|
23 Jan 2012 By Keith Johnson Since Sept. 11, 2001, thousands of communities
across the nation have taken advantage of more than
$34 billion in central government grants to equip
police and sheriffs' departments with assault rifles
and exotic weaponry. In 2011 alone, approximately $2 billion in grants
were awarded by the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), along with $500 million more allocated to
existing programs. The accounting for this expense was recently
compiled by the Center for Investigative Reporting and
detailed in a report, "America's War Within: Homeland
security and the first 10 years of the war on terror."
After reviewing records from 41 states and
interviewing over two dozen police officials and
terrorism experts, researcher G.W. Schulz concludes
that police departments "have transformed into small
army-like forces." Federal grants are just one avenue police are using
to get weaponry like armored vehicles, grenade
launchers and M-16 assault rifles, suited to use on a
battlefield. In fiscal year 2011, the Department of
Defense gave away a record total of more than $500
million worth of military surplus to law enforcement
through its little-known (to the public) "1033
program." "Passed by Congress in 1997, the 1033 program was
created to provide law-enforcement agencies with tools
to fight drugs and terrorism," writes Benjamin Carlson
in a recent article for The Daily. "Since
then, more than 17,000 agencies have taken in $2.6
billion worth of equipment. . . paying only the cost
of delivery." That trend is showing no signs of slowing,
according to Carlson. So why is the government supplying cops with these
dangerous toys? The much-touted threat of terrorism is
no justification. The National Safety Council notes:
"You are eight times more likely to be killed by a
police officer than by a terrorist." A crime wave can't be blamed either. Since the
early 1990s, the incidence of violent crime has
steadily been on the decline, as more and more
law-abiding citizens arm themselves. Violent crime
peaked in 1991 at 758.2 per 100,000 people. In 2010,
there was nearly half that number—403.6 per 100,000.
The same can be said for officers killed in the line
of fire. The number of deaths peaked in 1980, at 104
per 100,000, compared to a low of 50 per 100,000 in
2010. The real reason these lavish gifts are being
provided is that it makes police chiefs and sheriffs
more accountable to the federal government than to
their own states and local communities. Those agencies
may soon be called upon to integrate with federal
troops—who may soon be allowed to patrol U.S. streets,
pursuant to the passage of the so-called National
Defense Authorization Act. There is also a growing effort by the drone or
unmanned aerial vehicle industry to market its
products to local law enforcement. In their 2011
annual report, General Atomics (GA), the nation's
leading manufacturer of Predator drones, made it clear
their future growth depends upon pursuing new
applications that will help create opportunities
"beyond the military market." Meanwhile, GA spent in
excess of $2 million last year lobbying Congress on
behalf of defense appropriations bills and larger DHS
budgets. Though normal American manufacturing and production
is at an all-time low, the defense industry is
booming. According to the Homeland Security Research
Corp., "The homeland security market for state and
local agencies is projected to reach $19.2 billion by
2014, up from $15.8 billion in fiscal 2009." According to economist John Williams of Shadow Government Statistics, the unemployment rate for the month of December 2011 was closer to 22.4 percent–not the 8.5 percent reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Obama's 8.5% is far removed from reality. To get closer to the real number, we must consult the (U6) figure that is often touted as ‘true unemployment'. This figure adds into the equation those who fall under the contemporary definition of ‘discouraged worker' and those who can only find ‘part-time' work. Today's definition of a discouraged worker is one who has not found work within the last year. Prior to 1994, a discouraged worker was defined as one who had not found work within the last month. That's a big discrepancy. If we add those lost souls back into the equation, we come up with a more realistic unemployment rate of right around 22.4%. That's less than three clicks shy of the 25% often cited for the worst levels of the Great Depression in 1933. That 25% unemployment figure was reflective of all workers both on and off the farm. Many economists, intent on disproving any comparison of today's unemployment with that of the ‘Great Depression', will often cite the non-farm unemployment figure of 34%. But it should be pointed out that during that time, 27% of America's employed worked on the farm. Today that number is only 2%. It's just another example of government math. They really think we are this stupid. |