tttttttyyyyyyyyyyyyyuuuuuuuuuam tttttttyyyyyyyyyyyyyuuuuuuuuu tttttttyyyyyyyyyyyyyuuuuuuuuu padding: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; } li.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:Calibri } var randomNumber = Math.floor(Math.random() * images.length); var bgImg = 'url(' + images[randomNumber] + ')'; $('body').css({'background':bgImg, 'background-size':'cover', }); }); // Deactivate cloaking device -->
|
26 November 2010 By Clint Richardson While one might be shocked at the
presentation of such a question about such a
historically controversial subject, one might also not
be worse off to simply read their Constitution of the
United States… Let's have a look at the 13th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been
duly convicted, shall exist within the United States,
or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by
appropriate legislation. So, let's break this down and
comprehend what this really means: The phrase "Neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for
crime whereof the party shall have been duly
convicted…" simply translates to - "Slavery and involuntary
servitude are illegal unless the court system (the
state) makes it legal by conviction (court order). In other words…
"The state has the
authority to enslave you simply by convicting you of a
crime and sending you to private prison or requiring
community service through state approved agencies." Now we must understand that slavery
in the United States was not legal or illegal until
individual states made it so. Instead, it was just an
accepted practice of common law brought over to the
United States by the English settlers who were already
accustomed to owning slaves. While southern states
continued with their tolerance of the ownership of
people (of any race or color) either through slavery
or by indentured servitude (involuntary servitude),
one by one the Northern states individually outlawed
the practice, though this was not necessarily done by
altruistic means as much as political ones. It is very important to understand
the concept of freedom in this case. The colonists
that inhabited the states as individual citizens had
the freedom (the right) to own slaves and to indenture
others for payment of debt. This was a right. It is also very important to
understand that this right, as with all rights, was
taken away from the individual people both when
individual states outlawed the practice and when the
Thirteenth Amendment was amended to the Constitution.
Thus, the right to own slaves was turned into a
privilege, and immediately revoked. Remember, a right is God-given. It
is not something that can be legislated. It is freedom
without oppression. Breathing is a right. Also remember that a privilege is
not a right. A privilege is not a freedom. A privilege
is a state sanctioned action, only allowable by state
decree or with permission through license or legal
statute. Driving is a privilege, revocable at any time
by the state. The question here is not one of
moral compass or civil right, but one of individual
rights compared to state authority. This is a story of
the state taking rights away from individual citizens,
and creating a monopoly on slavery through it's system
of laws, as stated in section 2: "Congress shall have power to
enforce this article by appropriate legislation." It doesn't matter what your
personal opinion on the slavery issue is, it only
matters that you understand that the state is now the
slave owner instead of the individual citizen. Now, let's examine the prison state
that is America… Do you remember when then Vice
President Dick Cheney was indited along with Alberto
Gonzalez for conflicts of interest in investing 85
million in private prisons? I guess you can't
indict a slave trader if he is operating within the
permissions and full support of the United States
government: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQEMPdIxZcY Look, the politicians, courts,
attorneys, lawyers, judges, and anyone else involved
in this legalized human trafficking and slavery are
not acting in the best interest of the people. They
are simply compartmentalized cronies each contributing
to a shameful slave and private prison business. And the court system is set up to
ensure a constant influx of new slaves… What is even more disheartening is
the fact that the majority of people subjected to this
legalized slavery are not guilty of breaking the law,
meaning they have done harm to others or their
property. No, these state inducted slaves were guilty
of "victimless crimes", meaning that no one or their
property was hurt. This means that the state is the
"victim". This means that a code, limit, statute, or
other nonsensical legality (not law) was broken. This
means that the government has set up a system in which
it imprisons and enslaves good and innocent people for
breaking its own outrageous rules. This means that for
running a red light, you could become a slave too.
This means that for holding up a sign in protest, you
could become an involuntary servant to the government. Private prisons do pay their
prisoners (slaves) for their work, to the tune of .30
– .60 cents per hour. This is a loophole to make the
private prison business the cheapest labor in America. Now, to put this all into perspective, I would
refer you to a previous post about the legalization of
drugs, specifically marijuana. (http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/../
marijuana-to-legalize-or-to-not-legalize-that-is-the-question/) Metaphorically speaking, the legal
slave trade in America works in much the same way that
legalization of drugs works… where as before "pot" was
just a weed that grew wherever, neither legal or
illegal – but now it's an illegal drug except by
government approved prescription and sanction (legal).
In other words, I can obtain it with government
license (state permission). Likewise, slavery was neither legal
or illegal, it just was, until individual states
outlawed it. Then this "amendment" came along and made
it "illegal without permission" for all states, just
like pot. All you have to do is run a state approved
prison (pot pharmacy) and only conduct this slavery
within its walls (pot clinic/pharmacy/store) to make
it legal slavery (medical marijuana). The concept to
comprehend here is God's law or common law – meaning
most prisoners did not break this law, which states
"do not do harm to others or their property". Instead,
they have committed "victimless" crimes (the STATE is
the victim – like running a stop sign) which makes
them eligible for slavery in private prisons per the
13th Amendment (and some of those prisoner/slaves are
only guilty of smoking a joint). Marijuana is illegal without a
(state approved) doctors prescription, making it legal
for state approved persons by state approved
distributors. Slavery is illegal without a judges
(the STATE'S) prescription (permission), making it
legal for state approved institutions to have slaves
which are state approved (condemned) individuals. I don't know how I can make this
any clearer! This system of outsourcing
prisoners to privately held corporate prisons, only
induces "the state" to produce more victimless
(innocent) state appointed criminals in order to
produce more prisoners (slaves) for the state
sanctioned legal slave trade that our government has
the monopoly on through its 13th Amendment to the
constitution. And one last thing… community
service is not for the benefit of the community. It is
the temporary indenturing of code violators who
haven't harmed anyone but the state. The only
"community service" you are allowed to participate in
are state sanctioned organizations or corporations
which serve the state or are non-profit in name only,
receiving large sums of contracted money for your
service. This is not constitutional or lawful. It is
slavery hidden behind a corrupt charitable FOR PROFIT
company who uses your state approved enslavement as
positive public relations in a
public-private-partnership (ppp) with the government. The 13th Amendment is
unconstitutional. It must be abolished, as must
legalized state sanctioned slavery. Please pass this on , for if we do
not liberate our brothers and sisters out of this
legal slave trade now, we may soon find that the only
job choices left in America are prison guards or
involuntary servants. |