|
10 September 2010 By Ramzy Baroud Writers often romanticize their subjects. At times
they even manipulate their readers. A book - or any
piece of writing for that matter – is meant to provide
a sense of completion. Sociological explanations are
offered to offset the confusion caused by apparent
inconsistency in human behavior. At times a reader is
asked to take a stance, or choose sides. This is especially true in writings which deal with
compelling human experiences. In Behind the Wall:
Life, Love and Struggle in Palestine (Potomac Books,
2010), Rich Wiles undoubtedly directs his readers,
although implicitly, towards taking a stance. But he
is unabashed about his moral priorities and makes no
attempt to disguise his objectives. As I began reading Wiles’ book, various aspects
struck me as utterly refreshing in contrast to the way
Palestine is generally written about. We tend to
complicate what was meant to be straightforward and
become too selective as we construct our narrative.
And we tend to consider the possible political
implications of our writings, and thus compose the
conclusions with only this political awareness in
mind. Much of this is understandable. The situation in
Palestine is appalling, and also worsening. If our
writing is not meant to influence positive change,
then why bother? But a hyped awareness of the
consequences and over-politicization of narratives and
texts can prove limiting and intellectually confining.
Worse, at times it provides a particular
contextualization of the conflict – with all of its
internal offshoots and external outcomes – that does
much injustice to other important contexts. It
neglects facts and paints an unrealistic picture of a
subject already confused in the minds of many readers.
Thus when the conflict is deciphered by a writer,
all players take positions. Israel is pitted against
‘the Arabs’. Palestinians are often sliced off into
two competing parties, while Israel is largely shown
as maintaining a sense of political and institutional
integrity. Palestinians are radicals or moderates,
Islamists or secularists. The ‘conflict’ is right in
the center, and within it are the sub-topics: the
peace process, the occupation, the settlements and
numerous others. Without such lucid configuration
there is no structure. Publishers get frustrated. The
writer is urged to revisit and restructure his work.
But real life is not a well-organized academic
argument. It can be, and often is chaotic, strange and
puzzling, but it is real. Only by understanding
reality the way it is - not the way we feel that it
ought to be for any reason - can we meaningfully
position ourselves to appreciate the subject at hand.
Can we understand the conflict in Palestine and
Israel without subscribing to the same language,
confronting the same political and historical
milestones? Can Palestinians be understood outside the
confines of political and ideological affiliations?
That is what Rich Wiles attempted to do in Behind
the Wall, and in my opinion, very much succeeded. Wiles relocated the conflict historically,
geographically and sociologically to the side most
affected by it: the Palestinians. The book is located
in the West Bank, mostly Aida refugee camp, where
Wiles spent years dedicating his time and efforts as
an artist and a writer to help children share their
stories and talents with the rest of the world. The
writing is a non-elitist, part and parcel, which is a
prerequisite to a factual understanding of the
struggle in Palestine. Equally important, Wiles
provides a depiction of the Palestinian not as the
victim, despite the protracted process of
victimization that Palestinians have endured for
generations. Wiles’ subjects might have been
imprisoned or deeply scarred by war, but they are
confident and complex human beings. A chapter entitled “A Child and a Balcony” starts
with this line: “‘On Friday, December 8, 2006, I was
shot.’ Miras is unemotional as he tells his story.”
Miras should be emotional, but he is not, and Wiles
doesn’t attempt to rectify the seemingly inconsistent
behavior. It turns out that Miras, a child (now a
promising young photographer, thanks to Wiles’ help)
almost died when a bullet carved its way through his
body and penetrated his abdominal from one end and
emerged from the other. He was playing with his
siblings and cousins at a balcony in the refugee camp,
when an Israeli sniper hit him from the watchtower.
The story is short, but rich in emotionally powerful
detail: the father’s panic and near hallucination, the
mother confusion, the sense of solidarity that unifies
the refugees and strengthens their resolve even when
their situation seems so helpless. Wiles is not an anthropologist or a detached
ethnographer, and he doesn’t pose as one. He is part
of the story, at times an important character. In
“Memories”, he accompanies a young Palestinian boy on
the journey of his life, from the confines of the
small refugee camp to Jerusalem. The boy is visiting
his very ill grandfather at a hospital in the Arab
side of the city. (No other member of the family was
granted an Israeli permission to make the short
journey, thus the need for Wiles’ intervention). Wiles
provides an extremely honest and vivid account,
bringing to life the bravery of the boy and the sense
of freedom he experiences as he crosses the
checkpoints into Jerusalem. At the same time, Wiles does not attempt to
assemble the perfect, heroic and infallible character
of the Palestinian. He includes the story of a son of
drug user who was mysteriously killed (perhaps by a
Palestinian group that suspected him as a collaborator
with Israel). The son became involved in the
resistance to redeem the family’s honor. His impulsive
resistance (an attempt to burn a hole in the Israeli
wall that surrounded his refugee camp) earned him time
in an Israeli prison. Yasser Jedar (known as Yasser
‘Wall’ owing to his obsession with trying to bring
down the Israeli wall) was certainly not a poster
child revolutionary. But he is refreshingly real,
which is what should matter the most to an inquisitive
reader. Wiles’ work is an important contribution to what I
insist on referring to as a ‘People’s History of
Palestine’. In order for this genre to endure and
flourish, it must remain honest, and duty-bound to the
truth - to reality as it is, not how we wish it to be.
- Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net)
is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the
editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is
My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza's Untold
Story (Pluto Press, London), now
available on Amazon.com. |