|
12 December 2010 By Mshari Al-Zaydi In Cairo, I attended a packed symposium on South
Korea hosted by the Al-Ahram Center for Political and
Strategic Studies. This symposium also hosted a
distinguished panel of speakers from South Korea from
all walks of life, including the media, business,
nuclear energy, education, politics, and technology
sectors as well as the diplomatic corp. The goal of the symposium was to increase
interaction and communication between the Arab World
and the South Korean Asian Tiger. The symposium aimed
to promote the South Korean model across the Arab
World, as well as review this model which stunned the
world, transforming South Korea into an industrial and
economic powerhouse on the international level in just
a few short decades. The South Koreans spoke well and made
recommendations as did the Arabs. It was fantastic to
listen to the words of Dr. Jaber Awad, an Egyptian
researcher in Asian Studies with a special interest in
South Korea. Professor Awad is the head of the Asian
Studies Department at Cairo University, and he is
responsible for a number of books and studies both
written and translated by Egyptian researchers on
South Korea. A group of enthusiastic Egyptian students studying
Korean at Egypt's Ain Shams University also attended
the symposium, and were warmly received by the Korean
delegation as being part of the new generation of
Egyptians studying and specializing in the language
and culture of South Korea. One of the best speeches was given by Professor
John J. Su or – as he told the Arab audience to
address him – Professor Amir. He is a head of the
Department of Middle Eastern Studies at the University
of Seoul, and he speaks Arabic fluently to the point
that he even told a few Egyptian jokes to the
audience. In his speech he said "I am bewildered by
the Arabs, for whenever I ask any Arab why they can't
make any real economic progress or development despite
the ready availability of the tools needed to achieve
this, many of them say – and this is an answer that I
have continually heard – that our enemies do not want
us to progress, and that the Arabs have many enemies."
Dr. Amir's speech was honest and straight-forward
and tinged with gentle reproof and sincere advice. By the end of the day I was truly hoping that any
of the attendees or researchers would answer the
question put forward by the Korean Orientalist. This
question caused me to do some hard thinking. For
example, the dangerous war between North Korea and
South Korea is nearly as old as the Arab-Israeli
conflict. The State of Israel was established in 1948,
whilst the Korean peninsula was divided in the
immediate aftermath of World War II, just 2 years
earlier in 1945. This resulted in the formation of the
North Korean government and the South Korean
government, with North Korea becoming part of the
Communist camp, and South Korea allying itself with
the Capitalists. The Korean War broke out in 1950, and
new chapters of this war are still taking place
intermittently. The last such action was North Korea
firing rockets into South Korea last week, threatening
to create "a sea of fire" against South Korea. Despite the presence of this complex conflict, this
didn't affect the grand course of South Korea's
development and success. How did they manage to
separate this conflict from the country's development,
and why have we failed in this task? I know that every case has its own special
circumstances, but this question must be answered! The success of South Korea's economic growth was
also not contingent upon political development (i.e.
democratic development) as was the case with regards
to many other Asian models. This raises the following
question: Which comes first? Does economic development
and success bring about political development or does
political development and public participation [in
politics] give rise to economic growth? The last thing about the Korean model is that it
shows us that we are capable of achieving success and
making significant development even whilst having
enemies and protecting and preserving our cultural
idiosyncrasies. Achieving such development requires us to have
nothing more than a vision, and the will and power to
execute this…and this is something that is by no means
impossible [to achieve] |