The Sign Of Satan "Khomeini" Exposed
From His Book "Kashaful Asrar"
30 March 2012By Ahmed Abdullah
We have collected some references from the book of
Khomeini "Kashaful Asrar" for the Sunni Muslims who
are deceived by the Shias that Khomeini was a person
who wanted unity between Shias and Sunnis and similar
stuff. Khomeini abused Prophet (s) and his sahaba in
his book "Kashaful Asrar" in the worst way possible.
Khomeini writes regarding the third Caliph Uthman:
We worship that God and recognise only Him as God
whose acts are based on mature wisdom and who does not
do anything against the dictates of wisdom. Nor do we
recognise such God who having built the edifice of
justice and piety on the exalted foundation of
devotion to God, Himself paves the way for its
destruction and ruin, and hands over leadership and
governance to such oppressors and scoundrels as Yazeed,
Mu'awiyah and Uthman.
Kashaful Asrar, p. 107
Than Khomeini titles a chapter "Abu
Bakr's opposition to Quran"
Under this heading, Khomeini says: "If you hold that
in case the Caliphate and Imamate of Hazrat Ali had
been mentioned, in so many words, in the Quran,
Shaykhain (i.e Abu Bakr and Umar) could not go against
it, and if they tried to do so, the general body of
Muslims would not have tolerated it (then it would be
pure wishful thinking). We will give a few examples,
here, of how they acted and gave decisions in open
violation of the dictates of the Quran and the Muslims
accepted them and not a voice of protest was raised."
Kashaful Asrar, p. 114-115
Than Khomeini titles the next
chapter "Umar's opposition to Quran"
He says " Here we will mention Umar's opposition to
Quran and will show that opposition to Quran was not a
huge thing for him. And if the word "Imam" had been
clearly mentioned in the Quran, he would still have
opposed it."
Kashaful Asrar, p. 117
Than after he mentions Hadith-e-Qirtas (Tradition of
the Paper), and after referring to the traditional
Shi'ite interpretation of the remark made by Hazrat
Omar on that occasion, he says:
"this absurd remark showed the kufr (i.e disbelief)
and heterodoxy of the person who is opposed to so many
verses of the Quran".
Kashaful Asrar, p. 119
The doomed Khomeini says the Prophet (s) was afraid in
preaching the Imamate of Ali because of the opposition
party, indirectly labelling Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and
others as the opposition party, and says they were
hungry for the government, rather he says they
embraced Islam for this very purpose.
"From these evidences and large number of ahadith, we
come to know that the Prophet (s) feared the people
regarding the preaching of Imamate (of Ali). And if
someone reads the books of history and reports, he
will understand that the Prophet's (fear) had a valid
reason. But God had ordered him to convey it and He
had promised his safety and he (i.e the Prophet) had
conveyed it too and he struggled for it till his end,
but the opposition party didn't let him accomplish his
job."
Kashaful Asrar, p. 130-131
Than while answering to the question that why don't we
see the Imamate of the twelve infallibles in the Quran,
he says:
"Suppose the name of the Imam i.e., Hazrat Ali had
been mentioned in the Quran to succeed the Prophet
(peace be upon him), how did it follow that there
would have been no dispute in the Ummat over Imamate
and Caliphate ? Those who had associated themselves
closely with the Prophet's faith, i.e., Islam for
years and remained attached to it out of greed for
power and yet had been conspiring and sowing discord
and factionalism to play their game, would they have
bowed before the pronouncement of the Quran and
abandoned their plan and objective. Would they not
have gone to any length of fraud and subterfuge to
attain their aim? Probably, in that event, a dispute
of such a dimension would have arisen in the Ummat
that the very foundations of Islam would have been
destroyed for it was very likely that those who had
accepted Islam solely for the sake of coming into
power would have openly resiled from it when they saw
that they could not gain their end by remaining
associated with it, and confronted it as enemies."
Kashaful Asrar, p. 113-114
Khomeini then sums up after putting forth the
allegations on the three Caliphs and other Sahaba in
the following words:
"The result of our discussion in this regard : We come
to know from the examples we have presented that
oppostion to the Quran openly amongst the Muslims or
secretly was not an extraordinary thing for Shaykhain
(Abu Bakr and Umar). The condition of the Muslims at
that time was such that they were either included in
their party for acquiring government, and if they
weren't in their party , still they couldn't dare to
say a single word against those who had oppressed
Prophet and his daughter."
Kashaful Asrar, p. 119
Perhaps this was the reason that he once declared his
companions to be far better than the companions of
Prophet (peace be upon him).
After all these proofs, can we still have some respect
for this doomed Khomeini? We have unveiled the satan
from his very own book, and now the proof has been
firmly established that this doomed Khomeini deserves
no respect from any sane Muslim. The Shias will still
practice taqiyah and defend this doomed person, but
this article is only for the Sunni Muslims, who are
fooled by the Shias that Khomeini was a flag bearer of
unity between Shias and Muslims. Rather he abused the
Prophet (s) and the blessed Sahaba in the worst way
possible. May Allah punish the doomed Khomeini in his
grave and in hell forever.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments