The Impasse In Iraq (Part 1: The Shi'a Side) : De-Ba'athification And the Shi'a Militiafication
01 January 2015
By Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi
It has become a truism that resolution of the current
crisis in Iraq that has seen major cities — most
notably Mosul — fall out of government control at the
hands of the Islamic State (IS) will require some form
of 'reconciliation' between the Shia majority that has
led Iraq's governments since the U.S. invasion in 2003
and the Sunni Arabs, who likely constitute no more
than 20-25% of Iraq's population but were seen as
dominant since the formation of the modern Iraqi
state. 'Reconciliation' in the predominant
understanding is expected to entail some kind of
central government outreach to Sunnis.
However, is that really forthcoming? If not, why
not?The new Iraqi premier Hayder Abadi — hailing from
the Islamic Da'wah Party of his predecessor Nouri al-Maliki
— is generally seen as a more conciliatory figure than
Maliki, who is in contrast widely condemned for
perceived sectarian policies that led to the
deterioration in the security situation.However,
reconciliation must entail more than mere allocation
of government positions to Sunni political figures who
have become ever more detached from their
constituencies. It must also include reforms on the
ground that will make Sunni locals more amenable to
working with the security reforms and integrate them
into the post-Saddam order. One place to start would
be amendments to de-Ba'athification legislation that
was initiated after the overthrow of Saddam's regime
and came to be seen as 'de-Sunnification'. And in that
regard, nothing seems forthcoming.
The response to the Sunni protests of 2013 is
instructive here. While it is widely claimed that
Maliki did not attempt to make any concessions to
protestor demands, such conventional wisdom is untrue.
Through working with then deputy Sunni premier Saleh
al-Mutlaq, Maliki allowed for meaningful reforms to
de-Ba'athification to be put to parliament, but the
legislation quickly died, most notably facing
opposition from the Sadrists.
It is indeed telling that when it came to this rather
important issue on reconciliation, Maliki comes across
as the moderate, illustrating the wider Shia political
spectrum's reluctance to consider such reforms,
fearful at least of a supposed return to the prior
Sunni-dominated order. More recent attempts at Sunni
empowerment in the form of provincial autonomy have
similarly been put down across the spectrum, partly
due to belief that greater autonomy would only create
problems akin to the constant disputes between the
Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and Baghdad.
Today, the notion of de-Ba'athification amendments is
not even put to discussion. Indeed, the rise of IS,
with the collapse of conventional army divisions
caused by the group's conquests in the north of the
country, has only compounded the impasse, because it
has helped midwife the birth of dozens of Shia
militias while strengthening in particular the hand of
long-established Iranian proxies (Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq,
Kata'ib Hezbollah, Badr), the last of which was
awarded the Interior Ministry and has spearheaded
military operations south of Baghdad and in the mixed
province of Diyala.For the militias, the struggle is
perceived — not wholly without justification — as
existential in light of IS's genocidal anti-Shia
sentiments.
Yet that only further damages chances at
reconciliation, as the general tendency among Shia
militias is to treat all Sunnis in a combat zone as
IS, which has resulted in ethnic cleansing in areas
like Jurf al-Sakhr (south of Baghdad) and the wider
Baghdad belt area.Considering that the militias are
unlikely to simply disband and will seek to exert
influence, Abadi's efforts will likely only be
undercut further. This is well illustrated in the
recent hostility shown by Kata'ib Hezbollah to Abadi's
floundering 'National Guard' legislation that aims to
create local Sunni forces to fight IS, saying it will
treat the formations as an 'American-affiliated Sahwa.'
As the Iranian proxies in particular frame the recent
upheaval as an American conspiracy against Iraq, such
enmity is sure to create conflict and hinder a
coordinated effort to roll back IS. But is the impasse
wholly or primarily to be blamed on the Shia side?
Stay tuned for part two, which will explore the issues
regarding Sunnis and Iraq's impasse.
* Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi is a
graduate from Brasenose College, Oxford University,
with a degree in Classics and Oriental Studies. His
research interests primarily concern Iraq and Syria,
focusing on armed groups on all sides of the conflicts
therein. He is also the Jihad-Intel Research
Specialist at the Middle East Forum. His website is
http://www.aymennjawad.org.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments