Ruling On Arab Nationalism And
Undermining The Position Of The Prophet (Peace And
Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him)
Islamic Rulings -
Living Shariah Verdicts
Islamic Questions & Answers
What is your opinion of one who is asked, "Which
is better in your view, your Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) or your language?"
and he answers. "My language"? Is he an apostate if he
says that, whether in jest or out of ignorance?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
We do not see how you can compare between something
tangible and something intangible, so how can the
person say that the language – which is an intangible
thing – is better than the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) – who is a tangible
thing, i.e., a person?
If we think about it we will realize that the matter
may be taken in two ways, one that has to do with the
questioner and one that has to do with the respondent.
With regard to the respondent: it may be that he
understands "language" as referring to Arab
nationalism – as it seems that they are Arabs and are
talking about the Arabic language – and that he
understands the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) as referring to Islam. In this case it is
possible to compare the two things and ask questions
about them.
With regard to the questioner, he wants to draw
attention to his exaggerated respect for his language
by comparing it to something that is venerated by the
Muslims, namely the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him), so he asks him if his language is
greater than the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him).
Secondly:
If the first interpretation is correct, then the
respondent has fallen into kufr, because Arab
nationalism is a jaahili call that involves kufr,
criticizes Islamic sharee'ah and divides Muslims,
joining Muslims to non-Muslims on the basis of the
Arabic language. In their view an Arab kaafir is
closer and dearer to them than a non-Arab Muslim. This
is clearly kufr and disbelief in Islam and its laws.
The nationalist poet Fakhri al-Baroodi said:
The Arab lands are my homeland, from Damascus to
Baghdad
From Najd to Yemen to Egypt to Tetouan (Morocco)
No border separates us and no religion divides us
The language of al-daad (i.e., Arabic) unites us with
Ghassaan and ‘Adnaan.
Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy
on him) was asked:
What is your opinion on the call for nationalism which
believes that belonging to a race or language takes
precedence over belonging to a religion, and these
groups claim that they do not oppose religion, but
they give nationalism precedence over it. What is your
opinion of this call?
He replied:
This is a jaahili call, and it is not permissible to
join it or encourage those who promote it. Rather it
must be put an end to, because Islamic sharee'ah
opposes it and rejects it. We should refute their
specious arguments and claims with that which makes
the truth clear to those who seek it. Islam is the
only thing that preserved Arabness in language,
literature and culture. Rejecting Islam leads to
destroying Arabness in language, literature and
culture. Hence the daa'iyahs should strive their
utmost to call people to Islam just as the
colonialists are striving their utmost to destroy it.
It is a well known principle of Islam, that no Muslim
has any excuse for not knowing, that the call for Arab
nationalism or any other kind of nationalism, is a
false call, grave error and blatant evil; it is a bad
jaahili attitude and a plot against Islam and its
followers. That is due to many reasons that we have
explained in a separate book entitled Naqd al-Qawmiyyah
al-‘Arabiyyah ‘ala Daw' al-Islam wa'l-Waaqi'
(Criticism of Arab Nationalism in the Light of Islam
and Reality).
Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz (4/173).
This book is published in its entirety in Fataawa al-Shaykh
Ibn Baaz (1/280-318).
The Shaykh (may Allaah have mercy on him) also said:
One of the greatest of evils and follies is to compare
Islam to Arab nationalism. Does nationalism that is
devoid of Islam have any characteristics that qualify
it to be counted among the ranks of Islam? Can there
be any comparison between the two? Undoubtedly this is
the gravest insult to Islam and a denial of its
principles and wise teachings. How can any sound mind
compare between nationalism and Islam when, if Abu
Jahl, ‘Utbah ibn Rabee'ah, Shaybah ibn Rabee'ah and
other enemies of Islam were alive, they would be among
the most prominent supporters and greatest proponents
of nationalism, whereas the proponents and supporters
of Islam in every time and place are Muhammad the
Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him), Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab,
‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan, ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib and other
Sahaabah, the supporters and heroes of Islam, and
those righteous people who followed their path? No one
would justify comparing nationalism of this ilk, with
these men as its supporters, and a religion of such
standing, with such supporters and proponents, except
one who is deranged, or is a blind follower, or a
bitter enemy of Islam. The one who makes such a
comparison is like one who compares dung and pearls,
or Prophets and devils. The one with insight who
ponders this and examines the facts closely, will
clearly see that comparing nationalism and Islam is
more dangerous to Islam that the comparisons mentioned
above. Moreover, how can it be valid to compare
nationalism, the fate of one who dies following which
is Hell, and Islam, the destiny of one who dies
following which is the victory of abiding close to the
Lord in an abode of honour?
O Allaah, guide us and our people to the Straight
Path, for You are able to do all things.
Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz (1/320, 321).
These are two useful answers from the Shaykh (may
Allaah have mercy on him) about the comparison between
Arab nationalism and Islam. The second answer contains
the ruling on one who compares between them, and says
that he is deranged or a blind follower or a bitter
enemy of Islam.
The one who knows nothing about the status of
nationalism may be excused, But if a person is
ignorant of Islam and believes that some other
religion, system or principle is better than it, he is
undoubtedly a kaafir.
Thirdly:
If we examine the second scenario, then we will see
that the questioner has spoken ill of the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) by making
this comparison, and the respondent has spoken worse
ill by answering this foolishness, which is kufr in
and of itself, because it is undermining the status of
the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) and speaking ill of him.
What the Muslim must do is venerate his Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and support him,
and protect him against everything that may offend
him; he must also honour him and respect him. Allaah
has stated that this is one of the characteristics of
the believers, and He has enjoined it on the Muslims.
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"So those who believe in him (Muhammad Peace And
Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him), honour him, help
him, and follow the light (the Qur'aan) which has been
sent down with him, it is they who will be successful"
[al-A'raaf 7:157]
"Verily, We have sent you (O Muhammad Peace And
Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him) as a witness, as a
bearer of glad tidings, and as a warner.
9. In order that you (O mankind) may believe in Allaah
and His Messenger (Peace And Blessings Of Allaah Be
Upon Him), and that you assist and honour him (Peace
And Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him), and (that you)
glorify (Allaah's) praises morning and afternoon"
[al-Fath 48:8,9]
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on
him) said:
Allaah has enjoined assisting him, as He says "and
that you assist and honour him". Ta'zeer (assisting)
means helping him, supporting him and protecting him
against everything that may offend him.
Honouring refers to everything in which there is
tranquillity and peace of mind, such as honour and
respect, and dealing with him with the utmost respect
and dignity
Al-Saarim al-Maslool (1/425).
Respecting and honouring him is not limited to his
lifetime (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him),
rather it is also required after his death.
Al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
It should be noted that revering, respecting and
venerating the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) is required after his death, just as it
was required during his lifetime, by showing respect
when his name, is mentioned, (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him), when you hear his hadeeth and
Sunnah, when reading his seerah (biography); it also
includes showing respect to the members of his
household and his companions.
Al-Shifa fi Ahwaal al-Mustafa (2/40).
Allaah, may He be blessed and exalted, has forbidden
the Muslims to call the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) by his name only, as they do
with one another; this is by way of venerating him
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"Make not the calling of the Messenger (Muhammad Peace
And Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him) among you as your
calling one of another. Allaah knows those of you who
slip away under shelter (of some excuse without taking
the permission to leave, from the Messenger Peace And
Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him). And let those who
oppose the Messenger's (Muhammad's) commandment (i.e.
his Sunnah legal ways, orders, acts of worship,
statements) (among the sects) beware, lest some Fitnah
(disbelief, trials, afflictions, earthquakes, killing,
overpowered by a tyrant) should befall them or a
painful torment be inflicted on them"
[al-Noor 24:63]
al-Dahhaak narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas said: They used
to say "Ya Muhammad (O Muhammad); Ya Aba'l-Qaasim (O
Abu Qaasim)", but Allaah forbade them to do that out
of respect for His Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him). He said: So they said: "Ya rasool
Allaah (O Messenger of Allaah); Ya Nabi Allaah (O
Prophet of Allaah)." This was also stated by Mujaahid
and Sa'eed ibn Jubayr.
Qataadah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Allaah
enjoined that his Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) should be respected, honoured and
venerated.
Muqaatil ibn Hayyaan said: Do not call him by name
when you call him, by saying: O Muhammad; and do not
say O son of ‘Abd-Allaah; rather honour him by saying
"Ya Nabi Allaah (O Prophet of Allaah); Ya rasool
Allaah (O Messenger of Allaah)."
Maalik said, narrating from Zayd ibn Aslam: Allaah
commanded them to honour him.
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"O you who believe! Say not (to the Messenger Peace
And Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him) Raa‘ina [In
Arabic it means ‘Be careful; Listen to us, and we
listen to you' but in Hebrew it is an insult] but say
Unzurna (make us understand) and hear"
[al-Baqarah 2:104]
"O you who believe! Raise not your voices above the
voice of the Prophet (Peace And Blessings Of Allaah Be
Upon Him), nor speak aloud to him in talk as you speak
aloud to one another, lest your deeds should be
rendered fruitless while you perceive not.
