Obama Under Seige In Syria: Assad's Regime Has Transported Or Used Chemical Weapons
10 May 2013
By Tariq Alhomayed
The US president is now under siege—not Bashar Al-Assad,
who is likely hiding in a cellar in Damascus.
President Obama himself announced that chemical
weapons have been transported or used by Assad. This
means a change in the rules of the game; the red lines
have been crossed. If we are to believe the rhetoric,
this will result in a US intervention—and of course,
the intervention could take various forms.
The US is not the only party claiming to have evidence
that Assad's regime has transported or used chemical
weapons: Britain, France, Israel and the Syrian
opposition also claim to have such evidence. Of
course, we should not forget that the regime itself
has accused the opposition of using chemical weapons;
neither should we forget the regime's refusal to allow
a UN team to enter Syria to conduct investigations.
Assad has now crossed every red line, according to
President Obama's yardstick. We must remember that
killing is killing, whether it is by plane or bomb or
chemical weapons, and Assad's regime has committed a
variety of atrocities against its own people.
So what will President Obama do with Assad, now that
he has broken the rules of the game? Will the US
president continue to hesitate and avoid taking
decisive action against Assad's crimes, and thus lose
his credibility? Does the US administration even
understand the seriousness of what Assad has done?
Some will point out that Saddam Hussein used chemical
weapons against the Kurds, and was not punished at the
time even though it was a crime by all standards.
However, had Saddam been punished, Assad would not
have dared to commit such a similar attack today.
Complicating the matter further, circumstances in the
region have become even more complex, particularly
with Iran's efforts to acquire nuclear and other
weapons. What Assad has done only foreshadows the hell
that awaits us if this regional proliferation is not
contained.
Regrettably, what has now been proven is that the
regimes in the region that possess these weapons do
not use them against an enemy—they use them against
their own people. This is what Saddam did, what Assad
is doing now, and what Iran will do in the future if
it is allowed to possess chemical or nuclear weapons.
Even more dangerous is that it is very likely that the
Assad regime will provide an affiliated group with
chemical weapons, so that when they are used the
regime will be able to claim that a terrorist group is
responsible. We have already seen this in the
statements of Al-Qaeda or of Abu Adas after the
assassination of Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Al-Hariri.
Assad has not changed the rules of the game in Syria
only, but in the whole region. He has proven to
President Obama the danger his regime poses, and that
it was a mistake to hesitate before engaging with the
Syrian crisis. The pressure on President Obama to take
serious, tangible action is increasing; if he fails to
act, he will lose his credibility and expose the
entire region to further violence and instability.
Until Obama moves, he is the one who is under
siege—not Bashar Al-Assad, the tyrant of Damascus.
Tariq Alhomayed is the
Editor-in-Chief of Asharq Al-Awsat, the youngest
person to be appointed that position. He holds a BA
degree in Media studies from King Abdul Aziz
University in Jeddah, and has also completed his
Introductory courses towards a Master's degree from
George Washington University in Washington D.C. He is
based in London.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments