Israel Releases Player, Protests
Continue: Palestinian Soccer Player Mahmoud Al-Sarsak
(L) Well Received
30 July 2012
By Karin Friedemann
Palestinian soccer player Mahmoud Al-Sarsak (L) is
greeted upon his arrival in Gaza City July 10, 2012.
Israel released the Gaza soccer player on Tuesday in a
deal to end his intermittent four-month hunger strike
after he spent three years behind bars without being
put on trial, officials said.
"I thank God and all the athletes in the world,"
Mahmoud Sarsak told a Ma'an reporter as he was
transferred to Shifa hospital in Gaza City for medical
attention after being released in a "rapturous
welcome" to relatives who were gathered in great
celebration at the Palestinian side of the Israeli
Erez crossing in northern Gaza on Tuesday. ESPN
reports that "Islamic militants" fired rifles in the
air in a rousing homecoming for a beloved member of
the Palestinian national soccer team who was released
by Israel after being held for three years in prison
without charge, trial, or contact with his family.
South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu, American author
Alice Walker and others had chimed in to support his
release. Sarsak, the jailed Gazan soccer star, freed
on July 10, 2012 due to massive international
attention, had been detained on his way to a national
team match on the West Bank in 2009. While
participating in a hunger strike by 2,000 Palestinian
prisoners, Sarkar lost almost half of his body weight.
Shuaib Ahmed commented in the Morning Bark that "the
world remains, as it always has been – hesitatingly
observant."
The Palestinian plight was brought to world attention
by the campaign to free Sarsak. Palestinian National
Team players are often blocked at checkpoints, jailed,
or even killed. Sarkar's arrest was part of a broader
effort to degrade his "national team without a
nation."
British comedian Mark Steel joked in the UK's
Independent that the Palestinians "were employing that
old terrorist tactic of becoming the national football
team, then qualifying for the World Cup finals from
where it's a simple step to start an insurrection."
Energetic protesters in the stands in Scotland added
to the 8-0 humiliation of the Israeli national women's
team in a European championship match on June 17. The
Israeli national anthem was also booed before
kick-off. In Wales, Israel lost 5-0, and in France,
protesters actually invaded the pitch to pressure
Israel regarding Sarkar's life.
An Israeli Embassy functionary responded that Sarsak
was a terrorist and that calling him a "young
Palestinian footballer" was "insulting to
footballers."
FIFPro, the international federation of professional
footballers, stated that no other Palestinian
footballers should have to go through what Sarsak has
experienced. Yet there are two other Palestinian
football stars held in indefinite detention, prevented
from playing for Palestine.
President of the Palestinian Football Association,
Jabril Rajoub, asked UEFA president Michel Platini to
remember Olympic squad goalkeeper Omar Abu Rois and
Ramallah player Mohammed Nimr, detained without charge
by Israel.
"For athletes in Palestine, there is no real freedom
of movement and the risks of being detained or even
killed are always looming before their eyes." Since
Israel is in "direct violation of FIFA regulations and
the International Olympic Charter," Rajoub implored,
"we ask Your Excellency to not give Israel the honour
to host the next UEFA Under-21 Championship 2013."
A similar plea was sent by 42 Palestinian football
clubs based in Gaza, home to many of the world's best
football players.
Platini continues to ignore requests from concerned
citizens, stating, "We cannot hold the Israeli
Football Association responsible for the political
situation in the region or for legal procedures in
place in its country."
What I want to understand is, if you knew that your
country imprisoned a fellow athlete, how could you
play for your country? I mean, given the obviousness
of the treachery your playing would imply. How could
any Israeli footballer, in good conscience, agree to
play under these circumstances? And if you were an
Israeli that chose to play, how should we look at you?
Should we applaud your gains and cry for your losses,
knowing that you didn't care about simple obvious
human rights issues regarding fellow players living
close to you? Why are the Israeli teams not refusing
to play another game? I would, if I were them.
For an explanation, let us look at the recent past.
In June, 2012, 12 year old Gazan Mamoun Hassouna was
killed while playing football.
In 2011 Palestinian players flying in from a game in
Thailand were prevented entry into the West Bank.
Mohammed Samara and right back Majed Abusidu therefore
missed the return game at home five days later.
In 2010, Gaza and West Bank winners had to postpone
their cup final because the Gazan team was refused
permission to travel. Also that year, Israel refused
to allow six members of the Palestinian national team
to travel from Gaza to Jordan for a match against
Mauritania.
Ahmed Keshkesh was prevented from returning home for
months.
During Operation Cast Lead in winter 2008-9, Israel
was responsible for leveling much of Gaza including
the Rafah National Stadium, and killing football
players Ayman Alkurd, Shadi Sbakhe and Wajeh Moshate,
as well as over 1400 other citizens.
In May 2008, the national team was not able to attend
the AFC Challenge Cup, denying them qualification for
the 2011 Asia Cup.
In 2006, Israeli missiles destroyed Gaza's only
football stadium.
Palestine had reached the top of their group in the
qualifying rounds for the 2006 World Cup. They failed
to qualify after the Israeli authorities refused
permission for five key players to travel to a match
against Uzbekistan in Qatar on September 7, 2005.
In 2005, while playing football, Ashraf Samir Ahmad
Mussa and Khaled Fuad Sahker Ghanam, and Hassan Ahmad
Khalil Abu Zeid, were shot dead by Israeli soldiers.
There are countless other such incidents. None of that
is really news, just banality of evil. What is news is
that international pressure freed one Palestinian
prisoner. Dave Zirin reports in the Nation: "Not only
does Sarsak live but the movement lives as well. It's
been strengthened by Sarsak's survival and the
revelation for many that the thankless, frustrating
and often devastating work of international solidarity
with political prisoners can actually work."