Israel Plans Major Gaza War: Using
False Flag Incidents To Justify Attacks Or All-out War
03 Jan 2012
By Stephen Lendman
Israel already threatens war on Iran. It's also
involved with Washington, Turkey, Jordan, and other
rogue Arab states behind Syria's externally generated
insurgency.
Gaza's also threatened. On January 1, Haaretz writer
Amos Harel headlined "Will 2012 bring another Israeli
war against Hamas in Gaza?" saying:
Repeated Israeli air strikes and incursions target
Gaza. Perhaps they precede a broader offensive.
Israel's IDF chief Benny Gantz "said on Army radio
that 'Operation Cast Lead was carried out in a
professional, determined manner, and significantly
strengthened Israel's deterrent strength.' "
At the same time, he suggested another round of
fighting is likely. "Particularly worrisome (are the
alleged) weapons smuggl(ed) into the Gaza Strip. Hamas
and Islamic Jihad have....many thousands of rockets;
hundreds" able to reach central Israel, said Harel.
As a result, "the IDF is preparing itself for the
possibility of a land operation in another few
months."
On January 16, Jerusalem Post writer Yaakov Katz
headlined, "IDF preparing for major Gaza action within
months," saying:
"The IDF General Staff has ordered the Southern
Command to prepare for a possible large Gaza operation
that could occur within the next few months, the
Jerusalem Post has learned."
If true, preparations have been ongoing much longer.
Three years ago, Southern Command head General Yoav
Galant trained forces for two years prior to Cast
Lead. Plans involved inflicting major damage while
limiting Israeli casualties.
Now, said Katz, operational plans are being finalized
and distributed to IDF units to be deployed against
Gaza.
During Cast Lead, brigade units were used. They
combined armor, infantry and combat engineer forces.
Cast Lead's model will be replicated. Gaza Division
head General Yossi Bachar plans "significantly larger"
operations than last time.
"Every officer will need to know where he needs to be
with his troops and what his mission will be,"
according to an unnamed senior IDF official. "Gaza has
changed and the weaponry in Hamas' and Islamic Jihad's
hands has significantly grown in quantity and
quality."
Katz said Hamas' military wing is over 20,000 strong
in five brigades. Each has a number of battalions. "(S)pecial
teams" have "anti-tank missiles, mortar and rocket
fire and anti-aircraft shoulder-to-air missiles."
Orders to attack aren't issued. Preparations are
ongoing to be ready "at a moment's notice and if
needed."
According to an unnamed General Staff official, "Gaza
is possibly Israel's most volatile front today. It is
a front that can explode at any given moment." In
fact, Hamas and other resistance groups respond only
when attacked. Israel does it belligerently. Victims
are blamed.
Perhaps more slaughter's coming. If so, civilians will
suffer most. Israel calls them legitimate targets.
International law prohibits attacking them. Doing so
constitutes crimes of war and against humanity.
Nonetheless, they're standard Israeli policy.
Lawlessness and brutality define its agenda. War
strategy embodies them.
Israel notoriously uses false flag incidents to
justify attacks or all-out war. In June 1982, Arafat
was falsely blamed for Abu Nidal militants' attempted
assassination of Israeli UK ambassador Shlomo Argov.
War on Lebanon followed. Around 18,000 Palestinians
were massacred. Israel occupied South Lebanon until
May 2000. It still illegally holds Sheba Farms, a
14-square mile water-rich area near Syria's Golan.
It's also been lawlessly occupied since 1967 along
with Ghajar, a bordering Lebanese village.
If Israel plans Cast Lead II, expect one or more
manufactured incidents preceding it. The possibility
is real. Like Washington, Israel chooses
confrontation, not diplomacy; hostility, not conflict
resolution; and war, not peace. The business of both
countries is war. Expect new theaters opened in 2012.
At the same time, sham peace talks continue in Jordan.
Two rounds were held. Two more are planned on January
21 and January 26. Nothing's been accomplished. Israel
doesn't negotiate. It demands. Longtime collaborator
Abbas never represented Palestinian interests and
doesn't now.
WikiLeaks cables disclosed Israel informed him of Cast
Lead before launching it. During the slaughter, his
silence showed complicity. Defense Minister Ehud
Barak's telegrams to US deputy ambassador Luis Moreni
said Israel asked if Egypt and Fatah would take over
Gaza once Israel defeated Hamas.
At issue now is what do they know about possible new
attacks, and how will they respond if launched?
A Final Comment
On December 26, Israel's High Court ruled that state
and private Israeli companies may plunder Palestinian
West Bank quarries. Doing so violated international
law and past Supreme Court decisions.
Expect Israel to take full advantage. At issue is
controlling all Palestinian resources and valued land.
In March 2009, Yesh Din human rights volunteers
petitioned the High Court to prevent it. On January
10, they requested another hearing for
reconsideration. It posed the following questions:
(1) What are Israel's boundaries with respect to
Palestinian resources? In addition, under military
occupation, how do 1907 Hague Convention Articles 43
and 55 apply?
Article 43 says occupiers "shall take all the measures
in (their) power to restore, and ensure, as far as
possible, public order and safety, while respecting,
unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the
country."
Article 55 stipulates that occupiers are regarded only
as administrators with temporary possession over
"public buildings, real estate, forests, and
agricultural estates belonging to the hostile State,
and situated in the occupied country. It must
safeguard the capital of these properties, and
administer them in accordance with the rules of
usufruct," reflecting temporary possession only.
(2) Have long-term occupiers authority to grant its
citizens or corporations exploitive power over
territory not their own?
(3) May occupiers exploit the principles of
"continuity" and "reasonableness?"
(4) Do Israel quarries employing Palestinians justify
exploiting them?
Yesh Din said the High Court decision "revolutionizes
the international law of belligerent occupation, in
its ruling that the State of Israel, as an Occupying
Power in a prolonged occupation, has the authority to
grant Israelis and Israeli corporations the right to
quarry (Palestinian) natural resources, including in
quarries that did not exist prior to the occupation -
and with only limitation being the reasonableness of
the use of the natural resource."
In other words, what right has Israel to exploit
Palestinian resources lawlessly? None whatever.
In the mid-1970s, Israeli West Bank quarry operations
began. Ten sites exist. Eight remain active. Israel
declares them all "state land." They produce 12
million tons of mined material annually. Nearly all of
it goes to Israel.
In 1983, Israel's High Court ruled occupied areas
off-limits for "open field....economic exploitation."
In its December decision, President Dorit Beinisch
said the Court called the quarry issue political to be
settled under final status negotiations. She also
claimed Yesh Din's petition 40 years after quarry
operations began justified denying it.
Twisting international law, she said Israel may
"utilize natural resources in a reasonable manner"
despite no legal basis for doing so. She also claimed
Israel's decades-long occupation justified it. She
called it the "reality on the ground."
In fact, occupiers only have temporary trustee
authority. It excludes exploitation. It requires
administering natural resources for the benefit of
occupied people, not the occupier. Ruling otherwise
effectively justifies Israel's illegal settlements and
all stolen Palestinian land.
In this and other rulings, the Beinisch court trampled
on international law and lost legitimacy in the
process.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached
at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog
site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to
cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on
the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive
Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and
Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are
archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments