As Court Martial Approaches, Support
For Bradley Manning Grows
13 December 2012
By Karin Friedemann
In 2010, 22-year-old Army intelligence analyst
Bradley Manning was charged with leaking classified
information to Wikileaks, which was widely seen as a
catalyst for the Arab Spring that began in December
2010.
Asia Times reported that the documents revealed "US
war crimes, including the video of US soldiers in a
helicopter gunship enjoying themselves murdering
civilians walking along the street as if the soldiers
were playing a video game."
"According to the US Military Code, US soldiers are
required to make war crimes known. However, the law on
the books provided no protection to Bradley Manning,"
wrote Paul Craig Roberts.
Last week, Bradley Manning's defense faced off with
military prosecutors in Ft. Meade, Maryland to argue
that all charges be dismissed because of "unlawful
pretrial punishment." This hearing was second in
importance only to the court martial.
Manning testified about his treatment at a military
prison in Quantico, Virginia. He can only see natural
light as a reflected gleam from a window down the hall
when he holds his head to the door of his cell and
looks through the crack. His 6ft by 8ft cell contains
a toilet that is in full vision of the guards. When he
needs toilet paper, he told the court, he has to stand
to attention and shout: "Lance Corporal Detainee
Manning requests toilet paper!" Held in solitary
confinement and prohibited from exercising, Manning
testified that he is "authorized to have 20 minutes
sunshine, in chains, every 24 hours." Expert witnesses
stated that these harsh restrictions are worse than
Guantanamo Bay or even death row.
Military judge Colonel Denise Lind announced that
Manning's court martial, which had been set to begin
in February, would now be delayed until March 16 at
the earliest, due to the debate over his unlawful
confinement.
Under the most severe of the 22 counts he faces –
"aiding the enemy" – Manning could be detained in
military custody for the rest of his life. In a
proposed plea bargain, Manning would admit to leaking
a battlefield video file, classified memos, Iraq war
logs, Afghanistan war logs and other classified
materials. He would also plead guilty to wrongfully
storing classified information, in hopes of a lighter
sentence.
Meanwhile, peace activists around the world are
pushing for dismissal of all charges. Protests at Fort
Meade, recruiting centers, and US embassies demanded
fair treatment for Bradley, considered by many to be
the most important whistleblower of our time.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Mairead Maguire and Adolfo
Pérez Esquivel published a letter of support in The
Nation on December 3, 2012, which stated:
"We Nobel Peace Prize laureates condemn the
persecution Bradley Manning has suffered, including
imprisonment in conditions declared "cruel, inhuman
and degrading" by the United Nations, and call upon
Americans to stand up in support of this whistleblower
who defended their democratic rights...
If Bradley Manning released the documents, as the
prosecution contends, we should express to him our
gratitude for his efforts toward accountability in
government, informed democracy and peace."
Ray McGovern, a high-ranking retired C.I.A. analyst,
called Manning "our friend" and "a hero."
Bradley Manning Support Network is asking all people
to submit photos of themselves holding a sign that
reads "I am Bradley Manning," to show the world that
people from all walks of life believe the public
deserves to know the truth. Their website,
iam.bradleymanning.org states:
"Whistle-blowers play an important role in a
democracy, and by revealing evidence of unpunished war
crimes, as well as secret corporate influence on U.S.
foreign policy, Bradley Manning acted in the interest
of American citizens."
Commentator Glenn Greenwald wrote, "Manning has been
subjected for many months without pause to inhumane,
personality-erasing, soul-destroying,
insanity-inducing conditions of isolation similar to
those perfected at America's Supermax prison in
Florence, Colorado: all without so much as having been
convicted of anything."
David House, a 23-year-old MIT researcher who
befriended Manning after his detention (and then had
his laptops, camera and cellphone seized by Homeland
Security) is one of the few people to have visited
Manning several times at Quantico. He describes
worrying changes in Manning's physical appearance and
behavior just over the course of a few months.
President Obama's state department spokesman, retired
air force colonel PJ Crowley, resigned after publicly
condemning Manning's treatment.
According to chat logs released by Wired Magazine,
Manning clearly believed that he was a whistle-blower
acting with the noblest of motives.
Manning told hacker Adrian Lamo that the leaks were
intended to create "worldwide discussion, debates, and
reforms… because without information, you cannot make
informed decisions as a public."
Manning described to Lamo the incident which first
made him seriously question the US government. He was
instructed to work on the case of Iraqi "insurgents"
who had been detained for distributing so-called
"insurgent" literature which, when Manning had it
translated, turned out to be nothing more than "a
scholarly critique against PM Maliki."
"I had an interpreter read it for me… and when i found
out that it was a benign political critique titled
"Where did the money go?" and following the corruption
trail within the PM's cabinet… i immediately took that
information and *ran* to the officer to explain what
was going on… he didn't want to hear any of it… he
told me to shut up and explain how we could assist the
FPs in finding *MORE* detainees… i had always
questioned the things worked, and investigated to find
the truth… but that was a point where i was a *part*
of something… i was actively involved in something
that i was completely against…" wrote Manning.
Lamo reported Manning to US authorities.
"The government's radical theory is that, although
Manning had no intent to do so, the leaked information
could have helped al-Qaida, a theory that essentially
equates any disclosure of classified information – by
any whistleblower, or a newspaper – with treason,"
writes Greenwald.
79-year-old former military analyst Daniel Ellsberg,
who is often praised for his 1971 leak of the
Pentagon's secret history of the Vietnam War, said
that Wikileaks' disclosure of government secrets on
the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and thousands of
diplomatic cables was "exactly the right thing" to do.
Ellsberg once faced criminal charges over his leak,
but they were thrown out by a judge.
But military law experts told The Huffington Post that
the odds are low that his charges will simply be
dismissed.