|
05 September 2012 By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed Can you imagine that the people of Riyadh – this
extremely conservative city – were the most tolerant!
Three decades ago, there were theatres in Riyadh's
schools, and cinema's in their sports' clubs, whilst
military bands could be heard playing music in the
city's streets. Its holidays were marked by popular
celebrations and cultural exhibitions and artistic
showcases could be seen on television. The same can be said about Cairo in the 1960s and
70s, with regards to its theatres, arts and
institutes…and this is being said more and more about
Kuwait. Whilst there are pictures of the Baghdad of
yesteryear that the Baghdad of today would not
believe; al-Rasheed Street and its role in the arts,
culture and worship. I have a picture of the MGM
offices in 1940s Baghdad, so who can believe what is
happening today? We become more shocked when we hear about the
conflict in Tunis and its suburbs, and the prosecution
of artists in Cairo, which is something that nobody is
paying attention to today! Whilst what happened in
Alexandria was even worse; as bulldozers destroyed the
famous Al-Nabi Daniel Street book market on Friday
morning. All societies are moving forward and hoping for the
best, however it seems that we are moving towards the
setting sun, and nobody knows when this will rise. Egypt is facing the greatest example of this
phenomenon, as what has happened there represents a
frightening beginning against the arts, creativity and
two centuries of development. This is important
because Egypt is the greatest and last citadel for the
arts and creativity in the region and its end will
mark the descent of the region into darkness. Egyptian
President Mohamed Mursi rushed to meet with a group of
artists in an attempt to calm the community and end
the war between the artists and the extremists; this
has given rise to hopes that Mursi is not from the
ranks of the radicals. Everybody who emerged from this
meeting was smiling and appeared optimistic, thanking
the president for his initiative and position. Perhaps
they are right, not because Mursi does not mean what
he says, and I believe that he truly does mean this,
in terms of support and commitment to protect the arts
and culture. However the question that must be asked
here is: is Mursi the president stronger than the
Brotherhood Mursi? Who will prevent the attack on the pillars of
culture and the role of arts by extremist groups that
believe that they brought Mursi to power, not the
other way round? The problem in their reasoning is that political
victory and electoral majority means a cultural
victory over other cultures, and this victory is
therefore a green light against others. A partisan
victory and large electorate grants the right of
political administration, but it does not eliminate
others; this is something that is at the heart of
individual rights and freedoms. Our society is full of loud discussions, and the
political and social talk ignores the most important
issue – which represents the first step – and this is
that rights and freedoms are fixed, no matter if we
are talking about the rights of those on the margin or
in the minority. They have the right of coexistence,
tolerance and the acceptance of others. What is puzzling is that our Arab world is full of
ideas and desires for change and calls for reform;
however those who raise the banners of "rights" and
"freedoms" do not care to define this to themselves
and their followers. What does "rights" truly mean?
Who does this apply to? What are "freedoms" and what
are their limits? What is certain is that when the political or
religious conservatives raise the slogans of "rights"
and "freedoms", or get involved in democratic work,
this means that society has reached its peak maturity,
however we have now seen them fall at the first
hurdle! In other words, we are facing the culture of
retreating in the name of progress, rejecting one form
of injustice in order to impose another form of this.
In Tunisia, the Ben Ali regime would deprive its
opponents of their rights and freedoms, whilst today
certain groups within the government are behaving
worse than the police did during the Ben Ali era.
Following this less-than-ideal introduction of the new
era, can we be optimistic for the future? I believe
so, because we are in the early stages of a social
conflict, rather than a conflict with a regime, and
the people will not accept their rights being deprived
under any name! |