|
20 March 2011 By Mshari Al-Zaydi The existing religious controversy surrounding the
legitimacy of demonstrations and protest marches
reflects a hidden political debate, and the
possibility of major future political choices. The Council of Senior Scholars in Saudi Arabia, the
largest official religious body in the kingdom, issued
a detailed fatwa in which it condemned the
demonstrations in the country, with language akin to
an urgent statement, and a clear religious stance
warning against the Kingdom descending into political
chaos. The position adopted by the Council, together with
a number of Saudi sheikhs who issued their fatwas in
newspapers and Saudi websites, was met with an
opposing religious stance by those who support the
demonstrations, protests and marches. Some Islamists
issued fatwas to legitimize demonstrations, or provide
pretexts for when they would be acceptable, stating
that the right to protest was as natural as rainwater.
In doing so, such Islamists were recently supported by
the Kuwaiti sermonizer Hamid al-Ali, who is also well
known for his enthusiasm for al-Qaeda, and Salafi
Jihadists. In Egypt, controversy has also arisen, and
continues to intensify, regarding the nature and role
of religious institutions. Selim al-Awa, a key figure
in the Muslim Brotherhood's intellectual current, has
published a book on the subject under the title "The
Impasse in the Religious Establishment", in which he
criticizes al-Azhar's failure to support the Muslim
Brotherhood's vision, regarding the role which
official clergymen are supposed to perform (rather
than being restricted to education, the judiciary,
preaching and public speaking, and leading the prayers
in mosques). An apparent struggle is being waged now for
leadership of both the fatwa tendency, and religious
institutions in the Islamic world. The opposition
Islamist current, especially the Muslim Brotherhood of
course, seek to draw the balance of religious
institutions towards their vision. However, government
authorities and states, or "Wali al-Amr" – as they are
called in doctrinal terms – believe that Islamic
scholars and religious institutions should help to aid
stability, but be entirely dedicated to education, the
judiciary, public sermons and so on. The two late prominent Saudi figures, former Grand
Mufti Abdulaziz ibn Abdullah ibn Baz, and Islamic
scholar Muhammad ibn al-Uthaymeen, were perhaps the
most prominent figures to have administered and
protected religious stability, and curtailed Saudi
hardliner religious currents. These two men issued
clear fatwas and stances ruling against
demonstrations, at a time when protests against the
state were at their peak, following Saddam Hussein's
invasion of Kuwait. However, the situation has now
changed dramatically after the emergence of the
internet and other communication tools. Here we see
old hawks transforming into peaceful doves, and then
changing their stances to switch back again when it
suits them, despite their feeble wings and worn
feathers. In brief, the religious stance regarding the
permissibility, or illegitimacy, of demonstrations and
other such issues does not matter in this context.
What matters here is that we go beyond the doctrinal
surface, into the political essence. Masses of
Islamists are eager to return to the old uprisings in
the 1990s, but this time using Twitter as their tool
of opposition, rather than cassette recordings of
revolutionary messages, which were common during that
period. The story here is not one of innocent fatwas, but
rather of political stances. Those who are in support
of stability, and seek to avoid Libyan fire or the
Egyptian political wilderness, will claim that
demonstrations should be forbidden. Those who advocate
revolutions, and opening the door to the unknown, will
say it is permissible to demonstrate. This story also has nothing to do with preserving
human rights. Hamid al-Ali is certainly not an
advocate of greater individual freedoms, nor is he a
fan of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Nevertheless, in his recent stance, we see him
suddenly overwhelmed with enthusiasm for such
principles. A Saudi journalist and expert on Islamic
movements and Islamic fundamentalism as well as Saudi
affairs. Mshari is Asharq Al-Awsat's opinion page
Editor, where he also contributes a weekly column. Has
worked for the local Saudi press occupying several
posts at Al -Madina newspaper amongst others. He has
been a guest on numerous news and current affairs
programs as an expert on Islamic extremism
|