|
23 January 2011 By Tariq Alhomayed The first lesson that any lifeguard learns is not
to let a drowning man cling to them and drag them
under, and the first lesson that anybody dealing with
the Lebanese scene must learn is that you must not
march to their beat, but rather raise your engagement
with them to the state level. Prince Saud al-Faisal announced that the Saudi
monarch had given up on mediation with Syria with
regards to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, and
following this it was asked in Beirut "Is Saudi Arabia
angry with Hariri?" My [Lebanese] brothers, please pay
attention! Prince Saud al-Faisal said that King
Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz had spoken with Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad, head-of-state to
head-of-state, and when there was no forthcoming
commitment to what had been agreed upon, he gave up on
this agreement. However, the Lebanese then said
"Yes…but does this confirm that Saudi Arabia has given
up on Lebanon?" Yesterday, Prince Saud al-Faisal
responded to this, answering that it confirms that
Saudi Arabia has "only [given up] with regards to the
issue of mediation." However tomorrow the Lebanese
will ask, why did you withdraw from your withdrawal?"
This is a vicious circle that will continue in this
way; the Lebanese hole drowns everybody who tries to
enter it. The issue does not stop here, for during the
2006 war, when Saudi Arabia issued a statement about
the [military] adventurists, the Lebanese asked "who
wrote this speech?" and the answer was "what's the
difference? Everybody is loyal to King Abdullah."
This, of course, was a statement that was followed by
even more analysis [from the Lebanese]. The whole issue is one of wrangling, for the
Lebanese only hear what they want to hear, otherwise
how can we explain their disregard of the statement
issued by the Turkish Foreign Minister [Ahmet
Davutoglu]. The Turkish foreign minister, accompanied
by his Qatari counterpart, issued a statement [on
Thursday], announcing the end of their mediation
efforts in Lebanon. This came after the Saudi Foreign
Minister [Prince Saudi al-Faisal] announced that King
Abdullah had given up on mediating the Lebanese
problems. Davutoglu's statement was clear, he said
that his country would be halting its mediation
efforts because the Lebanese parties were not
responding…this was a very unambiguous statement, but
we did not hear any [Lebanese] response to this. In order to understand the problems [in Lebanon],
we must consider one simple thing whose symbolism is
clear, and that is that when [Hezbollah chief] Hassan
Nasrallah met with the Iranian President [Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad] in Lebanon during his last visit, this
meeting took place at the Iranian embassy. Ahmadinejad
was not taken blindfolded to meet with Nasrallah [at a
secret location], and this is because Ahmadinejad was
dealing with a subordinate or an employee. The same
applies to many others when they visit Damascus, for
the Damascus leadership does not come to them [in
Lebanon]. However when the Saudi monarch visited
Lebanon, he went and visited Hariri, rather than
having Hariri come to him at the Saudi Arabian
embassy, and that is a big difference! In comparison, we have all heard the complaints
made, for example, by Arab League Secretary-General
Amr Moussa, about the journey he was taken on in order
to meet with Hassan Nasrallah. We also do not know the
manner in which the Turkish and Qatari foreign
ministers met with Nasrallah a few days ago. Therefore, what we mean to say here is that states
cannot lower themselves to the level of sect or
militia leaders, meeting with them in caves or
rooftops. Tell me…is it rational for the Saudi Foreign
Ministry to deal with the fickle Walid Jumblatt? The
changeable nature of Mr. Jumblatt means that it would
be better for the Saudi Weather Service to deal with
him, for his changes in position go beyond even the
weather changes in our region! Therefore we say, there is no need for further
clarification, now is the time to deal with Lebanon
with the logic of a state, and if the Lebanese do not
respond, they are the ones who will pay the price;
their situation is getting progressively worse, and
this will not only affect them but their neighbors,
because there is no question that this fire will
spread to others.
Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq Al-Awsat, the youngest
person to be appointed that position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also completed his Introductory
courses towards a Master's degree from George Washington University in
Washington D.C. He is based in London. |