Cyberwarfare: Cheap Yet Destructive -
Point To Israel's Recent Announcement
16 June 2012By Osman Mirghani
Once more, we see reports surface about the
"Cyberwarfare" that is taking place behind the scenes
in our region following the revelation last week about
the new "Flame" virus that is targeting Iran's oil
industry, stealing important data and information from
computers belonging to Iranian government institutions
and state officials. This is taking place within the
framework of a secret war that is being waged to
incapacitate Iran's nuclear ambitions. According to
experts, the "Flame" virus is twenty times stronger
than the Stuxnet worm which also sought to disable
Iran's nuclear facilities. The Stuxnet worm was
revealed in 2010 when it was accidently "leaked" onto
the internet from Iranian institutions, infecting
computers in other parts of the world that were not
the original targets of this electronic attack.
As for who is behind the electronic attacks
targeting Iran, suspicion immediately fell on both the
US and Israel, whilst it has been claimed that other
parties were also involved in these operations, which
took place in complete secrecy, in line with
Washington and Tel Aviv's tradition of silence
regarding intelligence operations. However these
suspicions remained unconfirmed until a few days ago
when the New York Times published a dramatic report [Obama
Orders Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran;
1/6/2012], by David E. Sanger. These revelations are
the result of Sanger conducting a number of interviews
with current and former American, European and Israeli
officials, over a period of 18 months, as part of
research into a book [Confront and Conceal: Obama's
Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power] on
this secret war, which was published earlier this
week. The detailed information revealed in this book
and which is based on statements from officials in the
Obama administration represents the first official
acknowledgement that the US and Israel were behind the
Stuxnet worm as part of a secret Cyberwarfare program
codenamed "Olympic Games", whose objective was to
disable Iran's nuclear program .
It has been revealed that this program began in the
last years of the George W. Bush administration, as an
alternative to risky air strikes against Iran.
Sanger's book reveals that Bush gave Obama two pieces
of advice when he handed over the keys of the White
House; he advised his successor to preserve the
Cyberwarfare program against Iran, as well as the
unmanned drone program targeting Al Qaeda leaders.
This is advice that Obama enthusiastically followed,
to the point that his presidency is seen an escalation
in the "secret" war on both fronts. Whilst air strikes
from unmanned drones is something that cannot be
concealed from the general public, the electronic war
remained under wraps for approximately two years
before the Stuxnet worm brought this to the attention
of the public after this worm was leaked onto the
internet as a result of a programming mistake. What is
particularly ironic is that Colonel Gaddafi
contributed, without knowing it, to the development of
Cyberwarfare and the US's attack on Iran. This is
because the US benefited from the Libyan nuclear
program which Gaddafi surrendered to Washington after
giving up his nuclear ambitions in exchange for the
lifting of international sanctions on Libya. In fact,
the US even used this to contrast a model of the
Iranian nuclear reactor to test their electric attacks
on.
What is even more ironic than this is that Iran itself
contributed to this attack, due to its confused
response, which led Tehran to close many state
apparatus, and then even deny that it had been
affected by the Stuxnet worm; thereby wasting a lot of
time before hiring Russian and Ukrainian experts to
identify the Stuxnet worm. Despite Iran later
announcing that it was establishing an Cyberwarfare
unit and claiming that it was capable of repelling any
attacks, and even mounting counter-attacks, Tehran's
capabilities in the field of Cyberwarfare remains
limited, as can be seen in Iran today falling victim
to the "Flame" virus, which is even more dangerous
than the Stuxnet worm. This virus is even more
dangerous than the Stuxnet worm because it was created
for espionage purposes, namely to steal important
information, whilst this information can then be
utilized in more conventional attacks, and it is
likely that such information was utilized in
assassination operations targeting agents and
officials working in Iran's nuclear and missile
programs.
Cyberwarfare has become a reality, and will no doubt
become a key feature in future wars. This is something
that will not only affect Iran, for nobody will be
safe from electronic warfare, particularly as this is
an inexpensive but destructive form of warfare that
does not require large armies, whilst Cyber-attacks
can be launched from remote locations, indeed those
launching such attacks can remain protected, and
perhaps even unidentified. Therefore if some hackers,
for example, are able to infiltrate or incapacitate
superpowers' state institutes, waging wars across
borders, then what about a state's capability to carry
out electronic attacks; this is something that could
completely paralyze rival state's by targeting the
computer systems used for banking, electric powers
plants or even air traffic control, infiltrating a
state's basic services.
There are many indications that countries across the
world have begun to develop their Cyberwarfare
capabilities, including their offensive and defensive
capabilities, making great strides in this field,
particularly America, China, Russia and Israel. Whilst
the facts on the ground confirm that extremist
organizations and terrorist groups are also interested
in the electronic sphere, utilizing this for public
relations purposes, as well as recruitment, in
addition to publishing training manuals and explosives
handbooks online. There can be no doubt that these
same groups are seeking to develop their Cyberwarfare
capabilities, particularly as they depend on the
strategy of utilizing inexpensive attacks with the
largest possible death toll in order to incite chaos
and intimidate the public.
This leads one to ask whether Arab states are prepared
for wars such as this, particularly as such wars are
already taking place, and Arab states may already be
involved in this? What is the benefit of having the
most advanced arsenal if the state is unprepared to
protect itself from electronic attacks? What use are
convention weapons if the enemy is a spectre and the
source of the [electronic] attacks remains unknown?
Indeed, what if the state is not capable of
confronting possible electronic attacks that may seek
to paralyze daily life and incite chaos by targeting
and incapacitating power plants, government
institutions, banks and other sensitive economic
institutions?
The Arab states, who are present in one of the most
volatile regions of the world, cannot avoid the threat
posed by electronic warfare; otherwise they will –
sooner or later – pay a very high price. If we need to
increase concerns over this issue, then we need only
point to Israel's recent announcement that it intends
to be one of the five most powerful countries in
Cyberwarfare.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments