The Brotherhood, The Constitution And
Tyranny: The Problem With The Muslim Brotherhood
16 December 2012By Osman Mirghani
The problem with the Muslim Brotherhood is that
they lost their credibility in the eyes of a
considerable portion of the Egyptian people within
just a few months as a result of their manoeuvres,
their lack of commitment to their pledges, their
tendency towards despotism and their attempts to
impose their vision by means of fraud and
intimidation. The recent constitutional decree crisis
is nothing more than one chapter in a book of such
crises written by the Brotherhood with their own hand
since the January 2011 revolution. This has exposed
their tendency towards despotism, and the Brotherhood
has suffered heavy losses as a result of their failure
to fulfil their promises. This was clear ever since
their most famous failed pledge, namely that they
would not put forward a candidate for the presidency
and that they would not seek to dominate the
parliament or Constituent Assembly, not to mention
their assurances that the draft constitution would be
based on consensus and compromise between different
components and categories of Egyptian society.
Following the huge struggle over the draft
constitution, it is clear to anybody who reads this
that the Brotherhood is not committed to its
principles and are violating the spirit and indeed
actual articles of this document. In addition to this,
the Brotherhood themselves were responsible for
supervising the drafting of this constitution thanks
to their dominance of the Constituent Assembly. In
fact, the introduction of this draft constitution
confirms that "the people are the source of
legitimacy; they alone have the right to establish
authorities. The legitimacy of these authorities is
derived from the people and subject to the people's
will, abiding by the constitutional limits in terms of
their powers and responsibility." However the
Brotherhood's conduct has neutralized this principle,
particularly their refusal to listen to the voice of
the protesters, whether those present in Egypt's
public squares or elsewhere, not to mention the
objections of those who withdrew from the Constituent
Assembly. The Brotherhood have ignored these voices
and instead insisted on imposing their own vision and
will by calling a referendum to endorse the
constitution despite the objections, protests and the
phenomenal divisions now threatening the cohesion and
stability of Egypt. As for constitutional limits in
terms of powers and responsibility, Mursi has failed
to abide by the limits of his own powers and
responsibilities as stipulated by the Constitutional
Declaration issued in March 2011 that was endorsed by
the people in a public referendum. This declaration,
which Mursi's presidential oath of office was based
on, determined the powers and authorities of the
president during the transitional period; this does
not include the authority to introduce legislations or
issue constitutional declarations, let alone grant
oneself legal immunity and grab hold of absolute
power!
The violations of the spirit of the new constitution
are not limited to the introduction, but extend to
include many constitutional articles. For example,
Article 5 stipulates that "Sovereignty of the law is
the basis of governance: It guarantees freedom for
individuals, legitimacy for the authority, and ensures
that the state and any individual shall submit to the
law, and that the state is committed to the
independence of the judiciary as well as to the
principle that no voice shall prevail over the voice
of the truth. This is in order for the Egyptian
judiciary to remain independent and capable of
maintaining its sublime message of protecting the
constitution, establishing justice and maintaining
rights and freedoms." So since the Brotherhood rose to
power, have they truly been committed to maintaining
the independence of the judiciary? Have they allowed
the judiciary to be the protector of the constitution?
Have they shown any evidence that they are committed
to judicial rulings, particularly rulings that are not
in harmony with their own desires and trends? By
simply looking at the course of events in Egypt, we
can clearly see that the Muslim Brotherhood have done
everything they can to circumvent the judiciary's
powers and impose their own vision. This was made
apparent when Mursi attempted to reverse the
Constitutional Court's ruling by recalling parliament
in July, and when he attempted to dismiss Egypt's
General Prosecutor - something that brought him into
conflict with the judiciary – before he temporarily
retracted this position. However, he later returned to
enforce this decision, at the same time as he issued
the constitutional declaration that provoked the
current crisis.
The Constitutional Declaration granted immunity to the
Constituent Assembly and Shura Council; preventing any
authority from dissolving these bodies. This, thereby,
placed these two institutions above the law, in the
same manner that the declaration granted immunity to
Mursi and all his decrees from any and all
authorities. This means that he cannot be questioned
by either the judiciary or the people! Continuing to
transgress and marginalize the judiciary, the
Brotherhood rushed to complete the draft constitution
prior to the 2 December Supreme Constitutional Court
session, during which the court was scheduled to look
at the legitimacy of the Constituent Assembly and
Shura Council. They also took action to prevent the
court's judges from holding the scheduled court
session by besieging the court headquarter from all
directions, blocking all entrances and exits and even
climbing the court's walls! This was clarified in the
statement that was issued by the court's judges in
which they announced that the Supreme Constitutional
Court would be suspending its sessions in protest,
objecting to what they described as a climate of
malice and rancor and decrying the "psychological and
material pressure" being exerted on the judges. The
statement described the situation as "the blackest day
in the history of the Egyptian judiciary." This was
perhaps a reference to the slogans being chanted by
the Brotherhood and Salafi supports outside the
courts, including "the people want the dissolution of
the Constitutional Court", "bread, freedom and the
dissolution of the Constitutional Court" and "oh
judges of the Constitutional Court, beware the
million-man protests!"
Let us compare this climate to Article 74 – of Chapter
4 – of the new constitution, which states that
"sovereignty of the law shall be the basis of rule in
the state. The independence and immunity of the
judiciary are two basic guarantees to safeguard rights
and freedoms." In this case, one must ultimately come
to the conclusion that the Brotherhood don't believe
in the draft constitution that they are urging the
people to vote for. Indeed, they are doing more than
urge, promising that those who vote yes will go to
heaven! This can be seen in a tweet posted by Dr.
Essam al-Erian, Deputy Chairman of the Freedom and
Justice Party, in which he described those who will
vote yes on the constitution – at the forthcoming
referendum – as the best of people who will certainly
go to heaven!
In fact, the draft constitution contains loose
language in certain articles that allow for different
interpretations. This is something that has aroused
real fears. As for the constitutional articles
concerning the judiciary, these introduce slogans that
are not in line with the judiciary's real practices on
the ground, not to mention the slogans raised at
Muslim Brotherhood protests! This is truly a source of
concern because the independence of, and respect for,
the judiciary are supposed to be one of the major
pillars of governance; this should function as a
guarantor for the separation of powers, the protection
of rights and the strengthening of the values of
justice and equality. The draft constitution
highlights the judiciary's independence at a time when
Mursi and the Brotherhood are launching a fierce
assault against it and trying to subjugate it to their
will. Furthermore, the constitution, in its current
form, seems to reduce the powers of the Supreme
Constitutional Court in terms of its oversight of the
law, whilst it also removes the task of supervising
the elections from the judiciary, granting this task
to a new electoral committee. This new electoral
committee opens the door for possible political
interference [in the electoral process].
The question that must be asked here is: if the Muslim
Brotherhood are not committed to the draft
constitution – which they themselves prepared –seeking
to circumvent some of its articles or trying to use
these to destroy the principle of separation of
powers, then how can they expect the Egyptian people
to accept and support this constitution? Indeed, how
can they expect Egypt to enjoy stability or calm under
a constitution such as this?
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments