Nations Don't Live By F-16s Alone: The
Nazi Doctrine Of Lebensraum, The Illusions Of False
Hope
27 December 2012
By Khalid Amayreh
Binyamin Netanyahu and Avigdor leiberman are the
perfect fascist couple that will shape Israeli policy
and lead the Zionist entity for the next few years.
Netanyahu is a notorious-propagandist turned
politician, who is indoctrinated in Zio-Nazism. His
views, political behaviors and especially his actions
testify to this prognosis.
Not only does Netanyahu believe in the "inherent
superiority" of Jews over non-Jews, but he seems to be
a firm believer in the Nazi doctrine of Lebensraum.
This is why he wastes no time trying to seize
additional Arab land to incorporate into Israel. This
is exactly what Nazi Germany did when it sought
territorial aggrandizement at the expense of its
neighbors, which ignited the Second World War.
The Nazi leadership sought to justify its expansionism
policy by arguing that Germany merely needed a
breathing space, and that the acquisition of
neighbors' territories by force would eventually bring
lasting stability and peace. Netanyahu and other
Zionist leaders are virtually making the same
argument.
Indeed, when trying to defend the manifestly criminal
policy of confiscating Arab land (confiscating is
euphemism for stealing), Netanyahu would claim that
Israel is only recovering ancient Jewish land and that
the actual theft of Arab land would have no effect on
the so-called peace process.
In short, the Israeli premier just practices brash
lying just as he breathes the oxygen of life. This is
the leader of a state that claims to adhere to the
Torah of Moses which teaches "thou shall not lie."
Like most other politicians, Netanyahu lies knowingly
and deliberately, even enthusiastically. However, he
thinks that lying, even in its ugliest form, is a
necessary part of being a successful politician.
To be sure, Netanyahu is not really a shrewd or wise
politician. He is actually a visionless, tactless and
dishonest extremist who is leading Jews to disaster.
Netanyahu and like-minded Israeli leaders have
effectively decapitated any remaining chances for
peace, not only with the Palestinians, but also with
the Muslim world.
With characteristic arrogance, Netanyahu thinks Israel
will remain strong forever and Muslims will remain
weak forever. But that is no less than moral and
historical blindness. It is a blindness the
consequences of which Jews will undoubtedly suffer
rather badly and for a long time. This is because the
strong, whether the Roman Empire, or the Ottoman
State, or Great Britain, or the Soviet Union, doesn't
remain strong forever nor does the weak remain weak
for ever. This is an evident and timeless historical
axiom that never stops functioning, regardless of time
and place.
Besides, Muslims are not known for having a short
historical memory. The Crusades had occupied Palestine
for over 120 years. They murdered untold numbers of
Muslims (and Christians). They actually converted the
Aqsa Mosque into a stable for their horses.
There is no doubt that Israel is moving on a losing
course as the facts of geography and history stand
decidedly against the Zionist enterprise. The Crusades
created kingdoms and fiefdoms in Palestine and
elsewhere in the region which lasted for a longer
duration than has Israel.
But, the Crusades met their ultimate fate because they
couldn't overcome the basic dichotomy between their
colonialist dreams and the geographic and demographic
realities of the Middle East.
Eventually, Israel will have to meet the same fate of
the Crusades.
Yes, Israel does possess a huge arsenal of deadly
weapons. Israel also controls the politics and
policies of the United States. But states also need a
real moral fabric to survive the treacherous pitfalls
of history. Nations don't live by F-16s alone.
As to Leiberman, he represents the Stalinist part of
Netanyahu, but obviously without Stalin's
intelligence.
Leiberman is notorious for his Nazi-like ideas, which
include, inter alia, a proposed blanket bombing of
Palestinian population centers, drowning Palestinian
political prisoners in the Dead Sea and bombing the
Aswan High Dam in Egypt .
Leiberman is also a known proponent of ethnic
cleansing of Palestinians not only in the West Bank
but also across the Green Line, e.g. in the
territories occupied in 1948.
Leiberman and Netanyahu are expected to receive the
biggest share of votes in the upcoming Israeli
elections scheduled for 22 January. This is a telling
fact about the collective mentality of the bulk of the
Israeli Jewish society.
Hence, pundits predict the next Israeli government
will be the most extremist ever since the
establishment of the Jewish state in 1948. This means
that all remaining hopes for a peaceful settlement
between Israel and the Palestinians, especially one
based on the land-for peace formula and the two-state
solution strategy will evaporate. In fact, vestiges of
the next government's policies are already apparent
before our eyes with the latest plethora of Israeli
government decisions to build thousands of additional
settler units all over the West Bank, especially in
occupied East Jerusalem.
Some naïve or overly optimistic observers would argue
that the international community will not allow Israel
to destroy the peace process and therefore perpetuate
the conflict in a sensitive part of the world for many
decades to come.
But such dismal arguments are based on wishful
thinking as well as the erroneous presumption that the
international community has the ability and resolve to
restrain Israel, let alone force the Jewish state to
give up the occupied territories which Israel seized
in 1967.
The truth of the matter is that both Europe and the
United States lack the ability, even if they had the
inclination, to force Israel to walk in the path of
peace.
This is not only due to the fact that Israel and her
supporters and allies in Washington dominate the
American government, especially the Congress.
The situation on the ground in the West Bank,
especially in Jerusalem, is extremely unlikely to
enable any prospective Israeli government to undo the
settlement enterprise since doing so would be a
political suicide for any government.
And if we add the other equally insurmountable
problems, such as the paramount issue of the right of
return for millions of uprooted Palestinian refugees
awaiting repatriation to their former homes and
villages in what is now Israel, the prospects of a
lasting reconciliation becomes more than farfetched.
True, one should always be hopeful and optimistic. But
one should also free oneself from the illusions of
false hope and deal realistically with reality.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments