|
30 March 2012 By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed Many people have been carried away by the idea that
the international community is facing one of two
choices: either accepting the Syrian regime or risking
civil war breaking out in Syria, which in turn could
ignite regional wars. This intimidation has succeeded
in changing the views of some foreign and Arab
governments and leaders, since last November, when the
Arab League withdrew from its intention to suspend
Syria's membership; a decision which had previously
been almost unanimously agreed upon by the Arab League
member states, with just two countries opposing this.
This great deception, namely that protecting the
al-Assad regime protects Syria as a whole, as well as
regional stability, is being propagated whilst the
reality is the complete opposite. Over the past ten
years, Damascus has played the role of the saboteur in
our region, masterminding the assassination of dozens
of Lebanese leaders, whilst the majority of terrorists
who have entered Iraq – carrying out numerous attacks
which have resulted in as many as 200,000 people being
killed – did so via the Syrian border. Damascus also
strongly allied itself with Iran and certain dangerous
armed organizations, such as Hezbollah, in order to
destabilize the security in our region. In this case,
how can al-Assad's departure lead to chaos, when he is
the main source of violence? It is true that the domestic situation in Syria was
previously quite stable due to the regime's control of
all aspects of its citizens' lives, via its almost
700,000 security and military personnel. This was the
true secret of Syria's "stability", but now after the
outbreak of the revolution throughout Syria, how can
the regime's survival represent a guarantee against
civil war? Indeed, this regime itself is carrying out
a civil war against the Syrian people; how can this
regime hope to co-exist with 25 million Syrians who
now consider it their enemy and regard its troops as
occupiers, particularly after the violent crackdown,
widespread killing and mass detentions? It is a delusion to believe that backing al-Assad
will prevent the outbreak of a civil war because the
Syrian regime will remain besieged, whilst rebel
groups will grow stronger and continue to attack the
regime in the coming years. Let us recall what
happened to the Saddam Hussein regime after his forces
were broken in 1991. The regime remained in control in
Baghdad, but most of the country suffered chaos and
rebellion. The central authority was unable to control
the rest of the country; practically speaking, Saddam
was in charge during the day, while militias and gangs
were in control by night. Accordingly, the regime
collapsed quickly in 2003, when US troops were able to
easily over-run the country and occupy it within just
a few days. Therefore defending the Syrian regime and believing
that its presence will guarantee regional stability is
nothing more than a delusion. It was not a guarantor
of regional stability in the past, nor will it be in
the future. Moreover, failing to take any action
against al-Assad – who is massacring his own people –
in the belief that this will prevent the outbreak of a
civil war will, ironically, guarantees the outbreak of
said war. Due to the policy of intimidation being
utilized by the al-Assad regime, and which has also
been adopted by groups in Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Egypt and
Algeria; al-Assad is disregarding all efforts,
mediation and means of resolving this crisis. Whilst
protests and killings are taking place across Syria,
al-Assad is spending hours on his computer downloading
movies via the internet. If this regime remains in
power, it will only do so by relying even more on a
axis of terror managed by Iran. Al-Assad's leaked
emails already clearly show how the Iranians are
directing him, even in the manner that he writes his
own press statements! The fall of al-Assad will certainly have painful
consequences; however these are nothing in comparison
with the danger of this regime remaining in power,
particularly after it has committed these terrible
crimes. If the al-Assad regime survives, it will pose
an even greater threat to its closest neighbours;
namely Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey. It will become a
safe haven for regional terror groups, whilst the
whole region will be drowned in wars masterminded by
Iran and managed by the al-Assad regime, which has
experience in this field dating back to the seventies.
The al-Assad regime has managed armed groups for four
decades, during which their activities covered most
countries in the Middle East and even reached Europe.
Al Rashed is the general manager of Al -Arabiya television. He is also the former editor-in-chief of Asharq Al- Awsat, and the leading Arabic weekly magazine, Al Majalla. He is also a senior Columnist in the daily newspapers of Al Madina and Al Bilad. He is a US post-graduate degree in mass communications. He has been a guest on many TV current affairs programs. He is currently based in Dubai. |