3. Verily, those who lower their voices in the
presence of Allaah's Messenger (Peace And Blessings Of
Allaah Be Upon Him), they are the ones whose hearts
Allaah has tested for piety. For them is forgiveness
and a great reward.
4. Verily, those who call you from behind the
dwellings, most of them have no sense.
5. And if they had patience till you could come out to
them, it would have been better for them"
[al-Hujuraat 49:2-5]
All of this has to do with proper etiquette in
addressing the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him), speaking with him and in his presence.
They were also enjoined to offer charity before
speaking to him.
Tafseer Ibn Katheer (6/88, 89).
Allaah has warned the one who raises his voice in the
presence of His Prophet that he may lose his good
deeds, which may be rendered invalid.
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"O you who believe! Raise not your voices above the
voice of the Prophet (Peace And Blessings Of Allaah Be
Upon Him), nor speak aloud to him in talk as you speak
aloud to one another, lest your deeds should be
rendered fruitless while you perceive not.
[al-Hujuraat 49:2]
Shaykh ‘Abd al-Rahmaan al-Sa'di (may Allaah have mercy
on him) said:
This is etiquette to be observed with the Messenger of
Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)
when addressing him, i.e., the one who is addressing
him should not raise his voice above (the Prophet's)
voice, and he should not speak loudly to him, rather
he should lower his voice and address him in a polite
and gentle manner, with veneration, respect, honour
and esteem. The Messenger is not like one of them,
rather they should address him differently as he is
different from anyone else with regard to his rights
over the ummah and the obligation to believe in him
and love him, without which faith is not complete. Not
observing that etiquette may lead to serious
consequences, and there is the fear that a person's
good deeds may be rendered invalid without him
realizing it. Observing proper etiquette with him is
also a means of attaining reward and having one's good
deeds accepted.
Tafseer al-Sa'di (p. 799).
The scholars are unanimously agreed that it is
obligatory to execute the one who reviles the
Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him),
or criticizes him, or speaks of him with disrespect,
whether that is explicit or implicit.
Al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
It should be noted that everyone who reviles the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him),
or criticizes him, or attributes to him any
shortcoming in his character, lineage, religious
commitment or any other attribute, or undermines his
position by means of hints, or likens him to something
in a way that implies reviling him, scorning him,
belittling him, finding fault with him or criticizing
him, comes under the ruling on one who reviles him,
and is to be executed. Capital punishment also applies
to the one who curses the Messenger of Allaah (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him), or prays against
him or wishes for harm to befall him, or attributes to
him something that does not befit his status by way of
criticism, or says anything foolish about him, or says
something bad and false about him, or criticizes him
for some calamities and trials that befell him, or
tries to undermine his position because of some human
trait that is possible for a Prophet.
There is scholarly consensus on this point, from the
time of the companions of the Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) until how,
and until Allaah inherits the earth and everything on
it.
Al-Shifa' bi Ta'reef Huqooq al-Mustafa (2/214).
Fourthly:
The words and deeds which put a person beyond the pale
of Islam come under the same ruling whether they are
said in jest or in earnest, or as a mockery. Allaah
says (interpretation of the meaning):
"If you ask them (about this), they declare: ‘We were
only talking idly and joking.' Say: ‘Was it at Allaah,
and His Ayaat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons,
signs, revelations, etc.) and His Messenger (Peace And
Blessings Of Allaah Be Upon Him) that you were
mocking?'
66. Make no excuse; you disbelieved after you had
believed. If We pardon some of you, We will punish
others amongst you because they were Mujrimoon
(disbelievers, polytheists, sinners, criminals)"
[al-Tawbah 9:65-66]
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on
him) said:
This is a clear statement that mocking Allaah, His
Signs and His Messenger is kufr, so it applies even
more so to deliberate reviling. This verse indicates
that everyone who denigrates the Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), whether
in earnest or in jest has committed an act of kufr.
Al-Saarim al-Maslool (1/37).
So you should advise this man and remind him to fear
Allaah, and explain to him how abhorrent his words
are. The religion of Allaah, may He be exalted, is not
something to be debated and argued, or to be mocked
and made fun of. Tell him that what he must do is
repent sincerely to Allaah and regret what he has
done, and do a lot of good deeds, in the hope that
Allaah might guide him and forgive him.