|
19 Dec 2011 By Juan Cole The FBI released hate crime statistics for the year
of 2010, which showed that anti-Semitic crimes topped
the list of religiously motivated hate crimes. Islamophobes
have latched on to this fact to claim that "there is
no Islamophobia." For example, Robert Spencer of
JihadWatch asked: "What do you have to say about
the fact that FBI statistics show that there is no ‘Islamophobia'?" The American Muslim‘s Sheila Musaji
published a response to this argument, pointing out
that the argument is a non-sequitur: it does not
follow that "there is no Islamophobia" just because
there were more anti-Semitic hate crimes reported than
anti-Muslim ones. This would be like arguing that
"there is no anti-Semitism" because there were more
anti-black hate crimes reported than anti-Semitic
ones. In fact, Musaji points out that there was a
50% increase in the number of reported anti-Muslim
hate crimes. Any reasonable person would
think this trend to be concerning and ask: what is
causing this steep rise in anti-Muslim hate crimes? There is another issue here: it's a well-known fact
that ethnic minorities are less likely to report hate
crimes. One of the common reasons cited for this is
that such minority groups tend to distrust police and
authorities–which is certainly the case for Arabs and
Muslims, who have every reason to feel this way. Islamophobia penetrates law enforcement and
government on all levels, starting from the police:
the Washington Monthly had a very eyeopening
article on the subject: How We Train Our Cops to Fear
Islam. The FBI, the governmental institution responsible
for monitoring hate crimes, is itself brimming with
Islamophobia (see here, here, here, here, here, and
here). Many Muslims in America don't trust the FBI,
and wouldn't report hate crimes to them, for fear of
being accused of something themselves. This is exactly what happened to a female Muslim
student at the University of Bridgeport who reported
to authorities that a man was sexually harassing her;
not only was the man not investigated, but the female
Muslim student herself ended up being investigated by
the FBI after the accused molester called her a
terrorist. That's how vulnerable Muslims are in this
country: accuse them of being a terrorist and the FBI
will come knocking at their door. The chain of anti-Muslim bigotry goes even higher
to the Department of Homeland Security.
The House Committee on Homeland Security is led by
the fervently anti-Muslim Congressman Peter King. It
is Muslims, not Jews or people of any other
religion, who are subjected to such hearings. If King
had suggested holding anti-Jewish hearings, the
comparisons to Nazi Germany would be quickly invoked
(rightfully so) and the Congressman's career would
come to a swift end (again, rightfully so). Yet, when
this bigotry is leveled against Muslims, the reaction
is far more mild. This brings me to my second (and main) point: it is
Muslims, not Jews or people of any other
faith, who are the number one victims of
institutionalized bigotry in America. This
is something more pernicious than lone-wolf hate
crimes, because the effects of it are more
far-reaching. It is Muslims, not people of any other
religious faith, that were (and continue to be)
detained by the hundreds–without trial or
charge–and holed away in the hell-hole known as
Guantanamo Bay detention camp. This, even though it
was known by the government that "the vast majority of
detainees at Guantanamo were innocent." Most Americans
fail to realize the gravity of this injustice, and
continue to believe–like mindless sheep–that the Gitmo
prisoners are "the worst of the worst" and are evil
Magneto-style villains. People of the future will be
horrified that any sane person would think that
this is necessary: Who but the sickest and most deranged person could
think this is OK? Can you imagine the outcry had it been a Jewish
person who had been imprisoned like so by our
government? Even the idea is considered ludicrous. Gitmo is just the tip of the iceberg. Thousands
of Muslims have been imprisoned in Bagram ("the Other
Guantanamo") and there are probably tens of
thousands Muslims that have been detained by the
United States, without trial or charge, around the
world. They are subjected to typical American forms
of torture: solitary confinement (considered by human
rights experts to be one of the worst forms of
torture) and sexual harassment (including sodomy,
rape, and having their testicles electrocuted).
Mentally deranged guards routinely used dogs to
torture the inmates. Yes, it is Muslims who are the victims of
these horrific crimes. These abuses are carried out because the
institution that is supposed to protect American
citizens (including American Muslims)–the U.S. Armed
Forces–has instead been, in the words of the hawkish
Jeffrey Goldberg, "waging a three-decade war for
domination of the Middle East." Quite predictably,
the U.S. Armed Forces as an institution is rife with
Islamophobia. It is Muslim civilians who are being
incinerated by our bombs, missiles, and drones. Over
the course of the last two decades, the United States
has directly or indirectly caused the deaths of over
a million Muslims. America is dropping bombs on
multiple Muslim countries (the list just keeps getting
longer and longer); Americans feel comfortable
dropping bombs on countries they can't even locate on
a map. These are Islamophobic wars that kill way more
people than hate crimes do. It is Muslims, not Jews or people of any
other religion, who are the victims of civil liberty
assaults and Endless War. Glenn Greenwald writes: [W]ho are the prime victims of America's posture
of Endless War? Overwhelmingly, the victims are
racial, ethnic and religious minorities:
specifically, Muslims (both American Muslims and
foreign nationals). And that is a major factor in
why these abuses flourish: because those who
dominate American political debates perceive, more
or less accurately, that they are not directly
endangered (at least for now) by this assault on
core freedoms and Endless War… To see how central a role this sort of selfish
provincialism plays in shaping political priorities,
just compare (a) the general indifference to Endless
War and the massive civil liberties assaults… (ones
largely confined to Muslims) to (b) the intense
outrage and media orgy generated when a much milder
form of invasiveness — TSA searches — affected
Americans of all backgrounds. The success of Endless
War and civil liberties attacks depends on ensuring
that the prime victims, at least in the first
instance, are marginalized and easily demonizable
minorities. It is Muslims who are the victims of such
governmental abuses: Assassination of U.S. citizens; Indefinite
detention; Arbitrary justice; Warrantless searches;
Secret evidence; War crimes; Secret court; Immunity
from judicial review; Continual monitoring of
citizens; and Extraordinary renditions. It is absolutely crass to argue that there is more
anti-Semitism in America than Islamophobia. There
would be nothing less acceptable in our country than
anti-Jewish Congressional hearings. One could simply
not imagine imprisoning hundreds of Jews–without trial
or charge–in Guantanamo Bay. If the United States
caused the death of over a million Jews, people would
be calling this the next Holocaust. Such things are
simply unthinkable, except when Muslims are the
intended victims. Certainly, lone-wolf hate crimes are worrisome, and
Jews are one of the most targeted groups in this
regard. This is a serious concern that needs to be
addressed–as does the fact that there has been such a
steep rise in anti-Muslim hate crimes. But, we
shouldn't ignore institutionalized bigotry in
America, which is even more worrisome. Muslims are
the most vulnerable minority in this regard: they are
the absolute lowest on the totem pole and get the
dubious distinction of being the number one victims in
this regard. Lastly, it is very morbid the way the anti-Muslim
cyber-world is pitting the Jewish community against
the Muslim one. This is not a competition or game.
Hate crimes are not points or goals. Jews, Muslims,
and people of all faiths (or no faith at all) should
unite together to fight bigotry and intolerance.
After all, Jews are well aware of the tactics that
were once primarily used against them but are now used
against Muslims: it may be a different minority, but
it's the same message. * * * * * I encourage everyone to read Sheila Musaji's take
on the subject. It was her article that prompted me
to weigh in on this issue. Danios was the Brass Crescent Award Honorary
Mention for Best Writer in 2010 and the Brass Crescent
Award Winner for Best Writer in 2011. |