|
06 May 2012 By Abdul
Rahman Al-Rashed Authorities in Lebanon
were very enthusiastic after intercepting a ship that
passed through its waters, claiming that it was
carrying a cargo of weapons addressed "to the rebels
in Syria", and are now determined to hold those
involved accountable. The Defense Minister vowed he
would not allow investigations into the seized ship or
the issue to be diluted, and the President said that
he would fight the offenders. The "Lutfallah 2" cargo
ship was said to have been loaded with weapons in
Libya, and arrived in Lebanon by sea. Yet despite no
weapon emerging or being used, the statesmen are eager
to prosecute those involved. Lebanon claims to have
adopted a policy that can be found under the
international dictionary definition of "keeping a
distance", when it comes to dealing with the Syrian
revolution. However, this policy is practiced only to
avoid condemning the crimes of the Syrian regime, and
to justify staying away from the popular Syrian and
Arab sense of accountability. However, the Lebanese
authorities are not "distant" in as much as they are
an important factor for the Syrian regime. They were
not distant when they seized the Libyan cargo ship. In
fact, they were doing what Turkey did when it seized
the "Atlantic Cruiser" freight ship, loaded with
weapons and docked in a Turkish port, where it was
initially reported that Iranian weapons were found on
board, on route to the Syrian regime. Yet the Turks
subsequently resolved the matter and closed the case
file. In contrast, Lebanon has made the cargo ship a
prominent issue and is more enthusiastic about
pursuing the details of the case than the al-Assad
regime itself, which certainly does not pursue
smugglers with the same zeal as the Lebanese
officials. Lebanon did not
distance itself when a few dissident soldiers from the
Syrian army fled and crossed its borders. Rather, some
Lebanese elements arrested them and handed them over
to the Syrian forces, where they would face the risk
of being killed, thus contravening international laws.
As for cases when the Lebanese authorities have
distanced themselves, consider their silence regarding
the Syrian and Iranian embassies abducting people on
the streets of Beirut, in broad daylight. We have not
heard anything from the security or military services
or the presidential establishment about any effort to
investigate the kidnapped Ahwazi or Syrians in Beirut.
If Lebanon had chosen
to adopt the stance of "keeping a distance" and was
genuinely able to do that then we would be happy, but
we know that it is quite impossible to stop the
combatants, whether individuals or governments, from
using Lebanon's territory and its waters. What the
Lebanese authorities are doing currently is clearly
biased, keeping silent about the actions of the Syrian
regime and its affiliated parties that provide its
means to kill, pursue and propagandize, even using
state agencies and institutions in some cases. On the
other hand, the Lebanese state is harnessing all its
capabilities to pursue Syrian revolutionaries or
restrict them, as we see in the investigations into
the "Lutfallah 2" smuggling attempt, because the ship
passed through a Lebanese port, until it became a
matter that the President and the Defense Minister
pledged to follow up. This eagerness to
please Damascus on the part of the Lebanese
authorities will not come to the aid of the tottering
al-Assad regime. Instead, it will anger governments
working with the other side, such as the Gulf States
and the West, and it will shock the majority of the
Arab people, and these countries are the most
important to Lebanon. Lebanon will remain
the main arena for Syrian events, regardless of their
developments and how they end. If Lebanon does not
want this to be the case then when it declares it has
distanced itself it must actually prove it, either
through refusing to cooperate with both Syrian sides,
or turning a blind eye to all violations. It is expected that
the Lebanese should support change in Damascus, and
support the overthrow of a regime that has exhausted
and ravaged Lebanon with wars and interventions, not
even hesitating to plunder the savings of its citizens
and banks. The revolution in Syria in fact reflects
the age old demands of the Lebanese. The truth is that the
fall of the regime in Damascus will not only liberate
the Syrians, but it will also liberate Lebanon and its
people. Al Rashed is the general manager of Al -Arabiya
television. He is also the former editor-in-chief of
Asharq Al- Awsat, and the leading Arabic weekly
magazine, Al Majalla. He is also a senior Columnist in
the daily newspapers of Al Madina and Al Bilad. He is
a US post-graduate degree in mass communications. He
has been a guest on many TV current affairs programs.
He is currently based in Dubai. |