|
17 March 2011 By
Stephen Lendman
Possibly it's ongoing and concealed.
All along, Japanese and Tokyo Electric (TEPCO)
officials downplayed or lied about the severity of the
crisis. Virtually nothing they say can be believed.
Nor from the Obama administration,
budgeting loan guarantees for new reactor construction
instead of decommissioning all 104 nuclear plants
because operating them risks full core meltdowns.
Partial or full ones gravely harm
earth, air, water and food. Three hazardous Fukushima
radioactive isotopes are especially
problematic. University of Rochester Professor
Jacqueline Williams, a radiation expert, says
ingesting radioactive iodine-131 causes thyroid and
other cancers. So does hazardous beta and gamma
radiation from Cesium-137. Released Strontium 90 also
causes
leukemia and other cancers. Large amounts of
all three are spewing daily.
Under a worst case scenario, millions
of Japanese, Pacific rim and northern hemisphere
people will be harmed, many gravely. Millions of
deaths may result. The dangers of nuclear power can't
be overstated. Potentially, all planetary life is
threatened. What better reason to end all commercial
and military use now.
Wikipedia
calls a
nuclear meltdown "an informal term for a severe
nuclear
reactor accident that results in core damage
from overheating." Partial or full meltdowns result,
releasing toxic atmospheric radiation.
Through nuclear fission, reactors
generate high heat to produce electricity -
essentially boiling water to create steam, used to run
turbines and generate power. Unless controlled,
dangerously high heat results.
Core meltdowns occur when heat
generated exceeds what cooling systems remove, causing
uranium and plutonium fuel to melt. At fault may be
coolant problems, including accidents, fires, loss of
coolant pressure, low coolant flow, or none at all
from high heat causing evaporation. In other words,
insufficient cooling elevates temperatures high enough
to trigger melting and toxic atmospheric radiation
releases.
Measured in rems (roentgen equivalent
in man or mammal), it represents the amount needed to
damage living tissue. All radiation is harmful,
cumulative, permanent, and unforgiving. The more
gotten, the greater the danger, especially doses over
100 rems, producing
radiation sickness, including nausea, vomiting,
headaches,
white
blood cell loss, and susceptibility to
infection.
Doses above 200 rems cause hair loss
and other harm. Above 300, significant internal harm,
including damaged nerve cells, others lining the
digestive track, the reproductive system, DNA and RNA.
Severe white blood cell loss also results, the body's
main defense against infection, causing vulnerability
to cancer and other diseases.
Moreover, radiation reduces blood
platelets production, making hemorrhaging more likely.
Doses above 450 rems kill half of those exposed. Above
800 assures death in days, weeks, or longer-term after
painful illnesses, including leukemia and other
cancers.
High atmospheric radiation levels
threaten life over the short or longer-term. The more
ingested, absorbed or inhaled, the greater the risk.
Fukushima is spreading large amounts. If unstoppable,
all bets are off.
On March 17, New York Times writers
Norimitsu Onishi, David Sanger and Matthew Wald
headlined, "High Radiation Severely Hinders Emergency
Work to Cool Japanese Plant," saying:
"Amid widening (global alarm), military
fire trucks began spraying cooling water on
(Fukushima's) spent fuel rods." Earlier, high
radiation levels forced back police water cannon
trucks. Japan's Self-Defense Forces dumped tons of
seawater on Unit 3, saying later it was ineffective.
Unknown is whether anything can work. In day six,
everything tried failed, raising grave doubts, a
frightening prospect if true.
Panic throughout Japan is increasing.
Some Toyko residents are fleeing. Everyone is scared.
Radiation levels are spreading and rising. People are
jamming airports to leave. Some embassies and
companies are evacuating their personnel. Inbound
flights are being cancelled.
An anonymous nuclear industry official
told The Times of India that TEPCO management is "in a
full-scale panic, (not) know(ing) what to do." On
March 16, European Union Energy Commissioner Guenther
Oettinger told an EU parliamentary committee:
Fukushima "is effectively out of
control. In the coming hours, there could be further
catastrophic events, which could pose a threat to the
lives of people on the island," and beyond.
In fact, global contamination is
threatened. Obama said radioactivity wouldn't reach
America. He lied. It will reach California by weekend
and spread east across the entire country and North
America. The industry-controlled World Nuclear News
warned of a "dramatic escalation in Japan."
Compounding the threat, around 600,000
exposed Fukushima spent fuel rods are stored
unprotected near the top of reactors, making them
extremely vulnerable to melting.
Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen said if they
catch fire, it "would be like Chernobyl on steroids."
Several fires, in fact, erupted. Others
could ignite any time. If one or more containment
vessels ruptures, all bets are off. Fears are it
already happened, making a bad situation far worse.
Fukushima is an unprecedented disaster, in unchartered
territory. Understating the potential catastrophic
risk is irresponsible and criminal.
On Wednesday, US
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) chairman,
Gregory Jaczko, told a congressional committee that
thousands of Unit 4 spent fuel rods have little or no
protective water, meaning they're exposed, melting,
and spreading toxic atmospheric radiation. He added:
"We believe that radiation levels are
extremely high, which could possibly impact the
ability to take corrective measures."
Fukushima has six reactors. All risk
meltdown. Experts believe a full plant evacuation may
be necessary, leaving reactor and spent fuel rods to
melt down, a potential worst case unstoppable "China
syndrome."
Late Wednesday night, the US State
Department announced a "voluntary" evacuation of
government personnel dependents and other US citizens
from northeastern Japan down to
Tokyo
and Yokohama. Charter flights will be provided.
Numerous other nations are urging their nationals to
leave.
Nuclear Power in America: How Safe?
On March 16, New York Times writer
Matthew Wald headlined, "Nuclear Agency Tells a
Concerned Congress That US Industry Remains Safe,"
saying:
NRC chairman Jaczko "told two House
Energy and Commerce subcommittees:
"We will continue to work to maintain
(a high) level of protection." Reactors are designed
to withstand "the most severe natural phenomena
historically reported," perhaps forgetting his
comments about Fukushima's unprecedented disaster and
its unpreparedness to cope.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu
claimed:
"The
American people should have full confidence
that the United States has rigorous safety regulations
in place to ensure that our nuclear power is generated
safely and responsibly. The administration is
committed to learning from Japan's experience as we
work to continue to strengthen America's nuclear
industry."
Chu, in fact, is deeply compromised, a
shill for nuclear interests since his days as director
of the
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL),
originally called the UC Radiation Lab. Today, the
Energy Department runs it, continuing its radiation
research, what it's done since the 1940s with little
regard for public safety or environmental concerns, as
true under Chu. In fact, he was picked as Energy
Secretary for his commitment to military and
commercial nuclear power, mindless of the
risks.
When asked in 2005 if fission-based
plants should be part of the energy-producing
portfolio, he responded:
"Absolutely," displaying a cavalier
attitude about its dangers in advocating for
"recycling" waste, when independent experts say doing
it spreads poisons causing cancer,
genetic
damage, and
premature deaths.
Chu also has longstanding ties to BP
and Big Oil that funded UC Berkeley's Energy
Biosciences Institute he founded a year before
becoming Energy Secretary. On matters of oil, nuclear
power, and other sources of energy, nothing Chu says
is credible.
Obama also has longstanding nuclear
industry ties, including with Chicago-based Exelon. On
March 14, Bloomberg said it operates "17 reactors at
10 stations in Illinois, New Jersey and Pennsylvania,
provid(ing) 20% of US nuclear capacity," according to
its web site. His former top political aide,
David
Axelrod, once lobbied for Exelon, and
Rahm
Emanuel, his former
White
House chief of staff, profited handsomely as an
investment banker arranging mergers that created the
company. In his proposed budget, Obama includes $36 billion in industry loan guarantees for new facilities, free money. He's committed to jump-start new construction, halted since Three Mile Island in 1979. Already takers are lining up, 20 or more applications pending before the NRC.
He and Chu downplay Fukushima, mindless
of industry hazards, including 23 US nuclear plants at
16 locations using the same failed GE-designed Mark 1
containment vessels. Earlier the NRC called it
susceptible to explosion and failure because of
cost-cutting design failures. Its 1985 study warned
that failure within the first few hours after a core
meltdown was very likely. Its top safety official at
the time said it had a 90% probability of failing if
an accident caused overheating and melting. When
reactor cooling is compromised, the containment vessel
is the last line of defense. However, GE's design is
hazardous and unsafe. No matter. In January 2011, Obama appointed Jeffrey Immelt, GE's CEO, head of his outside panel of economic advisers, replacing Paul Volcker. He'll also provide administration energy policy input. For him, Obama, Chu and other administration officials, public health, safety, and environmental protection are secondary to bottom line priorities. Unless popular outrage resists, America faces an inevitable nuclear nightmare, replicating or exceeding Fukushima.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/. |