The Charlie Hebdo White Power Rally In Paris: A Celebration Of Western Hypocrisy
15 January 2015
By Ajamu Barak
The “civilized” have created the wretched, quite
coldly and deliberately, and do not intend to change
the status quo; are responsible for their slaughter
and enslavement; rain down bombs on defenseless
children whenever and wherever they decide that their
“vital interests” are menaced, and think nothing of
torturing a man to death; these people are not to be
taken seriously when they speak of the “sanctity” of
human life, or the conscience of civilized world.
— James Baldwin
I have witnessed the spectacle of Eurocentric
arrogance many times over my long years of struggle
and resistance to colonial/capitalist domination and
dehumanization. The grotesque, 21st Century version of
the “white man’s burden,” which asserts that the
international community (meaning the West) has a moral
and legal “responsibility to protect,” is one current
example; the generalized acceptance by many in the
West that their governments have a right to wage
permanent war against the global “others” to maintain
international order is another.
Yet, when I think I have seen it all, along comes the
response to the attack at the racist, Islamophobic
publication Charlie Hebdo. Even though I shouldn’t be
surprised, I am still left in complete wonderment at
the West’s unmitigated self-centeredness and
self-righteous arrogance.
The millions who turned out on Sunday claimed to be
marching in solidarity with the victims at Charlie
Hebdo and against terrorism. They were joined by
political leaders from across Europe, Israel and other
parts of the world – on the same weekend reports were
emerging that 2,000 Nigerians may have lost their
lives at the hands of Boko Haram, another Muslim
extremist group.
Surely there would be expressions of solidarity with
the survivors in Nigeria at a gathering ostensibly to
oppose terrorism and uphold the sanctity of life. But
the expressions of solidarity never came. In fact,
based on the attention the massacre received from the
Western press, it was as if the massacre had never
happened.
It is clear that there was a different agenda for the
march and a different set of concerns for Europe. The
people of France mobilized themselves to defend what
they saw as an attack against Western civilization.
However, the events in Paris did not have to be framed
as an existential attack on the imagined values of the
liberal white West. Providing some context and making
some political links may have been beneficial for
attempting to understand what happened in the country
and a political way forward beyond the appeal to
racial jingoism.
The attack could have sparked an honest conversation
about how many Muslims experience life in contemporary
France and viewed French policies in various Muslim
and Arab nations. It could have examined the
relationship between the rise of radical Islam and the
connection of that rise to the activities of various
branches of the French intelligence services. An open
discussion might have framed it as a classic blowback
operation resulting from the weaponization of radical
Whabbanism as a tool of Western power from the late
1970s to its current assignment in Syria. But those
ideas were not allowed a forum on that massive stage.
JE SUIS CHARLIE: EUROPEAN LIVES HAVE ALWAYS
MATTERED MORE THAN OTHERS
The Je Suis Charlie slogan like one of those mindless
advertising themes meant to appeal to the unconscious
and the irrational, nevertheless, has to have cultural
reference points, culturally embedded meanings that
evoke the desire to want to buy a product, or in this
case to identify with an imagined civilization. It
does not matter that the supposed superiority of
Western civilization and its values is based on
constructed lies and myths; it is still the basis of a
cross-class, transnational white identity.
The white identity is so powerfully inculcated while
simultaneously invisibalized that identification is
not seen as the essentialized identity politics that
people of color supposedly engage in, instead it is
just being “human.” And as we witnessed this weekend
and throughout the colonial world, identification with
whiteness is not limited by one’s racial or national
assignment.
It is not necessary in this short essay to even
address the contradictory nature of the European
self-understanding, how that self-perception is
utterly disconnected from its practice, and how many
people in the world see the 500-years European
hegemony as an interminable nightmare.
However, for those folks who believe the simple
assertion that black lives matter and that “racial
progress” will be realized through progressive
legislative reform derived from a better understanding
of the harmful impact of racially discriminatory
practices, the unfiltered expressions of white
solidarity and the privileging of white life should be
a wake-up call.
The humanity and cultures of Arabs and Muslims have
been denigrated in France for decades. Full
recognition of the humanity of Arabs and Muslims has
always come at a cost – Arabs and Muslims are required
to “assimilate,” to mimic French lifestyles, embrace
the language, adopt the values and worldview of their
cosmopolitan patrons. Older generations of fully
colonized individuals subjected themselves to that
degrading ritual, but later generations see this
requirement as the colonial assault on their being
that it is and have resisted.
It is the arrogant lack of respect for the ideas and
culture of non-European peoples that drove the French
ban on the wearing of the niqab and other traditional
veiling clothing for Muslim women, just one example of
the generalized discriminatory treatment of Arabs and
Muslims in France. In this lager context, Charlie
Hebdo’s blatant disregard and disrespect for another
religion, shielded by an absolute commitment to
freedom of speech that gives them blanket immunity, is
now compounded by the “Je Suis Charlie campaign,”
orchestrated in the name of upholding the values of
liberal, Western civilization.
What it means for many of us in the Black community is
that Je Suis Charlie has become a sound bite to
justify the erasure of non-Europeans, and for ignoring
the sentiments, values and views of the racialized
“other.” In short, Je Suis Charlie has become an
arrogant rallying cry for white supremacy that was
echoed at the white power march on Sunday in Paris and
in the popularity of the new issue of Charlie Hebdo.
A shared ethical framework under the system of
capitalist/colonial white supremacy is impossible.
Deeply grounded in the European psyche and in the
contradictions of its “humanist” traditions, who was
considered fully human always had qualifications, and
equality was always a nuanced concept.
The contradictory ethical framework that informs the
world view of Parisians is grounded in the colonial
division of humanity that emerged out of the liberal
humanist movement of the 18th Century. This tradition
allowed for humanity to be divided into those people
who were considered fully human with rights that
should be respected and those peoples consigned to
non-being. Those non-beings became eligible to have
their lands taken, to be enslaved and murdered at
will.
The valuation of white life over everyone else is a
fundamental component of white supremacy and not
limited to those people that might be defined as
white. That is why no one cares about the families
that weep for their love ones in Nigeria and no one
marches for them. That is why anti-Muslim and
anti-Arab violence has exploded across France but the
only mention in the Western press is the supposed fear
in the Jewish community. And that is why that after
the attack in Baga, Nigerian authorities were largely
silent until Nigerian President Goodluck finally
issued a statement on terrorism where he forcefully
condemned the attack in Paris!
* Ajamu Baraka is a long-time human rights activist
and veteran of the Black Liberation, anti-war,
anti-apartheid and Central American solidarity
Movements in the United States. This article was
previously published by Dissident Voice.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments