10 November 2010 By Tariq Alhomayed I am not someone who prefers to engage in religious
debate, but some of the fatwas that have recently
appeared have begun to affect vital parts of our
lives, and our social relations, to the degree that
much will be influenced[by them] in a complex world
that will not tolerate any form of flexibility. The latest of these controversial fatwas was issued
in Saudi Arabia. The fatwa claims that if a parent
only occasionally prays, or not at all, then his
children are forbidden from kissing him on the head.
According to the fatwa, this is not permissible
"because this is love…to kiss [your parents] is an act
of love, and this is not permissible [if the parents
are not pious]. This doesn't prevent [you] from
treating them well, albeit in a secular fashion. Yet
manifestations of love, kissing the head and so on,
are not permissible". Therefore, the question is: If an individual has
ravaged the land with corruption, theft, murder and so
on, but remains committed to his prayers, fasting, and
religious rituals on the whole, then would it be
permissible for his children to kiss him on the head,
and glorify him with their love? Is this the way
things are measured? Is it permissible to tell Osama
Bin Laden's sons that they can kiss his head, to show
their respect and love, because he prays, despite all
the damage he has done to religion and the world? This
is a puzzling matter. The problem with these fatwas, and more so than
other ones, such as those prohibiting women from
working as cashiers, is that society will ignore them
because they are out of touch with the realities of
society, and the notion that we are informed about
religious matters. However, a fatwa prohibiting
kissing the head of a parent, if they are not
sufficiently pious, will pose a significant threat to
the family, society and the state. Matters such as this fatwa infringe upon the
relationship between parents and children, and this is
not a matter to be taken lightly. It makes the child
the overseer of his parents' behavior and practices,
and makes young people vulnerable to temptation and
extremism, led by others who are interpreting religion
as they please. This is something that we witnessed in
our Saudi society, when the seeds of extremism were
spread. We witnessed our friends flee the homes of
their parents, after they thought they could not
longer stay there, because of their parents had
"strayed from the right path". Unfortunately, these
people have ended up in the caves of Afghanistan and
elsewhere. I will never forget the sad and emotional words of
a bereaved parent, after the outbreak of a wave of
terrorism in Saudi Arabia. He said, regarding his son
who was lost in the midst of extremism and terrorism:
"I raised him for 18 years, and they changed him in 6
months". We all remember when terrorism erupted in
Saudi Arabia, and afterwards when several young Saudis
went to [join extremist groups in] Iraq. Some parents
claimed they had known nothing about their children
for months, or even a year. Their children went to war
zones, driven by the conviction that their parents
were misguided, and that they would exchange their
parents for pious guardians, who would set them on the
right path. Today, amidst this controversy, one only has to
remind themselves of what God Almighty said in the
Koran: "Thy Lord hath decreed that ye worship none but
Him, and that ye be kind to parents. Whether one or
both of them attain old age in thy life, say not to
them a word of contempt, nor repel them, but address
them in terms of honour".
Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq Al-Awsat, the youngest
person to be appointed that position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also completed his Introductory
courses towards a Master's degree from George Washington University in
Washington D.C. He is based in London. Comments 💬 التعليقات |