|
15 Feb 2012 By Tariq
Alhomayed The Lebanese political and media arena has been
thrown into uproar by the latest speech issued by
Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, during
which he said that God had blessed him with Iranian
funding! Many people in Lebanon have raised their
voices saying that this represents the first time that
Hassan Nasrallah has acknowledged that he is a
subordinate of Iran, and that he receives orders and
finance from Tehran; however, in reality, there is
nothing new about this! There is a simple reason for saying that there is
nothing new about this, namely what Nasrallah said
about his movement's relationship with Iran is
something evidenced by Hezbollah's actions over the
past years. This is something that could not fool a
wise man or a reader of history, or indeed anybody who
has monitored events in our region since 2000. Without
going into ideology, and even if one were unable to
analyze all these events and all the indications of
Hezbollah – and its leaderships – affiliation to Iran
from Nasrallah and his group's behavior and actions,
it would be enough to simply watch the video recording
– leaked on YouTube and later broadcast by a number of
Arab satellite channels – of Nasrallah himself
announcing that he is implementing the Iranian agenda
– the Khomeinist agenda – in Lebanon, in order to
confirm this. Therefore, Nasrallah's latest statement, in which
he said that "yes, we received moral and political and
material support in all possible forms, from the
Islamic Republican of Iran since 1982", was not – as
many believe – intended to deny the accusation that
Hezbollah is involved in drugs trafficking and money
laundering to fund its operations. Indeed, this is not
a new accusation, and Nasrallah responded to this
previously when he said "God has blessed us with the
Islamic Republic of Iran, which means we do not need
money from anywhere else." Therefore, Hassan Nasrallah
really wanted to say something else, particularly to
the Lebanese audience, and this is the crux of the
matter. In his last speech, Hassan Nasrallah wanted to
reassure his followers and supporters, saying: the
fate of Hezbollah is tied to Iran, not the al-Assad
regime. He wanted to reassure his followers that
Hezbollah's support, and the key to its survival, is
Iran, not al-Assad, for it is Iran that provides
Hezbollah with "moral and political and material
support in all possible forms", not the al-Assad
regime. This means that Hassan Nasrallah was telling
his supports: don't worry if the al-Assad regime
collapses, for our survival is not tied to the
Damascus regime, but rather the Wali al-Faqih regime
in Iran. This is the message that Nasrallah wanted to
send to his followers, and all the information
available indicates that Nasrallah's latest speech was
not well received by the al-Assad regime. Of course,
it is within the capabilities of some in Lebanon to
confirm this, particularly the agents of the al-Assad
regime; at this point they will know that the al-Assad
regime has read Nasrallah's speech in this manner, and
not in any other. Of course, this is the correct reading of the
Hezbollah chief's speech, for Nasrallah was now
acknowledging his affiliation to Iran, for this is
something that has existed for a long time, rather he
was addressing his followers in Lebanon and telling
them that there is nothing to fear if the al-Assad
regime collapses, because the party that supports them
"in all possible forms" is Iran, not al-Assad. Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq
Al-Awsat, the youngest person to be appointed that
position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also
completed his Introductory courses towards a Master's
degree from George Washington University in Washington
D.C. He is based in London. |