Can General John Nicholson Win the War!!
26 February 2016By Shahamat Emarat
Latest media reports say that American General John Nicholson has been
appointed as the replacement for General John Campbell, the current commander
of the invading forces in our beloved country. After obtaining approval from
the Congress as a new commander of invaders, he will take charge of killing,
harassing and displacing the Afghans from their country. On top of this he
will be responsible for protecting, supporting and supervising the two-headed
Kabul administration. Like his predecessor (General John Campbell) he will be
the source of authority to which the Kabul administration will refer to for
resolving their internal squabbling. He will also be responsible for training
military forces of the two-headed Kabul administration and in charge of
determining military targets for them. Moreover invaders will participate in
fighting and just as before, civilians will be victims of this fighting
because they do not accept invasion.
The press secretary of US Department of Defense Peter Cook has touted the
talents of John Nicholson and has considered him as an exceptionally
experienced and qualified person to lead its troops. But are these qualities
of the General enough to win the war?
If we look into the past decade of the imposed war on Afghanistan we would
conclude that despite the large number of troops and despite perpetrating
brutalities, atrocities and barbarism on the Afghan nation, American generals
have left Afghanistan with frustration and humiliation one after another. The
commander of American and NATO troops General David McKiernan, General Stanley
McChrystal, General David Petraeus and General John Allen are examples to be
cited here. These generals were also considered efficient, experienced and
even compared to the likes of Aristotle at the time but the defeat of their on
the battlefield and moral indecency of others are well known to everyone.
The question which arises here is ‘what is the reason behind the defeat of
American generals or in other words the defeat of America?' Notwithstanding
plenty of wealth and strength, military might and logistical equipment,
weapons and ammunition plus allies and surrogates? From material point of
view, they are strong in all military aspects. Hence it is urgent that
American officials and scholars carefully revise the issue at hand to find the
real factor behind these defeats.
We believe the reason behind their defeat is their pursuit of wrong
objectives. They are sacrificing their soldiers, wealth and weapons to spread
mischief and to protect an internationally renowned corrupt administration.
They openly accept God but do not accept His commandments and Almighty Allah
does not like mischief and mischief-makers.
{وَاللَّهُ لَا يُحِبُّ الْفَسَادَ} (البقرة – ۲۰۵)
And Allah likes not mischief. (Verse: 205, Surah:2)
In fact they are protecting and supporting mischief and mischief-makers.
The power source of the Islamic Emirate is based in their belief in Almighty
Allah as well as confidence and trust in His ultimate victory while the secret
of our enduring strength lies in the purity of our objectives and support of
people. The Islamic Emirate has started its Jihad for the implementation of a
just Islamic system in the country and is struggling for the independence and
freedom of our country and salvation of our nation from occupying forces and
corruption. History is a witness that the secret of success lies in the
sacredness of objectives. The history of struggle between Abraham (PBUH) and
Nimrod; Moses (PBUH) and Pharaoh; Talot (PBUH) and Goliath and the Holy
Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him) and Abu Jahl shows that truth is always
victorious at the end even though the scales may fanot in the initial stages
of struggle between truth and falsehood.
{وَتِلْكَ الأَيَّامُ نُدَاوِلُهَا بَيْنَ الناس} (آل عمران – ۱۴۰)
And such are days (of varying fortune) We give to men by turns (Verse: 140,
Surah: 3)
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments