|
19 March 2011 By Dr. Hamad Al-Majid Did the call for demonstrations in Saudi Arabia
fail to convince the people? Yes. Was the main reason
that people rejected this call based on fear of the
security forces? No. Did the refusal to demonstrate
mean that there are no popular demands and no
important observations of the government's
performance? Of course not. What about the young men
who were behind the movements and major changes in
several Arab countries, have their Saudi counterparts
realized their ambitions or the majority of them to
the degree that they rejected the call to take part in
these demonstrations? No. Did their refusal to take
part this time mean that they will reject this call
every time? Not necessarily. Does the rejection of
demonstrations, marches and sit-ins mean that the
popular belief is that this is not the only way to
make their voices heard and to achieve demands and to
develop government performance and fight corruption.
Yes. Would the government be wrong if it slowed down
the process of fixing financial and administrative
corruption and solving the main problems concerning
the youth as a result of relying on the popular
refusal to demonstrate? Yes. Were the religious
scholars – whether they belonged to the Council of
Senior Ulama or any other government body – the only
ones who warned the Saudi population against
demonstrating? No. Were there some preachers among
those who warned against demonstrating who were
themselves at odds with the state once upon a time?
Yes. Did the government force them [to issue] these
warnings? No. Did the government even suggest that
they warn [the people] against demonstrating? No. Did
any of those preachers who stood firm against those
demonstrations and sit-ins sign statements and raise
the level of demands to a degree that disturbed the
government? Yes. Isn't this considered a
contradiction? No. Those who do not sympathize with
these positions do not understand the structure of the
relationship between the ruler and the ruled in Saudi
Arabia. Therefore it is not appropriate to look at what
happened in Tunisia or Egypt and other Arab countries
going through change and applying the "cut and paste"
method. Whoever says that every Arab country is
different is not lying. The strongest evidence of this
is what is happening in Libya and what happened on the
island of Bahrain as the circumstances and the givens,
the situations, the structures and the capacities of
the peoples, and the types of governments and their
references make up a complex mixture thus making every
Arab country individual. It is just like the doctors
who are strict with their patients about not taking
medication that is prescribed to another patient,
unless they are given an approved prescription, even
if they suffer from the same illness or share similar
symptoms. Those who suffer from heart problems do not
all require the same operation of opening the chest,
bloodletting a vein, and cutting nerves and flesh. A
catheter is sometimes a successful solution and if the
Tunisian, Egyptian, Libyan and Yemeni peoples were
forced to open the chest then the majority of Saudis
proved last Friday that the "heart" of their country
does not require major surgery, which comes with its
own risks and complex calculations. They are still
waging on [the idea] that a small catheter will
eliminate the deposits of corruption that have clung
to the veins of the heart of the kingdom and this is
more than enough. I believe that the next step (which is the most
important) is for the Saudi government to reward its
people, and the youth in particular, for the noble
position they took last Friday in rejecting the call
for demonstrations. It would be better if this reward
does not come in the form of an improvement to the
financial conditions only but [there should also be]
bold and tangible reform steps regarding strengthening
the principle of transparency and accountability. The
best reforms are those that come in response to the
beauty of the people who demonstrated their loyalty in
difficult times and not as a result of pressure
exerted through demonstrations, marches and arm
twisting to the degree that it is broken, which is
what happened in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Bahrain and
Algeria.
Dr. Hamad Al-Majid is a journalist and former member of the official Saudi
National Organization for Human Rights. Al-Majid is a graduate of Imam Muhammad
Bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh and holds an M.A. from California and a
Doctorate from the University of Hull in the United Kingdom.
|