
all international files due to America's role as a
superpower, and that our region is important, however
we fear that Obama will reach the conviction that was
reached by former US Secretary of State Colin Powell
following his retirement when he famously said "90
percent of my time is spent on 10 percent of the
world." We are no more than 10 percent of the world,
if that, therefore it is not important what Obama – or
Hussein – does for us, what is more important is what
we do for ourselves. Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq
Al-Awsat, the youngest person to be appointed that
position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also
completed his Introductory courses towards a Master’s
degree from George Washington University in Washington
D.C. He is based in London. |