|
05 April 2012 By Tariq Alhomayed We are now witnessing Iran openly getting involved
in the Syrian revolution, after it was previously
taking action in secret to support al-Assad with
equipment and arms and more. Tehran has today taken
the decision to politically involve itself [in the
Syrian crisis], warning the international community
and regional states against any unilateral
intervention in Syria, and even offering the
possibility of helping out [in Syria]. Why is Iran
doing this now? The reasons for this are clear; Tehran wants to
send a public message to the Turks, prior to the
"Friends of Syria" meeting, warning them against
taking any practical steps. Iran also wants to send a
threatening message to the Gulf States, particularly
Saudi Arabia and Qatar, not to physically support the
Syrian revolutionaries. The other issue is that Tehran
wants to say that it is capable of convincing al-Assad
to take action, although this is unclear, for will
Iran, for example, convince al-Assad to depart? This
is something that is not believable, alternatively
have the Iranians truly been convinced that the al-Assad
card has been burnt, and they must therefore take
action to reduce their losses following his ouster,
which means that Tehran must play some role at this
present time? Some might say that this is madness, and
here the question that arises is: how could Iran dare
to say what it said? The answer to this is also clear, for as much as
the Iranians are aware of the intransigence of the
Syrian revolution, they do not see any seriousness on
the part of US President Obama to intervene in Syria.
Tehran believes that the Americans are hiding behind
Annan's mission, which has allowed the Iranians to
believe that this is also an opportunity to intervene
[in Syria]. The reality is that al-Assad himself
spared everybody the pain of saying that his
acceptance of Annan's plan was not genuine, for he
himself came out – after he said that he had accepted
this – to say that there must be more discussion of
Annan's plan. This led the US State Department to
express its disappointment, however the real
disappointment is in anybody – regardless of whomever
it is – believing in al-Assad's promises in the first
place. Iran's belief in the lack of seriousness on the
part of Obama has caused Tehran to venture to
transform Syria into a new Lebanon, in other words
that regional powers must sit down at the same table
to negotiate the future of Syria, as occurs with the
formation of any Lebanese government. However this
would be a critical mistake, and responding to this
overture would be a crime, for Iran must not be
allowed to do this, in the same manner that it was
allowed to control Iraq. What the American must pay attention to can be
summarized in the important view put forward by a
Syrian army officer defector, who said "as soon as
Washington announces the departure of AWACS [Airborne
early warning and control system] planes or unmanned
drones to fly over Damascus and the rest of Syria,
with the objective of monitoring military position
that they believe issue orders to target civilians…at
this time the world will be shocked by the number of
defections from the [Syrian] army" and this may even
increase the likelihood of a coup being carried out
[against al-Assad]. Therefore Obama, Europe, Saudi
Arabia, Qatar and Turkey must publicly announce that
al-Assad will not escape in the same manner that he
did following the assassination of Rafiq Hariri, and
that his departure is guaranteed, whatever happens. At
this time, the situation in Syria will begin to
accelerate, particularly if we move forward with
regards to arming the [Syrian] revolutionaries on the
ground; doing otherwise means that we have begun to
surrender our Arab states – one after another – to
Iran, and this would be a crime against our future and
security. Tariq Alhomayed is the Editor-in-Chief of Asharq
Al-Awsat, the youngest person to be appointed that
position. He holds a BA degree in Media studies from
King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, and has also
completed his Introductory courses towards a Master's
degree from George Washington University in Washington
D.C. He is based in London.
|