07 Feb 2012 By Tariq Alhomayed For the second time I am writing about the need to
arm the Syrian rebels. I wrote about this first on the
16th February, and I am repeating it now, because the
conditions on the ground in Syria are becoming
increasingly tragic with the brutality of the tyrant
of Damascus's forces. The objective of arming the
Syrian rebels does not stem from a desire for further
violence, but in order for the Syrians to defend
themselves and this is a legitimate right. What some people do not seem to be paying attention
to, whether in our region or internationally, is that
the al-Assad regime is heading towards an inevitable
demise, and this is only a matter of time. Yet the
cost of the regime falling now will be far less than
if it is delayed further, as the longer it takes for
decisive action on Syria, the more the Syrians will
suffer. There will be more killings, as Syria faces
increased chances of entering a state of alarming
collapse, bringing the country back decades, even
greater than the magnitude of underdevelopment caused
by the al-Assad regime, both father and son. Most
importantly of all, of course, is that the Syrians'
human suffering will increase, especially as the death
toll has been rising ever since the Russian-Chinese UN
veto, to the extent that now nearly a hundred Syrians
die every day! Of course, it must be said that there is no hope of
any reform in Syria now. It is inconceivable how the
Syrians could take part in the constitutional
referendum proposed by al-Assad in light of all the
killings carried out by the regime's forces. How can
we rely on any political solution when al-Assad has
not even put forward one officer to stand trial for
the killing of civilians, or even the destruction of
mosques? Therefore, the option of arming the Syrian rebels
is the most apt choice today, in accordance with what
is happening on the ground in Syria. Arming the rebels
will block the road towards prolonging the Syrian's
suffering. It will reduce the chances of the people
descending into a state of despair, for which we could
not blame the Syrians, even if they were allied with
the devil, let alone al-Qaeda [as some allege].
Likewise, arming the rebels now will create more
opportunities for the al-Assad regime to fall and
reduce the chances of the "Islamization" of the Syrian
revolution, or indeed the inevitable post-Assad era.
The other point we must note is that arming the
rebels will mean that it will no longer be necessary
to impose buffer zones with foreign intervention.
International intervention becomes more and more
inevitable the longer the fall of al-Assad is delayed,
and as soon as the Syrian rebels are armed we will
find that Syrian cities fall one after the other from
the hands of the tyrant. This in turn will create
further chances for defections, at military and
political levels, a phenomenon that has certainly been
delayed by the Russian-Chinese veto, which was a green
light for the al-Assad regime to kill the Syrians.
Prince Saud al-Faisal was right when he said that
those who used this veto bear the moral responsibility
for the killing of the Syrians. Therefore, arming the
rebels means that we are taking a stand with the
Syrian people, in contrast to Iran and Russia who are
standing by al-Assad, and arming him against his own
people. Finally, we must remember that what is happening in
Syria is a genuine revolution that al-Assad wants to
quell with fire and weapons, and therefore there is no
other way to deter him except using arms. Therefore,
arming the rebels will not prolong the suffering and
humiliation of the Syrians, but rather the longer the
fall of al-Assad is delayed, the higher the cost will
be. Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq
Al-Awsat, the youngest person to be appointed that
position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also
completed his Introductory courses towards a Master's
degree from George Washington University in Washington
D.C. He is based in London. Comments 💬 التعليقات |