|
12 August 2012 By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed Perhaps the al-Assad regime will survive for
another two or three months, or perhaps even six
months, before its inevitable collapse. Nobody can
predict the precise period of time it will survive,
however there are two certainties. Firstly, that the
collapse of the al-Assad regime is indeed inevitable
and is just a matter of time. Secondly, that al-Assad
and his allies are capable of harming the Syrian
people and the region as a whole during this period.
The regime is highly skilled at sabotage, and is
notorious for this. The recent developments in Syria,
such as the decline in the success of the rebels, not
to mention the regime extending the conflict to
encompass Lebanon, via kidnappings and bombings, means
that it is now a necessity to supply the rebels with
arms. The regime began carrying out air strikes
against civilian areas a few months ago, which is
something that rarely occurs during civil wars, and
this cannot be ignored by the international community.
The rebels, meanwhile, have only been able to shoot
down one plane, capturing the pilot. This is not due
to a shortage of ammunitions, but because the rebels
do not possess sufficiently sophisticated weapons
capable of shooting down warplanes or gunships.
Therefore we are witnessing a completely unequal
battle, and this situation will remain the same unless
something changes, namely a "wounded" regime whose
collapse is inevitable, but which is still able to
carry out the wholesale slaughter of the Syrian
people. We are well aware that there are several
considerations behind depriving the rebels from such
arms. The most important reason is the evident chaos
that exists within the Syrian revolutionary camp,
particularly the multiplicity of the rebels' political
orientation and identity. The Israelis, along with
their allies, completely reject the Syrian rebels
being provided with any anti-tank or anti-aircraft
weaponry, in the fear that this may end up being used
against their own forces, in the same manner that
"Stinger" missiles provided to Afghanistan rebels
ended up in the hands of Pakistani militants. Such
missiles were later found buried in Saudi Arabia
approximately ten years ago, whilst they also suddenly
appeared during the Qatari national armed forces show.
Like the Israelis, the Turks also fear heavy weapons
falling into the hands of the left-wing Kurdistan
Workers Party [PKK], which has been accused of
carrying out a number of terrorist operations on
Turkish soil. Of course, much of the fear is due to
the confirmed presence of extremist groups in Syria.
The Syrian regime previously backed Al Qaeda during
the Iraqi crisis, and it may be responsible for
opening the country to such extremist groups, in an
attempt to strengthen its accusation against the
rebels and frighten the west with the notion that the
only alternative to it is radical Islamic groups, such
as Al Qaeda and al-Shabaab organizations in Somalia.
Indeed all regional countries are concerned by this,
not just Israel, Turkey and the Western states. This
is the strategy of Syria, Iran and even Russia, namely
to intimidate the region that extremist groups will
replace Bashar al-Assad. Despite the relevance of these concerns, the
"equation" on the ground in Syria remains the same.
The regime is slowly collapsing, the country is
crumbling and extremist groups are becoming stronger,
at the expense of national Syrian forces that have
been protesting and fighting for the past 18 months.
However the fear regarding an extremist alternative to
the al-Assad regime is nothing more than a ridiculous
excuse, since there are technical and effective
solutions that can ensure the delivery of heavy arms
to the opposition whilst minimizing the risks. Leaving
this wounded regime unchallenged for months to come
will only allow it more opportunities to commit
massacres, whilst its allies can commit similar
massacre in Lebanon and elsewhere, exposing the region
to more danger and chaos. Indeed, the regime has
explicitly pledged to incite chaos, both at home and
abroad. Major countries, including Turkey, have been unable
to establish a no-fly zone above Syria, avoiding a
confrontation with powers such as Russia. In addition
to this, there is also a lack of support for the
Syrian rebels, preventing them from hastening the
collapse of the regime in Damascus. This means that
there is no obvious exit out of this complex
situation. However with the collapse of the al-Assad
regime, there will be nothing to justify confrontation
with Russia, whilst Iran will have no choice but to
accept dealing with the new status-quo. At this time,
all the disagreement will be on how to manage this new
Syria. So, the key is to strengthen the Syrian rebels and
allow them to neutralize the regime's air force and
heavy armour. If they had been granted the ability to
do this, then the "equation" on the ground would have
changed one month ago, following the bombing of the
national security headquarters in Damascus, which was
followed by the rebels taking over a number of the
capital's neighbourhoods. However the Syrian rebels
were forced to retreat in the face of the regime's
gunships, tanks and heavy weaponry, particularly as
they are only able of confronting the regime with
light weaponry.
Al Rashed is the general manager of Al -Arabiya
television. He is also the former editor-in-chief of
Asharq Al- Awsat, and the leading Arabic weekly
magazine, Al Majalla. He is also a senior Columnist in
the daily newspapers of Al Madina and Al Bilad. He is
a US post-graduate degree in mass communications. He
has been a guest on many TV current affairs programs.
He is currently based in Dubai. |