|
02 April 2011 By Juan Cole OK, put your books away. We're having a pop quiz. Below are four quotes. Each is from one of two
sources: the Bible or the Koran, although, just to
make things interesting, there's also a chance all
four are from one book. Two were edited for length and
one of those was also edited to remove a
religion-specific reference. Your job: identify the
holy book of origin. Ready? Go: 1) ". . . Wherever you encounter [non-believers],
kill them, seize them, besiege them, wait for them at
every lookout post . . ." 2) "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace
to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a
sword." 3) "If your very own brother, or your son or
daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend
secretly entices you, saying, Let us go and worship
other gods' . . . do not yield to him or listen to
him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him.
You must certainly put him to death." 4) "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who
has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every
girl who has never slept with a man." All right, pens down. How did you do? If you identified the first quote as being from the
Koran (9:5) and the other three as originating in the
Bible (Matthew 10:34, Deuteronomy 13:6-9, Numbers
31:17-18), I congratulate you on that degree in
theology. If I have guessed correctly, most people
will not have found it easy to place the quotes in
their proper books. If I have guessed correctly, most
people will have found a certain thematic similarity
in them. Yes, there is a point here: I wish people would
stop cherry-picking warlike quotes from the Koran to
"prove" the evil of Islam. You see this stuff all over
the web. Just a few days ago, some anonymous person,
angry with me for defending "Fascist/Nazi Islam" the
writer says is trying to kill us all, sent me an
e-mail quoting Koranic exhortations to violence to
prove that Islam is a "religion of hate and murder." As rhetorical devices go, it is a cheap parlor
trick, a con job to fool the foolish and gull the
gullible and for anyone who has spent quality time
with the Bible, its shortcomings should be obvious. If not, see the pop quiz again. The Koran is hardly
unique in its admonitions to take up the sword. It is not my intention here to parse any of those
troubling quotes. Let us leave it to religious
scholars to contextualize them, to explain how they
square with the contention that Islam and Christianity
are religions of peace. For our purposes, it is
sufficient to note that, while both Christian and
Muslim scholars will offer that context and
explanation, only Christians can be assured of being
taken at their word when they do. Christians get the benefit of the doubt. Muslims
get Glenn Beck asking a Muslim Congressman to "prove
to me that you are not working with our enemies." Because Christianity is regarded as a known and a
norm. Muslims, meantime, have been drafted since Sept.
11, 2001, to fulfill the nation's obsessive, historic,
paranoiac and ongoing need to rally against an enemy
within. We lost the Commies, but along came the Islamo-fascists.
The names change. The endless capacity for irrational
panic remains the same. As in people who send out e-mails insisting upon
the rightness of holding over a billion people that
bears repeating: over a billion people responsible
for the actions of, what . . .? A few hundred? A few
thousand? Some of us use lies, exaggerations and rhetorical
gobbledygook to instill in the rest of us that
irrational panic they breathe like air. Yes, it is
only sensible to fear the threat we face from
terrorism. But panicked, irrational people are capable
of anything. Might be wise if we chose to fear that, too. This debate is worth listening to. The sound quality on Yasser Tabbara's side gets distorted towards the middle of the debate but because I believe that there is a harmony in the world, Jasser's ideas, from start to finish, are beyond distortion; their viral. Listen to the debate here (You need iTunes to listen to the 6:33 debate, and it is 10th on Roy Green's podcast for March) In this debate you can see that Tabbara speaks with veracity and it comes as no surprise that he is a lawyer. If you were wondering who Zuhdi Jasser is I wouldn't know where to start but here is a brief summary of Jasser: Who Is Zuhdi Jasser, Star Witness For Rep. Peter King's Muslim Radicalization Hearings? King has called three witnesses for the hearing,
none of which has any expertise in terrorism, law
enforcement or homeland security. The first will be
Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, a physician by trade who
moonlights as a self-described "expert in the contest
of ideas against Political Islam." The others are two
unnamed "American Muslims with family members who
became radicalized." The testimony of the latter two
will be anecdotal in nature, so a great deal of weight
will be given to Jasser's testimony as the only
"expert" fielded before the committee. |