|
28 May 2011 By
Jacob G. Hornberger A recent article about the First Amendment in the
Christian Science Monitor reflects how
differently libertarians think about religious and
educational liberty compared to non-libertarians. The
article is entitled "What If Public Schools Were
Mandated to Teach Islamic Creation in Science Class?"
by David Sessions, a 2008 graduate of Patrick Henry
College and the editor of Patrol, a culture magazine
in New York. In his article, Sessions takes conservatives to
task for trying to introduce Christian principles into
public schools, including creationism and daily
prayer. Since public schools are owned and operated by
state or local governments, Sessions correctly points
out that the First Amendment prohibits them from being
used to promote religious principles to the students.
As he observes, "Freedom of religion means keeping
religion out of government." Attempts to introduce
religious principles into public schools are, he
correctly states, "an attack on American ideals." He might have also pointed out that students are in
public schools because the law forces them to be
there. Thus, there is something unseemly about forcing
children to attend a government institution, day after
day for 12 years, where they receive some sort of
religious indoctrination. But which religion should be advanced in public
schools? As Sessions points out, that question will
ultimately be resolved through majority vote. But
suppose a school district fell within a heavily
Islamic part of town and that the school board voted
to approve the teaching of the Koran in school. Can't
you just see Christian people with children in that
particular school district going ape? So, how would libertarians address this type of
problem? Unlike Sessions and so many others, we libertarians
don't get involved in the debate over how statism
should be run. You see, many people just accept the
world as it is, statism and all, and then devote their
lives to trying to figure out how to make statism work
better or more efficiently. Libertarians, in comparison, raise people's vision
to a higher level, to a different paradigm, one
devoted to the principles of a free society. Rather
than taking positions on whether religious principles
should be taught in public schools, or whether there
should be prayer in public schools, or whether
students in public schools should be required to wear
uniforms, or whether students' lockers should be
immune from arbitrary searches, we libertarians ask a
much more fundamental question: Why should the state
be involved in education at all? Our answer, of course, is that it shouldn't. The
state has no more business providing educational
services than it does providing religious services. We
don't have the state building churches, or training
ministers, or forcing people to send their children to
church. Why should it be any different with respect to
education? We libertarians ask: Why not separate school and
state, in the same way our ancestors separated church
and state? Then, the types of debates Sessions
addresses in his article disappear. The free
marketplace would bring into existence the educational
services that met the wants and needs of the
consumers. People who like Christian prayer in school
would be free to send their children to that type of
school. The same applies to people who subscribe to
Jewish principles or Islamic principles. Atheists
could select schools that have no religious principles
taught in them. In fact, all the fights over how public schools
should be operated disappear with the end of
government involvement in education. Differences of
opinion on how children become educated become
depoliticized, given that the matter of education is
now in the private, free-market arena rather than the
government arena. Public schooling has been an absolute disaster, a
fact reflected by President Obama's decision to not
subject his own children to this state-run enterprise.
The time has come to stop trying to figure out how the
state should run its schools. It's time to raise our
vision to a higher level, one that separates school
and state, one in which we rely on the free market to
provide educational services. Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of the
Future of Freedom Foundation, a libertarian
educational foundation whose books include Separating
School & State: How to Liberate America's Families by
Sheldon Richman. |